Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/780,368

METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING SIDELINK FEEDBACK CHANNELS, TERMINAL, AND CHIP

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 22, 2024
Priority
Jan 24, 2022 — continuation of PCTCN2022073592
Examiner
SMITH, MARCUS
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
436 granted / 564 resolved
+17.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
6 currently pending
Career history
569
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
69.8%
+29.8% vs TC avg
§102
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
§112
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 564 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-5, 10-12, 14-18, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee et al. (US 2022/0248425) in view of Deng et al. (US 2024/0421876). With regard to claims 1, 14, and 20, Lee teaches: A method (see figure 16)/ A chip (see figure 20L paragraph 269)/ A terminal (see figure 22), comprising: a processor (see paragraphs 282-284), a transceiver connected to the processor (see paragraphs 282-284), and a memory storing one or more executable instructions of the processor (see paragraphs 282-284); wherein the processor, when loading and executing the one or more executable instructions, is caused to (see paragraphs 282-284): in a case that N1 first sidelink feedback channels and N2 second sidelink feedback channels overlap in a time domain (see figure 13: paragraphs 153-160), determine, based on priorities of the N1 first sidelink feedback channels and priorities of the N2 second sidelink feedback channels, to transmit the first sidelink feedback channels or receive the second sidelink feedback channels (see step 1630 in figure 16: paragraphs 214-215, also see paragraphs 163-166), wherein N1 and N2 are both positive integers (paragraphs 154, 164, and 214) [0214] In step S1630, a transmitting UE may determine a priority between transmissions of a plurality of first PSFCHs and receptions of a plurality of second PSFCHs. For example, when a plurality of first PSFCH transmissions and a plurality of second PSFCH receptions overlap in the time domain, a transmitting UE may determine a priority between receptions of a plurality of first PSFCHs and transmissions of a plurality of second PSFCHs. For example, a plurality of first PSFCH transmissions may be an operation of transmitting a plurality of HARQ feedbacks corresponding to a plurality of first PSSCHs to a first receiving UE through a plurality of first PSFCHs. For example, a plurality second PSFCH receptions may be an operation of receiving a plurality of HARQ feedbacks corresponding to a plurality of second PSSCHs from a second reception UE through a plurality of second PSFCHs. [0215] For example, a transmitting UE may determine a higher priority among a plurality of first PSFCH transmissions or a plurality of second PSFCH receptions, based on the highest priority related to transmissions of a plurality of first PSFCHs and the highest priority related to receptions of a plurality of second PSFCHs. For example, a plurality of priorities related to transmissions of a plurality of first PSFCHs may be a plurality of priorities related to receptions of a plurality of first PSSCHs. For example, a plurality of priorities related to receptions of a plurality of first PSSCHs may be included in a plurality of SCIs received through a plurality of first PSCCHs. For example, a plurality of priorities related to receptions of a plurality of second PSFCHs may be a plurality of priorities related to transmissions of a plurality of second PSSCHs. For example, a plurality of priorities related to transmissions of a plurality of second PSSCHs may be included in a plurality of SCIs transmitted through a plurality of second PSCCHs. For example, an SCI format may be SCI format 1-A. For example, the lower a priority value included in an SCI format 1-A, the higher the priority may be. ); transmit at least one of the N1 first sidelink feedback channels using “antenna ports” (paragraphs 274, 278, and 280) in response to determining to transmit the first sidelink feedback channels (see step 1640 in figure 16: paragraphs 215-216, also see paragraphs 149- 150: [0216] In step S1640, a transmitting UE may perform a plurality of first PSFCH transmissions or may perform a plurality of second PSFCH receptions. For example, when a highest priority related to transmissions of a plurality of first PSFCHs is higher than a highest priority related to receptions of a plurality of second PSFCHs, a transmitting UE may transmit a plurality of first PSFCHs to a first receiving UE. [0217] For example, when the difference in transmit power between a plurality of first PSFCH transmissions is less than or equal to a pre-configured threshold, a transmitting UE may transmit a plurality of first PSFCHs to a first receiving UE. For example, when the separation distance in the frequency domain related to transmission of a plurality of first PSFCHs is less than a pre-configured threshold value, a transmitting UE may transmit a plurality of first PSFCHs to a first receiving UE. For example, when the number of a plurality of first PSFCH transmissions is less than or equal to a pre-configured threshold, a transmitting UE may transmit a plurality of first PSFCHs to a first receiving UE. For example, a transmitting UE may transmit a plurality of first PSFCHs to a first receiving UE, from a first PSFCH transmission with the highest priority in descending order related to a priority. ); and receive at least one of the N2 second sidelink feedback channels using “antenna ports” in response to determining to receive the second sidelink feedback channels (see step 1640 in figure 16: paragraphs 215-216, also see paragraph 149-150: [0149] Referring to FIG. 12, in step S1210, a transmitting UE may transmit a plurality of sidelink information to a receiving UE. In step S1220, a receiving UE may select or determine a PSFCH resource related to a plurality of received sidelink information. In step S1230, a receiving UE may transmit one or more HARQ feedback information to a transmitting UE using a selected or determined PSFCH resource. A method for a receiving UE to transmit a plurality of PSFCHs at the same time and/or to omit a PSFCH transmission or reception operation will be described according to various embodiments of the present disclosure. [0150] Hereinafter, in some situations (Case A to Case C), a receiving UE may perform a plurality of PSFCH transmissions at the same time and/or omit a PSFCH transmission or a reception operation. Hereinafter, in some situations (Case A to Case C), a receiving UE may perform a plurality of PSFCH transmissions at the same time and omit a plurality of PSFCH receptions, or may omit a plurality of PSFCH transmissions and perform a plurality of PSFCH receptions. He ); PNG media_image1.png 355 572 media_image1.png Greyscale Although Lee explicitly teaches radio signals are transmitted through antenna ports/transceivers (paragraph 280), Lee does not explicitly state sidelink feedback channel is using a first spatial domain filter for transmission or reception. Thus, it fails teach transmit at least one of the N1 first sidelink feedback channels using a first spatial domain transmission filter and receive at least one of the N2 second sidelink feedback channels using a first spatial domain reception filter, wherein the first spatial domain transmission filter corresponds to a spatial domain transmission filter of one of the N1 first sidelink feedback channels, and the first spatial domain reception filter corresponds to a spatial domain reception filter of one of the N2 second sidelink feedback channels. Similar to the system of Lee, Deng teaches PSFCH transmission. Deng teaches the PSFCH transmission and PSFCH reception can communicated with spatial domain filter (paragraphs 137, 147, 174-177). Deng explicitly teaches selecting PSFCH based on priority information. D1—WTRU Determination of a SL TCI State Associated with a PSFCH Transmission [0174] A RX WTRU may determine to use a spatial domain filter for a PSFCH transmission carrying a HARQ feedback based on the SL TCI state associated with the SL identification information coupling with the SL identification of the SL TB received in the PSSCH corresponding to the HARQ feedback when the HARQ feedback is HARQ ACK. As PSCCH/PSSCH is received correctly, a RX WTRU may consider the same spatial domain filter to receive may be used for the transmission to the TX WTRU. [0175] When the HARQ feedback is HARQ NACK, a RX WTRU may consider the same spatial domain filter to receive may be not be optimal for the transmission to the TX WTRU. A RX WTRU may determine to use a spatial domain filter indicated by a default TCI state for the PSFCH transmission of HARQ NACK. In another embodiment, a RX WTRU may use a set of (pre)configured spatial domain filter for the PSFCH transmission of NACK. D2—WTRU Prioritization for Transmitting Multiple PSFCH Transmissions with Conflicting SL TCI State [0176] When the spatial coverage of different spatial domain filters determined for PSFCH transmissions in the same SL slot do not overlap, a TX WTRU may not simultaneously perform these PSFCH transmissions. A spatial conflict may occur when multiple transmissions are performed at non- or partial-overlapping angle of departure (AoD). A TX WTRU may determine such a spatial conflict between PSFCH transmissions based on the configuration of the associated spatial domain filter. [0177] In one embodiment, when a TX WTRU determines such a conflict, a TX WTRU may perform a prioritization based on the priorities indicated in the SCIs associated with the PSSCH transmission corresponding to the HARQ feedback. A TX WTRU may perform a PSFCH transmission associated with a SL TB with the highest priority. In case of multiple SL TBs with the highest priority, a TX WTRU may randomly select one of the corresponding PSFCH transmissions. In another embodiment, a TX WTRU may perform all PSFCH transmissions in the SL slot using a spatial domain filter indicated by a default TCI state. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time before the effective filing date of the claim invention to process of transmitting sidelink feedback and receiving sidelink feedback channels using a first spatial domain filter, wherein the first spatial domain transmission filter corresponds to a spatial domain transmission filter of one of the N1 first sidelink feedback channels, and the first spatial domain reception filter corresponds to a spatial domain reception filter of one of the N2 second sidelink feedback channels as taught by Deng in the PSFCH communication system of Lee in order to improve interference management (Deng: paragraph 44). With regard to claims 2, and 15, Lee teaches:wherein determining, based on the priorities of the N1 first sidelink feedback channels and the priorities of the N2 second sidelink feedback channels, to transmit the first sidelink feedback channels or receive the second sidelink feedback channels comprises: determining a priority value P1 corresponding to a highest priority of the N1 first sidelink feedback channels and a priority value P2 corresponding to a highest priority of the N2 second sidelink feedback channels, wherein P1 and P2 are both integers; determining to transmit the first sidelink feedback channels in response to the priority value P1 being less than the priority value P2; and determining to receive the second sidelink feedback channels in response to the priority value P1 being greater than the priority value P2 (see paragraphs 208-209 and 230-236). With regard to claims 3, and 16, Deng also teaches: wherein transmitting at least one of the N1 first sidelink feedback channels using the first spatial domain transmission filter in response to determining to transmit the first sidelink feedback channels comprises: determining the first spatial domain transmission filter corresponding to the first sidelink feedback channel with a highest priority in response to determining to transmit the first sidelink feedback channels; determining NTx,PSFCH first sidelink feedback channels from the N1 first sidelink feedback channels using the first spatial domain transmission filter, wherein NTx,PSFCH is less than or equal to N1; and transmitting the NTx,PSFCH first sidelink feedback channels using the first spatial domain transmission filter (Deng, see paragraph 177: Prioritization for PSFCH transmission. Also see rule 1 through rule 7 in Lee reference. paragraphs 171, 181-195). With regard to claims 4, and 17, Deng also teaches: wherein determining the NTx,PSFCH first sidelink feedback channels from the N1 first sidelink feedback channels using the first spatial domain transmission filter comprises: determining Nsch,Tx,PSFCH' first sidelink feedback channels corresponding to the first spatial domain transmission filter from the N1 first sidelink feedback channels; and determining the NTx,PSFCH first sidelink feedback channels from the Nsch,Tx,PSFCH' first sidelink feedback channels, wherein Nsch,Tx,PSFCH' is less than or equal to N1 and is greater than or equal to NTx,PSFCH (see paragraphs 174-177: also see figure 6. Also see rule 1 through rule 7 in Lee reference. paragraphs 171, 181-195). PNG media_image2.png 545 835 media_image2.png Greyscale With regard to claims 5, and 18, Deng also teaches: wherein determining the NTx,PSFCH first sidelink feedback channels from the Nsch,Tx,PSFCH' first sidelink feedback channels comprises: determining the NTx,PSFCH first sidelink feedback channels from the Nsch,Tx,PSFCH' first sidelink feedback channels based on first information; wherein the first information comprises at least one of: the priorities of the N1 first sidelink feedback channels (paragaphs 173, 177) ; a maximum number Nmax,PSFCH of simultaneously transmitted first sidelink feedback channels, wherein Nmax,PSFCH is a positive integer; a maximum transmit power PCMAX; or indication information indicating whether to perform power control based on a downlink path loss. With regard to claims 10, Deng also teaches: , wherein receiving at least one of the N2 second sidelink feedback channels using the first spatial domain reception filter comprises: determining the first spatial domain reception filter corresponding to the second sidelink feedback channel with a highest priority in response to determining to receive the second sidelink feedback channels; determining NRx,PSFCH second sidelink feedback channels using the first spatial domain reception filter; and receiving the NRx,PSFCH second sidelink feedback channels using the first spatial domain reception filter (see paragraphs 171-173 of Deng. Also paragraphs 248-251 in the Lee reference: C3—WTRU Prioritization in a SL Slot Associated with Conflicting SL TCI State [0171] A WTRU may receive multiple PSCCH/PSSCH resource reservations for SL TBs with different SL identification information that may reserve resources in the same SL slot. A WTRU may associate the SL slot with multiple SL identification information indicated in the SCI reserving the resources or SL TCI states associated with multiple coupling SL identification information. [0172] When the spatial coverage of the spatial domain filters do not overlap, a RX WTRU may not simultaneously apply such different spatial domain filter in one SL slot to receive SL TBs from different WTRUs. Such a conflict resulted from using different spatial domain filters to receive from different WTRUs may be referred to as spatial conflict in this document. A spatial conflict may occur when multiple transmissions arrive at non- or partial-overlapping angle of arrival (AoA). A RX WTRU may determine such a spatial conflict between receptions based on the configuration of the associated spatial domain filter. [0173] In one embodiment, when a RX WTRU determines a spatial conflict, a RX WTRU may perform a prioritization based on the priorities indicated in the SCIs reserving the resources in the SL slot. A RX WTRU may use the spatial domain filter associated the SL identification of a SL TB with the highest priority (711—Yes, step 712). In case of multiple SL TBs with the highest priority, a RX WTRU may randomly select one of the SL TB and perform reception in the SL slot using the spatial domain filter associated with the SL identification information of the SL TB. In another embodiment, a RX WTRU may perform a reception in the SL slot using a spatial domain filter indicated by a default TCI state. Also, a RX WTRU may perform a PSFCH transmission to indicate the spatial conflict to one or multiple of the TX WTRUs. A RX WTRU may indicate the type of the conflict in the PSFCH and request a resource re-selection in a different SL slot. ). With regard to claim 11, Deng also teaches: wherein determining the NRx,PSFCH second sidelink feedback channels using the first spatial domain reception filter comprises: determining Nsch,Rx,PSFCH' second sidelink feedback channels corresponding to the first spatial domain reception filter from the N2 second sidelink feedback channels; and determining the NRx,PSFCH second sidelink feedback channels from the Nsch,Rx,PSFCH' second sidelink feedback channels (see paragraphs 171-175). With regard to claim 12,Deng also teaches: wherein determining the NRx,PSFCH second sidelink feedback channels from the Nsch,Rx,PSFCH' second sidelink feedback channels comprises: determining the NRx,PSFCH second sidelink feedback channels from the Nsch,Rx,PSFCH' second sidelink feedback channels based on second information (see paragraphs 171-175), wherein the second information comprises at least one of: the priorities of the N2 second sidelink feedback channels (see paragraphs 171-175); or a maximum number Nmax,Rx,PSFCH of simultaneously received second sidelink feedback channels, wherein Nmax,Rx,PSFCH is a positive integer. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6-9, 13, and 19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Wang et al. (US 2024/0172190), which disclose multiple PSFCH transmission/reception process (see figure 5). He et al. (US 2024/0007230), which disclosed PSFCH transmission/reception process (see figure 30 and figure 31). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARCUS R SMITH whose telephone number is (571)270-1096. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00 AM -5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Deborah J Reynolds can be reached at (571) 272-0734. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MARCUS SMITH/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2468
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 22, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12665702
NETWORK CODING IN AUTOMATIC RECEIPT REQUEST
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12641602
PACKET RETRANSMISSION USING A SEMI-PERSISTENT SCHEDULING OCCASION
3y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12634093
DYNAMIC LOCATION TONE RESERVATION
3y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12557147
RANDOM ACCESS METHOD, BASE STATION, USER EQUIPMENT, DEVICE AND MEDIUM
3y 4m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12218844
TAPPING NETWORK DATA TO PERFORM LOAD BALANCING
3y 6m to grant Granted Feb 04, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+11.6%)
3y 3m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 564 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month