Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/779,160

EXPANDABLE SPINAL FIXATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 22, 2024
Priority
Feb 02, 2016 — CIP of 9622793 +4 more
Examiner
GREEN, MICHELLE CHRISTINE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Globus Medical Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
730 granted / 877 resolved
+23.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
900
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
42.7%
+2.7% vs TC avg
§102
26.4%
-13.6% vs TC avg
§112
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 877 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 8-13, 18-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Taber et al. (U.S. Pub. No. 2014/0309695 A1, hereinafter “Taber”). Taber discloses, regarding claim 1, a fixation assembly (200, see Figs. 10A-D) comprising: an upper plate half (see annotated Fig. 10D below, note fixed and slidable upper plates and upper planar base) having an upper planar base (see annotated Fig. 10D below) with a first upper end (208) and a second upper end (300), wherein the first upper end includes a fixed upper plate extending upwardly (see annotated Fig. 10D below) and the second upper end includes a slidable upper plate extending upwardly and configured to be adjusted along the upper planar base (see Figs. 10C-D); a lower plate half (204); and an insert (240 or 328) configured to be inserted between the upper plate half and the lower plate half (see also annotated Fig. 10D below, note that the insert has been inserted into an opening of the upper plate half and extends between the upper plate half and lower plate half). PNG media_image1.png 606 572 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, wherein the fixed upper plate and the slidable upper plate contain upper spikes (132) to engage a spinous process (see Fig. 10D). Regarding claim 3, wherein the slidable upper plate engages the upper planar base via a dovetail connection (via 318, see Fig. 22, see also para. [0079]). Regarding claim 8, wherein the lower plate half (see annotated Fig. 10D above, note fixed and slidable lower plates and lower planar base) includes a lower planar base (see annotated Fig. 10D above) with a first lower end (210) and a second lower end (302), wherein the first lower end includes a fixed lower plate extending upwardly (see annotated Fig. 10D above) and the second lower end includes a slidable lower plate extending upwardly (see annotated Fig. 10D above) and configured to be adjusted along the lower planar base (see Figs. 10C-D). Regarding claim 9, wherein the fixed lower plate and the slidable lower plate contain lower spikes (132) to engage a spinous process (see Fig. 10D). Regarding claim 10, wherein the slidable lower plate engages the lower planar base via a dovetail connection (via 336, see Fig. 24, see also para. [0081]). Taber discloses, regarding claim 11, a method of fixating adjacent spinous processes (see para. [0039]), said method comprising: providing a fixation assembly (200, see Figs. 10A-D), wherein the fixation assembly includes: an upper plate half (see annotated Fig. 10D below, note fixed upper and slidable upper plates and upper planar base) having an upper planar base (see annotated Fig. 10D above) with a first upper end (208) and a second upper end (300), wherein the first upper end includes a fixed upper plate extending upwardly (see annotated Fig. 10D above) and the second upper end includes a slidable upper plate extending upwardly (see annotated Fig. 10D above) and configured to be adjusted along the upper planar base (see Figs. 10C-D); a lower plate half (see annotated Fig. 10 below, note fixed lower and slidable lower plates and lower planar base); and an insert (240 or 328) configured to be inserted between the upper plate half and the lower plate half (see annotated Fig. 10D above), inserting the upper plate half and lower plate half between the adjacent spinous processes (see Fig. 9, see para. [0062] “the spacer 102 of implant 100 has been replaced by four (4) arms 206”); inserting the insert between the upper plate half and the lower plate half (see annotated Fig. 10D above, note that the insert has been inserted into an opening of the upper plate half and extends between the upper plate half and lower plate half); and adjusting a distance between the fixed upper plate and the slidable upper plate to engage one of the adjacent spinous processes (see Fig. 10C, see also paras. [0079] and [0081], note sliding within cavities 322, 324 and 340, 324). Regarding claim 12, wherein the fixed upper plate and the slidable upper plate contain upper spikes (132, see Fig. 10D). Regarding claim 13, wherein the slidable upper plate engages the upper planar base via a dovetail connection (via 318, see Fig. 22, see also para. [0079]). Regarding claim 18, wherein the lower plate half (see annotated Fig. 10D above, note fixed and slidable lower plates and lower planar base) includes a lower planar base (see annotated Fig. 10D above) with a first lower end (302) and a second lower end (300), wherein the first lower end includes a fixed lower plate extending upwardly (see annotated Fig. 10D above) and the second lower end includes a slidable lower plate extending upwardly (see annotated Fig. 10D above) and configured to be adjusted along the lower planar base (see annotated Fig. 10D above). Regarding claim 19, wherein the fixed lower plate and the slidable lower plate contain lower spikes (132, see Fig. 10D) to engage a spinous process. Regarding claim 20, wherein the slidable lower plate engages the lower planar base via a dovetail connection (via 336, see Fig. 24, see also para. [0081]). Allowable Subject Matter Claim(s) 4-7, 14-17 is/are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The claims in the instant application have not been rejected using prior art because no references, or reasonable combination thereof, could be found which disclose, or suggest: A fixation assembly with an upper plate half with an upper planar base, a fixed upper plate and a slidable upper plate, and an insert; and as per claim 4, wherein the insert is a hollow parallelepiped shaped device having a top surface, a bottom surface, a posterior surface, an anterior surface, and opposing lateral surfaces. A method of fixating adjacent spinous processes comprising providing a fixation assembly with an upper plate half with an upper planar base, a fixed upper plate and a slidable upper plate, and an insert; and as per claim 14, wherein the insert is a hollow parallelepiped shaped device having a top surface, a bottom surface, a posterior surface, an anterior surface, and opposing lateral surfaces. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Michelle C. Green whose telephone number is (571)270-7051. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday between 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, please contact the examiner’s supervisor, Eduardo C. Robert, at (571) 272-4719. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /M.C.G/ Examiner, Art Unit 3773 /EDUARDO C ROBERT/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3773
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 22, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12702398
Independent Rod Suspension
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702444
REDUCTION SYSTEM FOR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702456
IMPLANT AND METHOD FOR LONG BONE FIXATION
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702453
INTERSPINOUS IMPLANT INSERTION INSTRUMENT WITH WING ACTUATION TOOL
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702450
COUPLING ASSEMBLY AND POLYAXIAL BONE ANCHORING DEVICE COMPRISING THE SAME
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+11.7%)
2y 7m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 877 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month