Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/780,113

ELECTRONIC APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jul 22, 2024
Examiner
LEA EDMONDS, LISA S
Art Unit
2847
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Lenovo (Singapore) Pte. LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 10m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
658 granted / 759 resolved
+18.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
768
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
22.8%
-17.2% vs TC avg
§102
56.4%
+16.4% vs TC avg
§112
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 759 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 09/03/2024 was considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the fully open posture in which the first back surface and the second back surface face each other, and in a case in which the posture of the chassis is the fully open posture, the first magnetic attraction portion and the second magnetic attraction portion are adjacent to each other in a direction in which the first back surface and the second back surface face each other must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1, 2, and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The specification fails to disclose how the pen-shaped device leaves the first attraction position and moves to the second attraction position as claimed. Therefore, no art can be applied to claims 1, 2, and 5 at this time. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – Claim(s) 3 and 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lee et al. (11281254). With respect to claim 3, Lee et al. discloses an electronic apparatus (200) comprising: a chassis including a first chassis (220) having a first facing surface (224) and a second chassis (230) having a second facing surface (234); a first magnetic attraction portion (310) provided in the first chassis (220) and configured to generate a magnetic force; and a second magnetic attraction portion (320) provided in the second chassis (230) and configured to generate a magnetic force, wherein a posture of the chassis is switchable between a closed posture in which the first facing surface and the second facing surface face each other and an open posture in which the first facing surface and the second facing surface do not face each other, the magnetic force generated by the second magnetic attraction portion (320) is larger than the magnetic force generated by the first magnetic attraction portion, and in a case in which the posture of the chassis is the closed posture, the first magnetic attraction portion (310) and the second magnetic attraction portion (320) are adjacent to each other in a direction in which the first facing surface and the second facing surface face each other. With respect to claim 4, Lee et al. discloses the electronic apparatus (200) according to claim 3, wherein the first chassis (220) has a first back surface located on a side opposite to the first facing surface (224), the second chassis (230) has a second back surface located on a side opposite to the second facing surface (234), the posture of the chassis is switchable among the open posture, the closed posture, and a fully open posture in which the first back surface and the second back surface face each other, and in a case in which the posture of the chassis is the fully open posture, the first magnetic attraction portion (310) and the second magnetic attraction portion (320) are adjacent to each other in a direction in which the first back surface and the second back surface face each other. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LISA LEA-EDMONDS whose telephone number is (571)272-2043. The examiner can normally be reached M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Thompson can be reached at 571-272-2342. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. LISA LEA-EDMONDS Primary Examiner Art Unit 2847 /LISA LEA-EDMONDS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2847 2026-01-24
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 22, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Feb 04, 2026
Interview Requested
Feb 17, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 17, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 03, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602075
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12591275
SUPPORT AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME, FLEXIBLE DISPLAY MODULE, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591269
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585306
DEVICE TO ALLOW SENSORS T0 OPERATE WHEN LID IS CLOSED
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578756
DISPLAY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+8.7%)
1y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 759 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month