Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/780,060

QUANTUMPROOF BLOCKCHAIN

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Jul 22, 2024
Examiner
TRAN, VU V
Art Unit
2491
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Algo Consulting, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allow Rate
353 granted / 394 resolved
+31.6% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
409
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.0%
-30.0% vs TC avg
§103
46.8%
+6.8% vs TC avg
§102
16.8%
-23.2% vs TC avg
§112
16.1%
-23.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 394 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is in response to application 18/780.060 filed on July 22, 2024. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claims 13-14 are pending and herein considered. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claim 13 is rejected under 35 USC § 101 as being directed to non-statutory subject matter. Claim 13 is rejected under 35 USC 101 because the claims are/is directed to an abstract idea without being integrated into a practical application nor being significantly more. Regarding claim 13, the claim recites the limitations “generating a system of m random quadratic polynomials Fi (xi, xn ), i=1,..,m, in a finite field in a predetermined number of n unknown variables, wherein the quadratic polynomials are of the form ayxiXj +Y biXi +c, wherein ay, bi, and c are random values from the finite field and wherein xi, xn denote the predetermined number of unknown variables; embedding data of the blockchain transaction into quadratic, linear and constant terms, ay, bi, c of the generated system of random quadratic polynomials Fi (xi, xn), i=1,..,m; solving the system Fi (xi, xn )=0, F2 (xi, xn )=0, ... , Fm (xi, xn )=0; certifying validity of the transaction using a solution of the system; and generating the new block.” Accordingly, the claims recite an abstract idea. This judicial exception is not integrated into a practical application. It’s noted that the claims recite additional element(s) (i.e., a system,). However, said additional elements are recited at a high-level of generality (i.e., as a system generating a new block associated with a blockchain transaction comprising: generating a system of m random quadratic polynomials Fi (xi, xn ), i=1,..,m, in a finite field in a predetermined number of n unknown variables, wherein the quadratic polynomials are of the formayxiXj +Y biXi +c, wherein ay, bi, and c are random values from the finite field and wherein xi, xn denote the predetermined number of unknown variables; embedding data of the blockchain transaction into quadratic, linear and constant terms, ay, bi, c of the generated system of random quadratic polynomials Fi (xi, xn ), i=1,..,m; solving the system Fi (xi, xn )=0, F2 (xi, xn )=0, ... , Fm (xi, xn )=0;certifying validity of the transaction using a solution of the system; and generating the new block are directed to an abstract idea as the claims recite mental and mathematical processes. Accordingly, the claims recite an abstract idea. This judicial exception is not integrated into a practical application. The claims do not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception because the additional elements when considered both individually and as an ordered combination do not amount to significantly more than the abstract idea. As mentioned above, although the claims recite additional elements, said elements taken individually or as a combination, do not result in the claim amounting to significantly more than the abstract idea because as the additional elements perform generic computer content distributing functions routinely used in information technology field solving the system Fi (xi, xn )=0, F2 (xi, xn )=0, ... , Fm (xi, xn )=0;certifying validity of the transaction using a solution of the system; and generating the new block.; in view of Berkheimer memo. Generic computer components recited as performing generic computer functions that are well understood, routine and conventional activities amount to no more than implementing the abstract idea with a computerized system. Therefore, the claim is directed to non-statutory subject matter. Claim 14 is also rejected under 35 U.S.C 101 as being directed to non-statutory subject matter for the same reasons addressed above as the claim is directed to an abstract idea without being integrated into a practical application, nor being significantly more. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VU V TRAN whose telephone number is (571)270-1708. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8 AM- 4 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor William Korzuch can be reached on 571-272-7589. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VU V TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2491
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 22, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598077
Dynamic Generation of Digital Certificate Requests
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587355
POLYNOMIAL EVALUATION UNDER FULLY HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587356
ACCELERATOR DEVICE AND OPERATING METHOD OF ACCELERATOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580750
MEDIA STREAM TRANSMISSION PROTECTION THROUGH QKD NETWORKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580928
SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATIC DETECTION OF DISTRIBUTED ATTACKS IN IOT DEVICES USING DECENTRALIZED DEEP LEARNING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+17.8%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 394 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month