Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/779,331

METHOD FOR TRAINING A MACHINE LEARNING MODEL TO GENERATE A VOXEL-BASED 3D REPRESENTATION OF AN ENVIRONMENT OF A VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 22, 2024
Examiner
WU, CHONG
Art Unit
2613
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
416 granted / 484 resolved
+24.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
500
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
§103
41.0%
+1.0% vs TC avg
§102
7.6%
-32.4% vs TC avg
§112
29.1%
-10.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 484 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Status This Office Action is responsive to claims filed on 09/05/2024. Please note Claims 8-13 are pending and have been examined. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claim 8 is objected to because of the following informalities: “a deviation between the first input image data and and the second output image data” should be “a deviation between the first input image data and Claims 8-11 recite “2D” and “3D” multiple times. Applicant is suggested to clarify whether these terms correspond to “two-dimensional” and “three-dimensional”, respectively. Claim 12 and Claim 13 recite similar features of claim 8. Appropriate corrections are required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 8-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claim 8 recites “the trainable ML model” which lacks antecedent basis. It’s unclear whether “the trainable ML model” refers to the machine learning model in the preamble of this claim. Applicant is suggested to use consistent terminology when referring to a same limitation. Claim 8 recites “the generated 3D representation for the at least one voxel feature” which lacks antecedent basis. The claim merely recites generating a voxel-based 3D representation for the environment of the vehicle, but fails to disclose generating 3D representation for at least one voxel feature. Claim 8 recites “the generated 3D representation of the ML model” which lacks antecedent basis. This feature possibly refers to the 3D representation generated by using the ML model, not a 3D representation of the ML model. Claims 9-11 are dependent from claim 8 and are therefore rejected. Claim 12 and Claim 13 recite similar features of claim 8, and are therefore rejected. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8-13 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding Claim 8, Yi Wei (“SurroundOcc: Multi-Camera 3D Occupancy Prediction for Autonomous Driving”, published in IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 3/16/2023) discloses a method to “extract multi-scale features for each image and adopt spatial 2D-3D attention to lift them to the 3D volume space” and “progressively upsample the volume features and impose supervision on multiple levels”. In the same filed of endeavor, Horstmeyer (US 20230070475 A1) discloses “the fitting of the image representations into the volumetric representation can be accomplished by minimizing variations between the complex function representing the volumetric representation and the multiple complex functions representing the image representations”. However, claim 8 recites “…comparing the first input image data with the generated second output image data; and based on determining a deviation between the first input image data and and the second output image data, adjusting at least one parameter of the ML model to minimize the ascertained deviation and thus train the ML model and thus improve the generated 3D representation of the ML model”. The combination of these features with other limitations as cited in the claim are neither disclosed nor suggested by the prior art of record. Independent Claims 12 and 13 recite similar features of claim 8. Conclusion The following art is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Gigengack (US 20250022226 A1) corresponding to co-pending Application # 18766036 filed by the same inventor has been considered by the Examiner. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHONG WU whose telephone number is (571)270-5207. The examiner can normally be reached MON-FRI: 9AM-5PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Xiao Wu can be reached at 571-272-7761. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHONG WU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2613
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 22, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597215
REPRESENTING VIRTUAL OBJECTS OUTSIDE OF A DISPLAY SCREEN
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598286
DEPTH-VARYING REPROJECTION PASSTHROUGH IN VIDEO SEE-THROUGH (VST) EXTENDED REALITY (XR)
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597197
LOCAL SPACE TEXTURE MAPPING BASED ON REVERSE PROJECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592049
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DISPLAYING IMAGE IN VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592050
CHEATING DETERRENCE WITH VIRTUAL SCRATCH PAPER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+3.7%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 484 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month