Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/780,019

QUANTUMPROOF BLOCKCHAIN

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 22, 2024
Examiner
TRAN, VU V
Art Unit
2491
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Algo Consulting, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allow Rate
353 granted / 394 resolved
+31.6% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
409
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.0%
-30.0% vs TC avg
§103
46.8%
+6.8% vs TC avg
§102
16.8%
-23.2% vs TC avg
§112
16.1%
-23.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 394 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is in response to application 18/477,839 filed on September 29, 2023. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claims 13-32 are pending and herein considered. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 13, 18, 20, 21, 26, 28, 29 and 32 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Seewell et al. (Seewell) U.S. Pat. Number 12,423,682. Regarding claims 13, 21 and 29, Sewell disclose a system/method of maintaining a blockchain, comprising: maintaining a public key file configured to store one or more public keys used in a plurality of blockchain transactions, each of the one or more public keys associated with a respective one of one or more corresponding addresses of one or more users; (col. 9, Line 52-60] The filter may be constructed by obtaining an address hash from the selected user and/or a signature script from the selected user. The filter may be constructed from the address hash arising from a public key of the selected user and/or from a signature script arising from a public key the filter may be constructed so as to provide a hash of the master public key of the selected user. receiving a plurality of blockchain transactions, wherein the one or more users verified each of the plurality of blockchain transactions by; searching the public key file for a respective public key used to generate a respective blockchain transaction; ((col. 2; lines [[56-67]] Globally Unique Identifier (GUID) embedded, which is used to filter relevant multisignature transactions from the blockchain when scanning for ratings. It is further indicated that of these tagged multisignature transactions, only those with the Vendor's GUID signature; col. 9; lines [[53-59]] The filter may be constructed by obtaining an address hash from the selected user and/or a signature script from the selected user. The filter may be constructed from the address hash arising from a public key of the selected user and/or from a signature script arising from a public key of the selected user. The filter may be constructed so as to provide a hash of the master public key of the selected user. verifying the respective blockchain transaction based at least in part on the respective public key, wherein the respective public key is not stored with the verified blockchain transaction. (col. 3 lines 20-36) The rating system comprises: a storage system for storing transaction information of the digital currency; an interface for receiving an identifier of at least one account associated with the digital currency and a request for rating the transaction history of the at least one account; and a processor communicative with the storage system and the interface. The processor identifies transactions of the at least one account from the transaction information stored in the storage system and assesses the destination of the identified transactions to generate a rating for the at least one account. It is further disclosed that the rating system may assess the amount and age of the identified transactions and that the rating system may be useful, for example, for peer-to-peer digital currencies. The storage system does not appear to include the blockchain and also user specific transactions merely include the amount, date, and destination of the identified transactions. Regarding claims 18, 26. Sewell disclose the method of claim 13, wherein each of the one or more public keys is associated with a public key infrastructure (PKI) certificate. [[ col. lines (col. 15, Line 14-20] The vendor user has a wallet and the vendor user's wallet contains the information necessary to conduct transactions. This includes the public key and private key pair necessary for a transaction (col. 15, Line 56-60] A significant number of users may be involved in the contract structured and implemented using the DFA. Each of the users is associated with their pair of private and public keys which are used to facilitate the transaction. Regarding claims 20, 28 and 32; Sewell discloses the method of claim 20, 28 and 32, wherein at least one of the plurality of blockchain transactions is a financial transaction. (col. 15, Line 56-60] In one embodiment, each user can employ their Bitcoin wallet to retrieve the user related data from the blockchain and then process the aggregate user related data, which can then be displayed to the user through the wallet interface. This provides useful information to the user, in effect a customer user, on the counterpart user, a vendor user, which helps the user decide whether to enter into the offered transaction or not, amongst other possible benefits. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Regarding claims 19, 27, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Seewell et al. (Seewell) U.S. Pub. Number 12,423682 in view of Akiyama et al. (Akiyama) US Pat 12,423,682. Regarding claim 19, 27; Seewell discloses the method of claim 13. Seewell does not discloses which Akiyama discloses wherein each of the one or more public keys is a Rainbow public key (Akiyama: para [0012] other public-key cryptography includes knapsack cryptography and multivariate polynomial type cryptography. Knapsack cryptography uses, as a basis for security, the difficulty of the knapsack problem as an NP problem. Multivariate polynomial type cryptography is constructed by using the theory of field extensions and uses, as a basis for security, the solution problem of simultaneous equations. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teaching of Seewell to provide each of the one or more public keys is a Rainbow public key as taught by Akiyama. The motivation would be to provide basis for security whose security is based on the divisor finding problem of obtaining a divisor on an algebraic surface which is a difficult problem that has not been solved by contemporary mathematics. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 14-17, 22-25 and 30-31 would be allowable if rewritten to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Related Art The following prior art made of record and cited on PTO-892, but not relied upon, is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure: U.S. Pub. Number 2016/034989 A1 to Davis=Davis teaches a method for authorizing a blockchain-based transaction includes: receiving a transaction request, the request including a network identifier associated with a blockchain network, a transaction amount, and one of: a public key and an address identifier; generating an address identifier using at least the public key included in the received transaction request and one or more hashing algorithms if the received transaction request does not include an address identifier; generating a transaction message, the message including a first data element configured to store a transaction amount and a second data element reserved for private use, and the first data element includes a zero value and the second data element includes at least (i) the network identifier or an encoded value based on the network identifier, (ii) the address identifier, and (iii) the transaction amount; and transmitting the transaction message to a financial institution using a payment network. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VU V TRAN whose telephone number is (571)270-1708. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8 AM- 4 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Korzuch can be reached on 571-272-7589. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VU V TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2491
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 22, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598077
Dynamic Generation of Digital Certificate Requests
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587355
POLYNOMIAL EVALUATION UNDER FULLY HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587356
ACCELERATOR DEVICE AND OPERATING METHOD OF ACCELERATOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580750
MEDIA STREAM TRANSMISSION PROTECTION THROUGH QKD NETWORKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580928
SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATIC DETECTION OF DISTRIBUTED ATTACKS IN IOT DEVICES USING DECENTRALIZED DEEP LEARNING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+17.8%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 394 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month