Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/778,865

FUNDUS BUMPER MECHANICAL REFERENCE FOR EASIER MECHANISM DEPLOYMENT

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Jul 19, 2024
Examiner
NGUYEN, CAMTU TRAN
Art Unit
3786
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Hologic Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allow Rate
534 granted / 850 resolved
-7.2% vs TC avg
Strong +39% interview lift
Without
With
+39.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
872
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§103
38.3%
-1.7% vs TC avg
§102
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
§112
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 850 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because line 5 recites the contracted configuration, applicant might have intended to recite the collapsed configuration. Appropriate correction is required. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP §§ 706.02(l)(1) - 706.02(l)(3) for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 1-11 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-10 of U.S. Application 11,712,292. Recitations from this instant application, #18/778,865 Recitations from U.S. Patent No. 11,712,292 Claim 1 recites: A method of seating an intrauterine ablation device within a uterus, the ablation device having an applicator head and a distal bumper, the applicator head having a collapsed configuration, and an expanded configuration, the method comprising: transcervically introducing the ablation device in the collapsed configuration into the uterus with the applicator head in the contracted configuration; advancing the ablation device within the uterus until the distal bumper contacts a fundal wall of the uterus; expanding the applicator head into the expanded configuration while maintaining contact between the distal bumper and the fundal wall; and further advancing the ablation device until the expanded applicator head contacts the fundal wall. Claim 1 recites: A method of positioning an intrauterine ablation device in a uterus, comprising: transcervically inserting a distal end portion of the intrauterine ablation device into the uterus, the distal end portion of the intrauterine ablation device comprising a first flexure distal free end, a second flexure distal free end, and a distal bumper disposed laterally therebetween, wherein a distal facing end of the distal bumper is distal to the first and second flexure distal free ends; advancing the distal end portion of the intrauterine ablation device within the uterus until the distal bumper contacts a fundal wall of the uterus; and while the distal bumper is contacting the fundal wall, manipulating the distal end portion of the intrauterine ablation device so that the respective first and second flexure distal free ends move laterally away from one another in opposite directions without engaging the fundal wall. Regarding claim 2, see claim 6 in U.S. Patent No. 11,712,292. Regarding claim 3, see claim 7 in U.S. Patent No. 11,712,292. Regarding claim 4, see claim 1 in U.S. Patent No. 11,712,292. Regarding claim 5, see claim 2 in U.S. Patent No. 11,712,292. Regarding claim 6, see claim 3 in U.S. Patent No. 11,712,292. Regarding claim 7, see claim 4 in U.S. Patent No. 11,712,292. Regarding claim 8, see claim 5 in U.S. Patent No. 11,712,292. Regarding claim 9, see claim 8 in U.S. Patent No. 11,712,292. Regarding claim 10, see claim 9 in U.S. Patent No. 11,712,292. Regarding claim 11, see claim 10 in U.S. Patent No. 11,712,292. Claims 12-19 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-5 of U.S. Application 11,712,292. Recitations from this instant application, #18/778,865 Recitations from U.S. Patent No. 11,712,292 Claim 12 recites: A method of positioning an intrauterine ablation device in a uterus, comprising: transcervically inserting a distal end portion of the intrauterine ablation device into the uterus, the distal end portion of the intrauterine ablation device comprising a first flexure having a first flexure distal free end, and a second flexure having a second flexure distal free end; advancing the distal end portion of the intrauterine ablation device within the uterus until the distal end portion contacts a fundal wall of the uterus; and while the distal end portion is contacting the fundal wall, manipulating the distal end portion of the intrauterine ablation device so that the respective first and second flexure distal free ends move laterally away from one another in opposite directions without engaging the fundal wall. Claim 1 recites: A method of positioning an intrauterine ablation device in a uterus, comprising: transcervically inserting a distal end portion of the intrauterine ablation device into the uterus, the distal end portion of the intrauterine ablation device comprising a first flexure distal free end, a second flexure distal free end, and a distal bumper disposed laterally therebetween, wherein a distal facing end of the distal bumper is distal to the first and second flexure distal free ends; advancing the distal end portion of the intrauterine ablation device within the uterus until the distal bumper contacts a fundal wall of the uterus; and while the distal bumper is contacting the fundal wall, manipulating the distal end portion of the intrauterine ablation device so that the respective first and second flexure distal free ends move laterally away from one another in opposite directions without engaging the fundal wall. Regarding claim 13, see claim 2 in U.S. Patent No. 11,712,292. Regarding claim 14, see claim 1 in U.S. Patent No. 11,712,292. Regarding claim 15, see claim 1 in U.S. Patent No. 11,712,292. Regarding claim 16, see claim 3 in U.S. Patent No. 11,712,292. Regarding claim 17, see claim 4 in U.S. Patent No. 11,712,292. Regarding claim 18, see claim 5 in U.S. Patent No. 11,712,292. Regarding claim 19, see claim 8 in U.S. Patent No. 11,712,292. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CAMTU TRAN NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-4799. The examiner can normally be reached 9am-5pm, Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rachael E Bredefeld can be reached at 571-270-5237. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CAMTU T NGUYEN/Examiner, Art Unit 3786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 19, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594138
BEARING STRUCTURE AND DRAPE UNIT INCLUDING BEARING STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12582484
AUTOMATIC PATIENT POSITIONING FOR MEDICAL EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575963
APPARATUS THAT ENABLES NON-PENETRATING SEX
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12569199
SKIN ADHESIVE PATCH WITH REFRESHABLE PERIMETER, AND RELATED DEVICE ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564520
GRADUATED COMPRESSION DEVICE FOR THE TREATMENT OF CIRCULATORY DISORDERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+39.0%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 850 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month