Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/779,091

INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jul 22, 2024
Priority
Mar 28, 2022 — JP 2022-052533 +1 more
Examiner
VAZ, JANICE EZVI
Art Unit
2667
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Fujifilm Corporation
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
58 granted / 76 resolved
+14.3% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
100
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
§103
48.0%
+8.0% vs TC avg
§102
30.7%
-9.3% vs TC avg
§112
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 76 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment This is in response to Applicant’s Arguments/Remarks filed on July 16th, 2026 which has been entered and made of record. Response to Arguments Claim Rejections – 35 USC§ 102/103 Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks, filed July 16th, 2026, with respect to Claims 1-10 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection of Claims 1-10 has been withdrawn. Particularly the arguments directed to the previously cited reference Themelis in light of the amendments, stating, “Themelis generates the patterned region based on the information of the region of interest only” (Remarks pg. 7), and “in contrast, as currently amended, claim 1 requires the operation [multiply accumulate operation including subtraction for a first spectral image] is performed based on color information set for each of the plurality of regions” (Remarks, pg. 8) is found to be persuasive. Status of Claims Claims 1-5, and 7-10 are pending. Claim(s) 1, 9, and 10 were amended. Claim 6 was canceled. No new claim(s) were added. Claims 1-5, and 7-10 are considered below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-5 and 7-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The specification, while describing generation of a pseudo color image based on processing of generated R channel, G channel, and B channel images based on spectral image processing (see at least specification [0085], [0169] and Figs. 2, 6, and 10), does not reasonably provide description for generation of a pseudo color image based on processing of any channel image. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-5 and 7-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. It is unclear what is meant by, “assigning a plurality of different spectral images to different channels” in Claims 1, 9, and 10. Does this mean each spectral image has to be assigned to a different channel i.e. channel image 1 formed by spectral image a, and channel image 2 formed by spectral image b? Does it mean no two channel images share the same spectral images i.e. image 1 formed by spectral image a and spectral image b, and image 2 formed by spectral image c and spectral image d? Does it mean spectral images can be assigned to individual channel images i.e. image 1 formed by spectral image a and spectral image b, and image 2 formed by spectral image a and spectral image b, as long as there exists spectral images that differ between each other i.e. spectral image a and spectral image b? Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JANICE VAZ whose telephone number is (703)756-4685. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Bella can be reached at (571) 272-7778. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JANICE E. VAZ/Examiner, Art Unit 2667 /MATTHEW C BELLA/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2667
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 22, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Jul 16, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12770415
LIGHT MICROSCOPY METHOD, DEVICE AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12762839
METHOD, APPARATUS AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM FOR PREDICTING TARGET OBJECT
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12754101
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MONITORING MOVING ELEMENTS
1y 8m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12749151
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MAXIMUM CONTRAST PROJECTION
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12738091
Adaptable Camera-based Contactless SpO2 Detection
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+20.3%)
3y 0m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 76 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month