Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/778,466

FOLDABLE CHAIR WITH RECLINING AND SWIVELING CAPABILITIES

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 19, 2024
Priority
Jun 19, 2020 — provisional 63/041,175 +1 more
Examiner
BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL
Art Unit
3636
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Dick'S Sporting Goods Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
989 granted / 1233 resolved
+28.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1249
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
62.4%
+22.4% vs TC avg
§102
29.0%
-11.0% vs TC avg
§112
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1233 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species I, Figs. 1A-22D in the reply filed on 06/16/2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 30-31 and 33-40 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chesness (2010/0314926). Chesness shows the use of a foldable chair (100) comprising: an upper hub (120) assembly comprising: an upper hub, a seat cover (104), a first front seat bar (111) coupled to the seat cover and rotatably coupled to the upper hub, and a first back seat bar (111) coupled to the seat cover and rotatably coupled to the upper hub (Fig. 4); a lower hub assembly (110,122) comprising: a lower hub (122) comprising: a first recess extending inward (Fig. 4) from an outer surface of the lower hub, and a second recess (Fig. 4) extending inward from the outer surface, a first leg (105) having a first end positioned within the first recess, the first end rotatably coupled to the lower hub, and a second leg(105) having a second end positioned within the second recess, the second end rotatably coupled to the lower hub; and a center shaft assembly (106,121) coupling the upper hub assembly to the lower hub assembly, having a lower plate (121) and a center shaft (106) protruding therethrough. Regarding claim 31, the lower hub assembly further comprises a shim (121) having a first shape (Fig. 32A); the lower hub comprises a recess (the gap between the upper and lower hub) in confronting relation with the lower plate, the recess having a second shape matching the first shape, the recess extending at least partially around the cylindrical passage; and the shim is disposed within the recess and between the lower hub and the lower plate, the shim providing a contact surface between the lower hub assembly and the center shaft assembly. Regarding claim 33, the upper hub assembly further comprises a center support (112) disposed above the upper hub, the center support comprising: a body (Fig. 32A) having a protruding portion extending towards the upper hub (Fig. 3), a first link (113) coupled to the body above the protruding portion, a second link (113) aligned with the first link and coupled to the body above the protruding portion, a third link (113) coupled to the body above the protruding portion (114), and a fourth link (113) aligned with the third link and coupled to the body above the protruding portion; the first link and the second link are coupled to the first front seat bar; and the third link and the fourth link are coupled to the first back seat bar (as shown in Figs. 6-7). Regarding claims 34-35, the protruding portion extends within the a centrally-located cavity of the upper hub (via the center shaft assembly see Fig. 7) and along a vertical centerline of the upper hub. Regarding claims 36-37, Chesness shows the use of third and fourth recesses on the lower hub which have respective third (105) and fourth (105) legs therein and the use of second seat bar (111) and a second back bar (11) respectively. Claim(s) 30-31, 33,36-38 and 40 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Obolewicz et al. (2011/0156449). Obolewicz shows the use of folding chair (10) comprising an upper hub assembly comprising: an upper hub (80), a seat cover (100), a first front seat bar (11) coupled to the seat cover and rotatably coupled to the upper hub, and a first back seat bar (12) coupled to the seat cover and rotatably coupled to the upper hub (Fig. 1); a lower hub assembly comprising: a lower hub (70) comprising: a first recess (71) extending inward from an outer surface of the lower hub, a second recess (72) extending inward from the outer surface, and a cylindrical passage (92), a first leg (21) having a first end positioned within the first recess, the first end rotatably coupled to the lower hub, and a second leg (22) having a second end positioned within the second recess, the second end rotatably coupled to the lower hub; and a center shaft assembly (40,81) coupling the upper hub assembly to the lower hub assembly, the center shaft assembly comprising: a lower plate (81) with a planar major portion and a circular opening at a center of the planar major portion, and a center shaft (40) protruding through the circular opening and disposed within the cylindrical passage (Fig. 3). Regarding claim 31, Obolewicz shows the lower hub assembly having a shim (90) having a first shape; the lower hub comprises a recess (the spacing between the lower and upper hub, Fig. 4) in confronting relation with the lower plate, the recess having a second shape matching the first shape, the recess extending at least partially around the cylindrical passage; and the shim is disposed within the recess and between the lower hub and the lower plate (Fig. 6), providing a contact surface between the lower hub assembly and the center shaft assembly. Regarding claim 33, the upper hub assembly further comprises a center support (50) disposed above the upper hub, the center support comprising: a body having a protruding portion extending towards the upper hub (Fig. 3), a first link (30) coupled to the body above the protruding portion, a second link (33) aligned with the first link and coupled to the body above the protruding portion, a third link (31) coupled to the body above the protruding portion, and a fourth link (32) aligned with the third link and coupled to the body above the protruding portion; the first link and the second link are coupled to the first front seat bar; and the third link and the fourth link are coupled to the first back seat bar (as shown in Fig. 3). Regarding claims 36-37, Obolewicz shows the use of third and fourth recesses on the lower hub which have respective third (20) and fourth (23) legs therein and the use of second seat bar (14) and a second back bar (13) respectively. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 21-29 and 32 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chesness in view of Lee (9,339,115). Chesness shows the use of a foldable chair (100) comprising: an upper hub (120) assembly comprising: an upper hub, a seat cover (104), a first front seat bar (111) coupled to the seat cover and rotatably coupled to the upper hub, and a first back seat bar (111) coupled to the seat cover and rotatably coupled to the upper hub (Fig. 4); a lower hub assembly (110,122) comprising: a lower hub (122) comprising: a first recess extending inward (Fig. 4) from an outer surface of the lower hub, and a second recess (Fig. 4) extending inward from the outer surface, a first leg (105) having a first end positioned within the first recess, the first end rotatably coupled to the lower hub, and a second leg(105) having a second end positioned within the second recess, the second end rotatably coupled to the lower hub; and a center shaft assembly (106) coupling the upper hub assembly to the lower hub assembly, facilitating rotation of the upper hub assembly relative to the lower hub assembly, and facilitating tilting of the upper hub assembly relative to the lower hub assembly (as shown in Fig. 33). Chesness shows all of the teachings of the claimed invention except the lower hub having a hemispherical outer profile. Lee teaches the conventional use of a lower hub (32) with a hemispherical outer profile (Fig. 3). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to provide the lower hub with a hemispherical outer profiled in order to allow for a more compact storage of the legs of the folding chair. Regarding claim 21, the upper hub assembly further comprises a center support (112) disposed above the upper hub, the center support comprising: a body (Fig. 32A) having a protruding portion extending towards the upper hub (Fig. 3), a first link (113) coupled to the body above the protruding portion, a second link (113) aligned with the first link and coupled to the body above the protruding portion, a third link (113) coupled to the body above the protruding portion (114), and a fourth link (113) aligned with the third link and coupled to the body above the protruding portion; the first link and the second link are coupled to the first front seat bar; and the third link and the fourth link are coupled to the first back seat bar (as shown in Figs. 6-7). Regarding claims 23-24, the protruding portion extends within the a centrally-located cavity of the upper hub (via the center shaft assembly see Fig. 7) and along a vertical centerline of the upper hub. Regarding claims 25-26, Chesness shows the use of third and fourth recesses on the lower hub which have respective third (105) and fourth (105) legs therein and the use of second seat bar (111) and a second back bar (11) respectively. Regarding claims 27-29, claim 21, the center shaft assembly comprises: a lower plate (120,121) with a planar major portion and a circular opening at a center of the planar major portion, and a center shaft protruding through the circular opening; the lower hub comprises a cylindrical passage; and the center shaft is disposed within the cylindrical passage (as shown in Figs. 32A,33). Regarding claim 27, wherein: the lower hub assembly further comprises a shim (121) having a first shape (Fig. 32A); the lower hub comprises a recess (the gap between the upper and lower hub) in confronting relation with the lower plate, the recess having a second shape matching the first shape, the recess extending at least partially around the cylindrical passage; and the shim is disposed within the recess and between the lower hub and the lower plate, the shim providing a contact surface between the lower hub assembly and the center shaft assembly. Chesness in view of Lee has disclosed the shim is formed from a plastic but fails to disclose it’s a high-density polyethylene. It would have been an obvious matter of design choice for one of ordinary skill in the art to try a shim of made from a high-density polyethylene to further reduce friction between the lower plate and lower hub in order to provide better rotation therebetween. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTHONY D BARFIELD whose telephone number is (571)272-6852. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTHONY D BARFIELD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3636 adb June 27, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 19, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679260
SEAT SUPPORT ELEMENT COMPRISING A VENTILATION DEVICE FOR A BEARING SURFACE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674501
DAMPER FOR VEHICLE SEAT
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12662025
ADJUSTABLE PROTECTOR AND SAFETY SEAT
4y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12662026
CHILD SAFETY SEAT
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12662036
SEAT FOR VEHICLE
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+13.8%)
2y 3m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1233 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month