Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/778,057

THERMAL IMAGING ENDOSCOPE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 19, 2024
Priority
Apr 12, 2019 — provisional 62/833,509 +2 more
Examiner
TALLMAN, ROBERT E
Art Unit
2872
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
The Regents of the University of California
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
637 granted / 777 resolved
+14.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
789
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
47.0%
+7.0% vs TC avg
§102
29.0%
-11.0% vs TC avg
§112
20.9%
-19.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 777 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 117 and 127 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a1) as being anticipated by Hori et. al. (US 5,603,687). Regarding claim 117 Hori teaches (figs. 1-8) an endoscope, comprising: a body (30) having a proximal end and a distal end (col. 8, lines 63-67); and an imaging system (69) attached to the body proximate to the distal end of the body (col. 9, lines 4-15); where the imaging system is configured to receive light emitted by a target area in a range of wavelengths and create an image of the target area corresponding to the range of wavelengths (col. 9, lines 27-41). Examiner notes that the ability for the image sensors are imaging the sample therefor they inherently are receiving light from the sample and that detection will inherently be in a wavelength range if this was not true then the system would be unable to image the sample. Regarding claim 127 Hori teaches (figs. 1-8) a method of fabrication of an endoscope, comprising: providing a body (30) having a proximal end and a distal end (col. 8, lines 63-67); and coupling an imaging system (69) to the body proximate to the distal end of the body (col. 9, lines 4-15); where the imaging system is capable of receiving light emitted by a target area in a range of wavelengths and creating an image of the target area corresponding to the range of wavelengths (col. 9, lines 27-41). Examiner notes that the ability for the image sensors are imaging the sample therefor they inherently are receiving light from the sample and that detection will inherently be in a wavelength range if this was not true then the system would be unable to image the sample. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 118-126 and 128–136 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claims 118 and 128 contain the limitation of specifying the specific wavelength range of the camera in the distal end of the endoscope in the IR regions of the electromagnetic spectrum. With regards to claims 119-126 and 129-136 they depend on the objected to claims 118 and 128. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Further multi-imagining endoscopic structures include Boccara et. al. (US 9,046,338 B2) and Strahle et.al. (US 5,612,816). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT E TALLMAN whose telephone number is (571)270-3958. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10 a.m. -6 p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricky Mack can be reached at 571-272-2333. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Robert E. Tallman/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 19, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704703
SCANNING MICROSCOPE UNIT, SCANNING MICROSCOPE, AND CALIBRATION METHOD FOR SCANNING MICROSCOPE UNIT
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704741
LIQUID CRYSTAL DIFFRACTION ELEMENT, IMAGE DISPLAY APPARATUS, AND HEAD MOUNTED DISPLAY
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12699206
PLANAR OPTIC HYBRID TELEPHOTO LENS
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12699267
PROJECTION ARRANGEMENT COMPRISING A LAMINATED PANE
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12699212
LOW STATIC OPTICAL REMOVABLE LENS STACK
1y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+14.4%)
2y 6m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 777 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month