Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/777,949

PACKET LOSS CONCEALMENT FOR DIRAC BASED SPATIAL AUDIO CODING

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 19, 2024
Priority
Jun 12, 2019 — EU 19179750.5 +2 more
Examiner
FAHNERT, FRIEDRICH
Art Unit
2692
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
547 granted / 650 resolved
+22.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
668
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
80.8%
+40.8% vs TC avg
§102
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
§112
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 650 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 07/19/2024, 09/25/2024, 12/05/2024 and 07/01/2025 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 4-5, 12, 15, 18, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Huang (US 20160148618 A1). Regarding claim 1, 18, and 20, Huang (US 20160148618 A1) method, device and non-transitory digital storage medium for loss concealment of spatial audio parameters (Huang, ¶ [0002]: “the concealment of artifacts that result from loss of spatial audio packets during audio transmission over a packet-switched network.”), the spatial audio parameters comprising at least a direction of arrival information (Huang, ¶ [0051]), the method comprising: receiving a first set of spatial audio parameters comprising at least a first direction of arrival information (Huang, Fig. 3A, items 100 and 200; ¶ [0051 and 0123]); receiving a second set of spatial audio parameters, comprising at least a second direction of arrival information (Huang, Fig. 3A, items 100 and 200; ¶ [0051]: “the input audio signal may be ambisonic B-format signal”, the first as well as the second set of parameters are of the same type; see also ¶ [0123]); and a processor (Huang, ¶ [0008]) for replacing the second direction of arrival information of a second set by a replacement direction of arrival information derived from the first direction of arrival information (Huang, ¶ [0062-0063], ¶ [0068]], with emphasis in restoring (smoothed) the direction parameters in spherical coordinates) if at least the second direction of arrival information or a portion of the second direction of arrival information is lost or damaged (Huang, ¶ [0066]: “pth frame has been lost”, ¶ [0068]); wherein the first set of spatial audio parameters belongs to a first point of time, wherein the second set of spatial audio parameters belongs to a second point of time (Huang, Figs. 7 and 8, item 404; ¶ [0087-0088], [0091]). Regarding claim 2, Huang discloses all the limitations of claim 1. Huang further discloses, wherein the first and second sets (adjacent) of spatial audio parameters comprise a first and a second diffuseness information, respectively (Huang, ¶ [0065]: “diffuseness d”, ¶ [0060]). Regarding claim 4, Huang discloses all the limitations of claim 2. Huang further discloses, wherein the method further comprises replacing the second diffuseness information of a second set by a replacement diffuseness information derived from the first diffuseness information (Huang, ¶ [0065]: “a lost packet/frame, both the eigen channel components and the spatial parameters are lost, and PLC will be conducted for creating new eigen channel components and spatial parameters to replace those of the lost packet/frame.”, ¶ [0068]: “adaptively produced based on other physical property like diffuseness of frame p”). Regarding claim 5, Huang discloses all the limitations of claim 1. Huang further discloses, wherein the replacement direction of arrival information complies with the first direction of arrival information (Huang, ¶ [0068]). Regarding claim 12, Huang discloses all the limitations of claim 1. Huang further discloses, wherein the method comprises extrapolating the first direction of arrival information to acquire the replacement direction of arrival information (Huang, ¶ [0068]: “spatial parameters may be composed of d, φ, and θ. Stability of spatial parameters is critical in maintaining perceptual continuity. So, the second concealment unit (FIG. 3) may be configured to smoothing the spatial parameters directly.” The replacement direction parameter is alpha times the direction of the (p-1)th frame, which is an extrapolation from the past value.). Regarding claim 15, Huang discloses all the limitations of claim 1. Huang further discloses, wherein the first set of spatial audio parameters belong to a first frame and wherein the second set of spatial audio parameters belongs to a second frame; or wherein the first set of spatial audio parameters belong to a first point in time and wherein the second point in time is subsequent to the first point in time or wherein the second frame is subsequent to the first frame (Huang, ¶ [0060]: “for restoring a lost frame, either a future frame or a history frame may be used, and we generally may use the immediately adjacent future or history frame. An immediately adjacent history frame may be called “the last frame”. In a variant, when replicating the corresponding monaural component, an attenuation factor may be used.”). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huang (US 20160148618 A1), and further in view of Pulkki et al ("Directional audio coding - perception-based reproduction of spatial sound", International Workshop on the Principles and Application on Spatial Hearing, Nov. 2009, Zao; Miyagi, Japan). Regarding claim 3, Huang discloses all the limitations of claim 2. Huang fails to disclose, wherein the first or the second diffuseness information is derived from at least one energy ratio related to at least one direction of arrival information. In an analogous field of endeavor, Pulkki discloses wherein the first or the second diffuseness information is derived from at least one energy ratio related to at least one direction of arrival information (Pulkki, Page 2, section 2.2 - “the sound energy is arriving from a single direction, or from all directions…the equation (2) yields estimates that are closer to the actual diffuseness of sound field”.) Therefore, it would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have used the teaching to determining the acoustic energy arriving from a single direction, or from all directions as taught by Pulkki in Huang’s invention. The motivation is to estimate de energy of a diffused sound field. Claim(s) 17, 19 and 21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huang (US 20160148618 A1), and further in view of Oomen et al., US Publication 2015/0142453 A1. Regarding Claims 17, 19 and 21, Huang, A method for a first set of spatial audio parameters and a second set of spatial audio parameters; performing the method, A non-transitory digital storage medium (Huang, ¶ [0008), and A decoder for loss concealment according to claim 1 (Huang, ¶ [0051]); Huang fails to disclose: A method for decoding a DirAC encoded audio scene, comprising: decoding the DirAC encoded audio scene comprising a downmix, A non-transitory digital storage medium having stored thereon a computer program for performing a method for decoding a DirAC encoded audio scene, comprising: and A decoder for a DirAC encoded audio scene comprising Oomen discloses: A method for decoding a DirAC encoded audio scene, comprising: A non-transitory digital storage medium having stored thereon a computer program for performing a method for decoding a DirAC encoded audio scene, comprising (Claim 19): and A decoder for a DirAC encoded audio scene (Oomen Fig. 3; ¶ [0023-0024) comprising decoding the DirAC encoded audio scene comprising a downmix (Oomen Fig. 3; ¶ [0023-0024), Therefore, it would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have used the teaching of decoding a DirAC encoded audio scene, comprising: decoding the DirAC encoded audio scene comprising a downmix in Huang’s invention as taught by Oomen’s invention. The motivation for doing this would have been in order to allow increased flexibility, reduced complexity, improved scalability and/or improved performance would be advantageous (Oomen ¶ [0035) Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6-11, 13-14, 16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FRIEDRICH FAHNERT whose telephone number is (571)270-7797. The examiner can normally be reached 7:00 am-4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, CAROLYN EDWARDS can be reached at (571)270-7136. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CAROLYN R EDWARDS/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2692 /FRIEDRICH FAHNERT/ Examiner Art Unit 2692
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 19, 2024
Application Filed
May 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12666194
Wearable Device and Signal Processing Method
1y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12651590
Headphone Speech Listening Based on Ambient Noise
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12647746
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SPATIALLY ENHANCED AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12620385
Low Latency Audio Processing System Having Active Noise Cancellation for Ear-Worn Hearing Device
3y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12621605
Audio Playback Device, Audio Playback Method Thereof and Storage Medium
2y 2m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+12.1%)
2y 6m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 650 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month