Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/778,174

STORAGE ORGANIZATION FOR TRANSPOSING A MATRIX USING A STREAMING ENGINE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 19, 2024
Priority
Jul 15, 2013 — provisional 61/846,148 +5 more
Examiner
FAHERTY, COREY S
Art Unit
2183
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Texas Instruments Incorporated
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
744 granted / 931 resolved
+24.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
955
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
§103
44.6%
+4.6% vs TC avg
§102
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
§112
21.6%
-18.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 931 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION This office action is in response to the reply filed on 12/11/2025. Claims 1-22 are pending in the application and have been examined. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1-7 and 15-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitations “a storage circuit coupled to the interface and comprising a plurality of storage locations, the storage circuit being configured to store the first and second portions of the first column in a first storage location and a second storage location, respectively, that are diagonally aligned and to store the first and second portions of the second column in a third storage location and a fourth storage location, respectively, that are diagonally aligned”. It is unclear whether the intent is for the claimed first, second, third, and fourth storage locations to be included within or separate from the claimed plurality of storage locations. In other words, are the first, second, third, and fourth storage locations within the storage circuit or merely controlled by the storage circuit to store the given values? Appropriate clarification is required. Claim 15 suffers from the same deficiency. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8-14 and 21-22 are allowed. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the claims have been considered but are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Corey Faherty whose telephone number is (571)270-1319. The examiner can normally be reached weekdays between 7:30 and 4:00 ET, with every other Friday off. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jyoti Mehta can be reached at (571) 270-3995. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /COREY S FAHERTY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2183
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 19, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Dec 11, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 14, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Mar 16, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12632259
SYNCHRONOUS MICROTHREADING
4y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12625706
INSTRUCTION TRANSLATION METHOD AND RELATED DEVICE THEREOF
1y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12613702
PROCESSOR AND COMPILER FOR SECURE MULTIPARTY COMPUTATION
1y 8m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12608202
FLOATING-POINT SCALAR COMPARISON WITH ENHANCED FLAGS
2y 9m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12591430
DIGITAL COMPUTE HARDWARE FOR EFFICIENT ELEMENT-WISE AND CROSS-VECTOR MAXIMUM OPERATIONS
2y 10m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+3.9%)
3y 5m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 931 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month