Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/780,307

ELECTRONIC DEVICES THAT DETECT ACCESSORY DEVICES AT MULTIPLE LOCATIONS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 22, 2024
Examiner
LEA EDMONDS, LISA S
Art Unit
2847
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Apple INC.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 10m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
658 granted / 759 resolved
+18.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
768
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
22.8%
-17.2% vs TC avg
§102
56.4%
+16.4% vs TC avg
§112
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 759 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5, 8-14, 17, 19, and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Pinciuc et al. (11775006). With respect to claim 1, Pinciuc et al. discloses an electronic device (100, 1400), comprising: a housing (102); a display (104, 1420) carried by the housing (102); and a sensor (140a, 140b, 1430) positioned between the housing (102) and the display (104, 1420), the sensor (140a, 140b, 1430) configured to detect an accessory device (200) covering the housing (102) and the display (104, 1420). With respect to claim 2, Pinciuc et al. discloses the electronic device (100, 1400) of claim 1, wherein the sensor (140a, 140b, 1430) comprises a magnetic field sensor configured to detect: a first magnetic flux, in a first direction, from a first magnet and from a second magnet of the accessory device, and a second magnetic flux, in a second direction, from the first magnet and from the second magnet, the second direction different from the first direction. With respect to claim 3, Pinciuc et al. discloses the electronic device (100, 1400) of claim 2, further comprising one or more processors (1410) configured to determine, based on detection by the sensor (140a, 140b, 1430) of the first magnetic flux in the first direction, the accessory device (200) is covering the display (104, 1420) and the housing 102). With respect to claim 4, Pinciuc et al. discloses the electronic device (100, 1400) of claim 3, wherein the one or more processors (1410) are further configured to determine, based on detection by the sensor (140a, 140b, 1430) of the second magnetic flux in the second direction, the accessory device (200) is covering the housing (102) and not the display (104, 1420). With respect to claim 5, Pinciuc et al. discloses the electronic device (100, 1400) of claim 3, wherein the one or more processors (1410) are further configured to deactivate the display (102, 1420) based on detection by the sensor (140a, 140b, 1430) of the first magnetic flux in the first direction. With respect to claim 8, Pinciuc et al. discloses the electronic device (100, 1400) of claim 2, wherein the magnetic field sensor (140a, 140b, 1430) comprises a single magnetic field sensor. With respect to claim 9, Pinciuc et al discloses an electronic device (100, 1400), comprising: a housing (102); a display (104, 1420) carried by the housing; a sensor (140a, 140b, 1430) positioned between the housing (102) and the display (104, 1420); and one or more processors (1410) electrically coupled to the display (104, 1420) and the sensor (140a, 140b, 1430), the one or more processors (1410) configured to: determine, based on a first output from the sensor (140a, 140b, 1430), an accessory device (200) is covering the display (104, 1420) and the housing (102), and determine, based on a second output from the sensor (140a, 140b, 1430), the accessory device (200) is covering the housing (102) and not the display (104, 1420). With respect to claim 10, Pinciuc et al. discloses the electronic device (100, 1400) of claim 9, wherein the sensor (140a, 140b, 1430) is configured to: provide the first output based on detection of a first magnetic field from a first magnet and from a second magnet of the accessory device, and provide the second output based on detection of a second magnetic field from the first magnet and from the second magnet. With respect to claim 11, Pinciuc et al discloses the electronic device (100, 1400) of claim 10, wherein the sensor (140a, 140b, 1430) is configured to: detect the first magnetic field in a first direction, and detect the second magnetic field in a second direction different from the first direction. With respect to claim 12, Pinciuc et al. discloses the electronic device (100, 1400) of claim 9, wherein the one or more processors (1410) are configured to deactivate the display (104, 1420) based on receiving the first output from the sensor (140a, 140b, 1430). With respect to claim 13, Pinciuc et al. discloses the electronic device (100, 1400) of claim 9, wherein the one or more processors (1410) are configured to determine, based on the second output from the sensor (140a, 140b, 1430), a first section of the accessory device (200) is covered by a second portion of the accessory device (200). With respect to claim 14, Pinciuc et al. discloses the electronic device (100) of claim 9, wherein the sensor (140a, 140b, 1400) comprises a magnetic field sensor configured to determine magnetic flux in different directions. With respect to claim 17, Pinciuc et al. discloses an electronic device (100, 1400), comprising: a housing (102); a display (104, 1420) carried by the housing (102); a camera assembly (115); a sensor (140a, 140b, 1430) positioned between the housing (102) and the display (104, 1420); and one or more processors (1410) configured to: determine, based on a first output from the sensor (140a, 140b, 1430), an accessory device (200) is covering the display (104, 1420), the camera assembly (115), and the housing (102), determine, based on a second output from the sensor (140a, 140b, 1430), the accessory device (200) is covering the housing (102) and not the display (104, 1420) and not the camera assembly (115), and activate, based on the second output, a software application configured to utilize the camera assembly (115). With respect to claim 19, Pinciuc et al. discloses the electronic device (100, 1400) of claim 17, wherein the camera assembly (115) comprises a front camera (116a) configured to capture an image of an environment facing the display (104, 1420). With respect to claim 20, Pinciuc et al. discloses the electronic device (100, 1400) of claim 17, wherein the camera assembly (115) comprises a rear camera (116b, 116c) configured to capture an image of an environment facing the housing (102). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6, 7, 15, 16, and 18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: as to claims 6 and 7, patentability resides in the at least one processor of the one or more processors is configured to operate in accordance with a first temperature limit based on detection by the sensor of the first magnetic flux in the first direction, and based on detection by the sensor) of the second magnetic flux in the second direction, the at least one processor is configured to operate in accordance with a second temperature limit different from the first temperature limit as claimed and including all of the other limitations of the base claim(s) respectfully; as to claims 15 and 16; patentability resides in the at least one processor of the one or more processors is configured to operate in accordance with a first temperature limit, and based on the second output, the at least one processor is configured to operate in accordance with a second temperature limit different from the first temperature limit as claimed and including all of the other limitations of the base claim(s) respectfully; as to claim 18 patentability resides in the at least one processor of the one or more processors is configured to operate in accordance with a first temperature limit based on the first output, and based on the second output, the at least one processor is configured to operate in accordance with a second temperature limit greater than the first temperature limit as claimed and including all of the other limitations of the base claim(s) respectfully. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LISA LEA-EDMONDS whose telephone number is (571)272-2043. The examiner can normally be reached M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Thompson can be reached at 571-272-2342. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. LISA LEA-EDMONDS Primary Examiner Art Unit 2847 /LISA LEA-EDMONDS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2847 2026-02-07
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 22, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 03, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 03, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Mar 05, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 05, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 24, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602075
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12591275
SUPPORT AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME, FLEXIBLE DISPLAY MODULE, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591269
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585306
DEVICE TO ALLOW SENSORS T0 OPERATE WHEN LID IS CLOSED
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578756
DISPLAY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+8.7%)
1y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 759 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month