Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 18/780,261

Reversible Drop Case Assemblies for Snowmobiles

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 22, 2024
Examiner
HYMEL, ABIGAIL R
Art Unit
3611
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Arctic Cat Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
98 granted / 118 resolved
+31.1% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
130
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
40.4%
+0.4% vs TC avg
§102
26.5%
-13.5% vs TC avg
§112
28.9%
-11.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 118 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 5 is objected to for the following minor informalities: Line 3 should read: “the input selector collar is disengaged from the forward input pulley” for the purpose of grammatical clarity. Claim 9 is objected to for the following informalities: Line 5 should read: “the output pulley is reversibly rotatable in a first rotational direction” for the purpose of grammatical clarity. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 9-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 9 recites an idler output pulley in line 2, a reversible output pulley in line 3, and the output pulley in lines 4 and 5 which renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear if the recitation of “the output pulley” refers to the idler output pulley, the reversible output pulley, or a third output pulley. The output pulley is also recited in claim 10, lines 1-2, claim 11 line 1, claim 12 lines 2 and 3, claim 13 line 4, claim 14 line 3, claim 15 line 4, and claim 16 line 3. Claims 10-16 depend from claim 9. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-8 and 17-20 are allowed. Independent claims 1 and 17 recite an input selector collar between the forward input pulley and the reverse input gear. The collar slides along a common input axis into a forward mode position where it engages with the forward input pulley and a reverse mode position where it engages with the reverse input gear. The forward input pulley and the reverse input gear are required to be rotatably coupled to the gearbox input shaft. The closest prior art of record, Pard (US 11,415,207 B2) teaches a snowmobile with a reverse gear operation for when the engine does not have a reverse function. However, Pard teaches a reverse drive gear 246 with a support collar 256, where the reverse drive gear itself slides along the input shaft 165 to select from forward or reverse modes (Column 14 lines 56-67: “The actuator 260 is controlled by the user via the control element 150 to operate the gearbox 170 in either a “forward operation mode” or a “reverse operation mode”. […] More particularly, when the control element 150 is controlled by the user to engage the forward operation mode of the gearbox 170, the actuator 260 moves the reverse drive gear 246 along the countershaft 165 such that the dog teeth 252, 254 of the reverse and forward drive gears 246, 184 are engaged with one another thereby transmitting rotary motion from the reverse drive gear 246 to the forward drive gear 184.” Underline added for clarity. See also Column 15 lines 18-42 for a description of the reverse mode). There is no teaching, suggestion, or motivation to replace the movement of the reverse drive gear in Pard with an input selector collar nor would it be obvious to do so. Additional art was not found to teach the limitations as claimed, especially regarding the input selector collar, gear, and pulley arrangement. Claims 2-16 depend from claim 1. Claims 18-20 depend from claim 17. Claims 9-16 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Koynov (US 2026/0008517 A1) teaches a snowmobile transmission with a separate reverse gear axle. Voges (US 2024/0410446 A1) teaches a reverse drive system for a motor vehicle with a separate reverse drive motor. Penttila (US 2010/0275713 A1) teaches a gear shifting arrangement for off-road vehicle’s such as snowmobiles with forward and reverse gears. Schoenfelder (US 7063639 B2) teaches a snowmobile planetary drive system with a reversing unit. Wysocki (5,038,881) teaches a snowmobile with a power transfer gear on a coupler attached to the output shaft. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ABIGAIL R HYMEL whose telephone number is (571)272-0389. The examiner can normally be reached Generally M-F 7:30-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Valentin Neacsu can be reached at (571)272-6265. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ABIGAIL R HYMEL/Examiner, Art Unit 3611
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 22, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12673524
REAR ARRANGEMENT FOR A VEHICLE
4y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12559159
STEER-BY-WIRE STEERING APPARATUS
3y 11m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12534152
DEVICES AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLING THE POWER OF A VEHICLE MOTOR
3y 9m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12509168
TORQUE-LIMITING END EFFECTOR
4y 7m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12458548
WHEELCHAIR WITH EMERGENCY BRAKE SYSTEM
5m to grant Granted Nov 04, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+18.5%)
2y 10m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 118 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month