Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/780,397

Splash plate for bathtub

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 22, 2024
Examiner
SKUBINNA, CHRISTINE J
Art Unit
3754
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allow Rate
600 granted / 977 resolved
-8.6% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
1004
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
47.9%
+7.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
§112
19.8%
-20.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 977 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is responsive to application number 18/780,397 - SPLASH PLATE FOR BATHTUB, filed on 7/22/24. Claims 1-10 are pending. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: The claim should end in a (single) period, an additional period appears in line 7. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 3, line 2, after slider… should read –is--. Claim 4, a moveable components is grammatically incorrect for singular usage of element 53. Claim 7, “comprises foot” is grammatically incorrect. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, line 1, the second occurrence of “two side panels” is indefinite as it is unclear if this is a new set of two side panels or the previously introduced, two side panels. Regarding claim 1, line 4, the introduction of “a second connection block” is indefinite as a first connection block has not been introduced. Regarding claim 1, “a plurality of suction first cups” is indefinite as it is unclear is the same as “a first suction cup assembly”. Regarding claim 1, “a second suction cup assembly” is indefinite as a first suction cup assembly has not been introduced. Regarding claim 1, “the first connection block” lacks antecedent basis in the claim. Regarding claim 1, line 8, “a second suction cup assembly” is indefinite as it is unclear if this is the same second suction cup assembly previously recited. Regarding claim 1, line 8, “a first suction cup assembly” is indefinite as it is unclear if this is the same first suction cup assembly previously recited. Regarding claim 2, line 3, “the inner cavity of the first slide” lacks antecedent basis in the claim. Regarding claim 3, as it depends from claim 1, lines 2-3; “the inner cavity of the first slide” lacks antecedent basis in the claim. Regarding claim 4, “the second suction cup assemble” lacks antecedent basis in the claims. Regarding claim 4, line 3, “the adjacent first connection block” lacks antecedent basis in the claim. Regarding claim 4, as it depends from claim 1, line 3; “the inner cavity of the second slide rail” lacks antecedent basis in the claim. Regarding claim 6, “second threaded rod” is indefinite as it is unclear if this is “the” introduced second threaded rod. Regarding claim 6, “the third connection block” lacks antecedent basis in the claim. Regarding claim 6, The term “close to” is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “close to” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Regarding claim 6, “the third suction cup” lacks antecedent basis in the claim. Regarding claims 7 & 8, “the foot assemble” lacks antecedent basis in the claim. Regarding claim 7, “the inner cavity of the foot” lacks antecedent basis in the claim. Regarding claim 9, “the block component” lacks antecedent basis in the claim and it is unclear if this is the clamping block component introduced in claim 7. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 1 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claims 2-10 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Stander (US 12,245,728) shows a splash plate for a bathtub; Trimmell (US Pub. 2025/0311894) shows a splash plate for a bathtub; Stander (US 12,207,769) shows a splash plate for a bathtub; Baker (US 5,701,615) shows a splash plate for a bathtub. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTINE J SKUBINNA whose telephone number is (571)270-5163. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Thursday, 9:30 AM to 6PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, DAVID ANGWIN can be reached at 571-270-3735. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTINE J SKUBINNA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3754 1/7/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 22, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599274
PORTABLE URINAL FOR USE WITH PATIENTS WITH LIMITED MOBILITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601164
TOILET DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594207
SANITARY BAG FOR MEDICAL USE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595671
SPA FRAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12584299
PLUMBING OR ABLUTIONARY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+20.6%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 977 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month