DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114
A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on July 15, 20226 has been entered.
Response to Arguments
Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 4-5, 11, 13-14, 17, 22, 25-26, 35 and 37-46 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claim(s) 1, 4-5, 11, 22, 25-26, 35, 37-39, and 43-46 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fujishiro (US 2022/0014987) in view of Koskela et al. (hereinafter “Koskela”, US 2023/0096338) and further in view of Awoniyi-Oteri et al. (hereinafter “Awoniyi-Oteri”, US 2021/0400586).
Regarding claims 1, and 35, Fujishiro discloses a method for wireless communication, and a first wireless communication apparatus (i.e., UE 100 as shown in Figs. 1 & 7) comprising:
receiving, by user equipment (UE) from a base station (i.e., UE 100 and eNB 200 as shown in Figs. 1 & 7), a configuration message that includes a list of candidate cells each with a configuration and a candidate cell configuration index corresponding to the configuration (i.e., receiving by the UE 100 from source eNB 200S including a “Target Config list” that is a list of configuration information for each candidate cell as described in paragraphs 0059, and 0078-0079); and
sending a communication to the target cell based on the MAC CE command and the configuration of the target cell (i.e., sending a communication in S112-S116 of Fig. 6, and as described in paragraphs 0098-0104).
Fujishiro, however, does not expressly disclose:
sending, to the base station, a measurement report that comprises a Layer 1 (“L1”) measurement for at least one of the list of candidate cells; and
receiving, from the base station, a medium access control (MAC) control element (CE) command comprising the candidate cell configuration index of a target cell of the list of candidate cells, a timing advance (TA) value related to the target cell, and a transmission configuration indicator (TCI) state of the target cell.
In a similar endeavor, Koskela discloses a base station and user equipment. Koskela also discloses:
sending, to the base station, a measurement report that comprises a Layer 1 (“L1”) measurement for at least one of the list of candidate cells (i.e., base station 400 receives measurement report REP from the UE 200 comprising information characterizing the beam measurements related to the non-serving cell N-SRVC, which is the candidate cells of claim language, as described in paragraphs 0086-0088); and
receiving, from the base station, a medium access control (MAC) control element (CE) command (i.e., the UE 200 receives an instruction from base station 100 to switch to the non-serving cell N-SRVC as described in paragraphs 0089-0090) comprising the candidate cell configuration index of a target cell of the list of candidate cells, and a transmission configuration indicator (TCI) state of the target cell (i.e., the MAC CE signaling is used for instructing including TCI state as described in paragraphs 0091, and 0158-0159).
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art to modify the teachings of the cited references, and arrive at the present invention.
The motivation/suggestion for doing so would have been to get the UE get handover to another cell without service interruption.
The combination of Fujishiro and Koskela, however, does not expressly disclose:
receiving, from the base station, a MAC-CE comprising a timing (TA) value related to the target cell.
Furthermore, Awoniyi-Oteri discloses UE measurement reporting in secondary cell group dormancy. Awoniyi-Oteri also discloses receiving, from the base station, a MAC-CE comprising a timing (TA) value related to the target cell (i.e., the MAC-CE includes a timing advance (TA) command for the secondary cells as described in paragraphs 0011, 0022, and 0131).
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art to modify the teachings of the cited references, and arrive at the present invention.
The motivation/suggestion for doing so would have been to reduce interference and ensure reliable multi-cell uplink scheduling.
With further regard to claims 35, and 46, Koskela also discloses the first wireless communications apparatus (i.e., UE 200 as shown in Fig. 2) comprising a processor (i.e., a processor 202) and a memory (i.e., 204), and a computer program product comprising computer-readable program medium code stored thereon, the code, when executed by a processor, causing the processor to perform the method according to claim 1 (i.e., a program instructions 206 is stored in the memory 204 as described in paragraph 0122).
Regarding claims 4, 25, 37, and 44, Fujishiro, Koskela, and Awoniyi-Oteri disclose all limitations recited within claims as described above. Koskela also discloses wherein the MAC CE command further comprises a Synchronization Signal Block (SSB) identification (ID) related to the target cell (i.e., using MAC-CE as described in paragraphs 0026-0027, 0058, 0151, and 0155-0158).
Regarding claims 5, 26, 38, and 45, Fujishiro, Koskela, and Awoniyi-Oteri disclose all limitations recited within claims as described above. Fujishiro also discloses wherein the configuration message comprises at least one of a physical cell identity (“PCI”), reference signal (“RS”) ID related to a candidate cell, or a transmission configuration indicator (“TCI”) state ID related to the candidate cell (i.e., physical cell identifier as described in paragraph 0079).
Regarding claims 11, and 39, Fujishiro, Koskela, and Awoniyi-Oteri disclose all limitations recited within claims as described above. Fujishiro also discloses wherein further comprising at least one of:
applying a stored cell configuration of the target cell; or
performing a mobility from a current serving cell to the target cell (i.e., performing a handover as described in Abstract); or
starting a timer for the mobility upon triggering Layer 1 (L1)/L2-based inter-cell mobility, wherein the timer is a radio resource control ("RRC") layer timer T304.
Regarding claims 22, and 43, Fujishiro discloses a method for wireless communication, and a second wireless communications apparatus (i.e., eNB 200 as shown in Figs. 1 & 7) comprising:
sending, by a base station to user equipment (UE) (i.e., UE 100 and eNB 200 as shown in Figs. 1 & 7), a configuration message that includes a list of candidate cells each with a configuration and a candidate cell configuration index corresponding to the configuration (i.e., receiving by the UE 100 from source eNB 200S including a “Target Config list” that is a list of configuration information for each candidate cell as described in paragraphs 0059, and 0078-0079); and
receiving a communication at the target cell, based on the MAC CE command and the configuration of the target cell (i.e., receiving a communication in S112-S116 of Fig. 6, and as described in paragraphs 0098-0104).
Fujishiro, however, does not expressly disclose:
receiving, from the UE, a measurement report that comprises a Layer 1 (“L1”) measurement for at least one of the list of candidate cells; and
sending, to the UE, a medium access control (MAC) control element (CE) command comprising the candidate cell configuration index of a target cell of the list of candidate cells, a timing advance (TA) value related to the target cell, and a transmission configuration indicator (TCI) state of the target cell.
In a similar endeavor, Koskela discloses a base station and user equipment. Koskela also discloses:
receiving, from the UE, a measurement report that comprises a Layer 1 (“L1”) measurement for at least one of the list of candidate cells (i.e., base station 400 receives measurement report REP from the UE 200 comprising information characterizing the beam measurements related to the non-serving cell N-SRVC, which is the candidate cells of claim language, as described in paragraphs 0086-0088);
sending, to the UE, a medium access control (MAC) control element (CE) command (i.e., the UE 200 receives an instruction from base station 100 to switch to the non-serving cell N-SRVC as described in paragraphs 0089-0090 comprising the candidate cell configuration index of a target cell of the list of candidate cells, and a transmission configuration indicator (TCI) state of the target cell (i.e., the MAC CE signaling is used for instructing including TCI state as described in paragraphs 0091, and 0158-0159).
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art to modify the teachings of the cited references, and arrive at the present invention.
The motivation/suggestion for doing so would have been to get the UE get handover to another cell without service interruption.
The combination of Fujishiro and Koskela, however, does not expressly disclose:
sending, to the UE, a MAC-CE comprising a timing (TA) value related to the target cell.
Furthermore, Awoniyi-Oteri discloses UE measurement reporting in secondary cell group dormancy. Awoniyi-Oteri also discloses sending, to the UE, a MAC-CE comprising a timing (TA) value related to the target cell (i.e., the MAC-CE includes a timing advance (TA) command for the secondary cells as described in paragraphs 0011, 0022, and 0131).
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art to modify the teachings of the cited references, and arrive at the present invention.
The motivation/suggestion for doing so would have been to reduce interference and ensure reliable multi-cell uplink scheduling.
With further regard to claim 43, Koskela also discloses the second wireless communications apparatus (i.e., a base station 100 as shown in Fig. 1) comprising: a processor (i.e., a processor 102) and a memory (i.e., a memory 104), wherein the processor is configured to read code from the memory (i.e., a program 106 instructions stored in the memory 104 as described in paragraph 0086).
Claim(s) 13 and 40 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fujishiro in view of Koskela in view of Awoniyi-Oteri, and further in view of Zhang et al. (hereinafter “Zhang”, US 2022/0377622).
Regarding claims 13, and 40, Fujishiro, Koskela, and Awoniyi-Oteri disclose all limitations recited within claims as described above, but do not expressly disclose features of these claims.
In a similar endeavor, Zhang discloses a method for low layer inter-cell mobility management. Zhang also discloses wherein the timer is stopped when a L1/L2-based inter-cell mobility is informed as successful completion (i.e., when the handover is successful, the system stops the confirmation timer as described in paragraph 0085).
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art to modify the teachings of the cited references, and arrive at the present invention.
The motivation/suggestion for doing so would have been to enable the network to release the network resources.
Claim(s) 14 and 41 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fujishiro in view of Koskela in view of Awoniyi-Oteri, and further in view of Kim (US 2023/0397284).
Regarding claims 14, and 41, Fujishiro, Koskela, and Awoniyi-Oteri disclose all limitations recited within claims as described above, but do not expressly disclose features of these claims.
In a similar endeavor, Kim discloses a method and apparatus for managing link in wireless communication. Kim also discloses at least one of:
determining a failure for the mobility, based on expiration of the timer (i.e., UE declares RLF upon failure of handover when T304 timer expires as described in paragraph 0059); or
selecting another cell among the candidate cells to perform the mobility to the selected another cell.
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art to modify the teachings of the cited references, and arrive at the present invention.
The motivation/suggestion for doing so would have been to enable the network to optimize a cell area.
Claim(s) 17 and 42 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fujishiro in view of Koskela in view of Awoniyi-Oteri, and further in view of Tseng et al. (hereinafter “Tseng”, US 2023/0344508).
Regarding claims 17, and 42, Fujishiro, Koskela, and Awoniyi-Oteri disclose all limitations recited within claims as described above, but do not expressly disclose features of these claims.
In a similar endeavor, Tseng discloses a method of non-terrestrial network assistance information update procedure and related device. Tseng also discloses
removing a stored candidate cell configuration upon entering an IDLE state or upon receiving a RRC release message including an indication of a suspension of a RRC connection (i.e., the gNB can remove/suspend the candidate cells and corresponding trigger conditions/parameters via another RRC messages as described in paragraph 0096, and as shown in Table 1).
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art to modify the teachings of the cited references, and arrive at the present invention.
The motivation/suggestion for doing so would have been to ensure the UE could re-evaluate the network environment and select the best possible serving cell for optimal connection.
Conclusion
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WAYNE CAI whose telephone number is (571)272-7798. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday, 7:00 AM-5:00 PM.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, KATHY WANG-HURST can be reached on (571)270-5371. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/Wayne H Cai/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2644
Prosecution Insights