Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/778,123

MULTIFUNCTIONAL COMPOSITE PANELS AND METHODS FOR THE SAME

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 19, 2024
Examiner
GONZALEZ RAMOS, MAYLA
Art Unit
1721
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
The Boeing Company
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
68%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allow Rate
342 granted / 638 resolved
-11.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
682
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
53.9%
+13.9% vs TC avg
§102
17.0%
-23.0% vs TC avg
§112
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 638 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 03/09/2026 has been entered. Status of Claims Claim(s) 1, 3-12, 14-20, 23 and 24 are currently pending. Claim(s) 1, 3-5 ,11 and 15 have been amended. Claim(s) 2, 13, 21 and 22 have been canceled. Claim(s) 23 and 24 have been added. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see remarks filed 03/09/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 5 and 15 under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection(s) of claim(s) 5 and 15 under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, has been withdrawn. The cancelation of claims 21 and 22 obviates the rejection of the claims under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph. Claim Objections Claims 7, 11, 17 and 19 objected to because of the following informalities: For proper form, it is suggested that claims 7, 11, 17 and 19 be amended as follows: 7. (Original) The system of claim 6, wherein the about 1 to about 15 application heads are configured to form one or more multifunctional composite panel in the system. 11. (Currently Amended) A system for fabricating at least one multifunctional composite panel, comprising: one or more bases capable of supporting one or more multifunctional composite panels; and one or more application heads disposed proximal the one or more bases; wherein the one or more application heads are disposed above the one or more bases, wherein the one or more application heads and the one or more bases are oriented parallel to one another such that a center of the one or more application heads and a center of the one or more bases share a vertical axis, wherein the one or more application heads deposit a plurality of layers on top of the one or more bases to fabricate the one or more multifunctional composite panels, wherein the one or more application heads and the one or more bases are configured to move relative to one another during fabrication of the one or more multifunctional composite panels, and wherein the one or more application heads are configured to deposit the plurality of layers on top of the one or more bases in a direction along the vertical axis. 17. (Original) The system of claim 11, wherein the one or more application heads include between about 1 to about 15 application heads. 19. (Original) The system of claim 11, wherein the one or more application heads are capable of depositing one or more materials to form the plurality of layers in the one or more multifunctional composite panels. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 23 and 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 23 The limitation “wherein the plurality of application heads is configured to deposit a plurality of alternating layers of inorganic materials and organic materials” is unclear and therefore renders the claim indefinite. Claim 1, from which claim 23 depends, recites “the plurality of application heads are configured to deposit the plurality of layers of the multifunctional composite panel.” It is not clear if the plurality of alternating layers recited in the instant claim correspond to the plurality of layers recited in claim 1. From inspection of the instant published specification, it appears that the plurality of alternating layers deposited by the plurality of application heads correspond to the plurality of layers recited in claim 1 (see para. 0007 of the instant published specification). Examiner suggests amending the claim as follows: 23. The system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of layers of the multifunctional composite panel comprise a plurality of alternating layers of inorganic materials and organic materials. Regarding claim 24 The limitation “wherein the one or more materials alternating layers of inorganic materials and organic materials” is unclear and therefore renders the claim indefinite. The claim appears to be incomplete. One of ordinary skill in the art cannot reasonably ascertain the scope of the claim. Appropriate correction and clarification is required. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 3-12 and 14-20 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claims 1 and 11 The prior art of record, whether alone or in combination, fails to teach or fairly suggest the following limitations: (a) wherein the plurality of application heads are disposed directly above the base, and (b) wherein the plurality of application heads are configured to deposit the plurality of layers of the multifunctional composite panel onto the base in a direction along the vertical axis, in the context of other limitations recited in the claims. As seen in Fig. 16 of Elsey, the applicator 101C is positioned at an intermediate position above the base 104. Accordingly, Elsey does not disclose the limitations (a) and (b) as required by the claims. Wendt was cited for its teaching regarding the vacuum pressure within the volume of the enclosure. Allen was cited for its teaching regarding depositing the plurality of layers directly on a mandrel. Wendt and Allen, alone or in combination, do not alleviate the deficiencies in Elsey. Accordingly, the claims are allowed. Regarding claims 3-10, 12 and 14-20 Claims 3-10, 12 and 14-20 are allowed for their dependency on claims 1 and 11. As allowable subject matter has been indicated, applicant's reply must either comply with all formal requirements or specifically traverse each requirement not complied with. See 37 CFR 1.111(b) and MPEP § 707.07(a). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MAYLA GONZALEZ RAMOS whose telephone number is (571)272-5054. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday, 9:00-5:00 - EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Allison Bourke can be reached at (303)297-4684. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MAYLA GONZALEZ RAMOS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1721
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 19, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Aug 18, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 26, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Feb 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 09, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 16, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604539
SOLAR CELL MODULE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SOLAR CELL MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598818
DOPED REGION STRUCTURE AND SOLAR CELL COMPRISING THE SAME, CELL ASSEMBLY, AND PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598817
STACKED III-V MULTI-JUNCTION SOLAR CELL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593514
SOLAR CELL DESIGN FOR IMPROVED PERFORMANCE AT LOW TEMPERATURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593532
BACK CONTACT SOLAR CELL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
68%
With Interview (+14.2%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 638 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month