Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/780,938

COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR PRODUCING TOBACCO PLANTS AND PRODUCTS HAVING ALTERED ALKALOID LEVELS

Final Rejection §102§103§112
Filed
Jul 23, 2024
Priority
Jan 12, 2018 — provisional 62/616,959 +3 more
Examiner
KEOGH, MATTHEW R
Art Unit
1663
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Altria Client Services LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
563 granted / 717 resolved
+18.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
752
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.4%
-33.6% vs TC avg
§103
25.7%
-14.3% vs TC avg
§102
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
§112
42.2%
+2.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 717 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Status Claims 36 and 38-57 are pending and examined on the merits. Response to Arguments - Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 Applicant’s amendments filed 28 August 2026 have overcome the rejection of record. It is noted that the claims have been amended to require SEQ ID NO:153 instead of SEQ ID NO:13. Humphry et al teach SEQ ID NO:29 which is the same as instant SEQ ID NO:153. The claims are now rejected as obvious over Humphrey et al. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 36 and 38-57 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Humphry et al (WO2018237107). Humphry et al teach a Nicotiana tabacum plant comprising mutations in Nic1 genes including SEQ ID NO:29 which is identical to instant SEQ ID NO:153. They teach means by which the mutation may be engineered to reduce alkaloid content including nicotine (page 13, 54, 61, 66). They teach that mutations can be mutations that introduce a premature STOP codon (p. 30, 38-39). They further contemplate that the invention can be practiced in burley, flue-cured, Oriental, or Turkish tobaccos (p. 55, lines 8-13) and the resultant tobacco can be used to make both smokeless and smokable tobacco products (p. 76-77). Humphrey et al do not reduce to practice any specific mutant allele of SEQ ID NO:29 and thus report no data on the phenotypic impact of introducing a premature STOP codon in SEQ ID NO:29. At the time of filing it would have been prima facie obvious for a person of ordinary skill in the art to produce any mutant allele of SEQ ID NO:29 which impairs function of the gene such that alkaloid content including nicotine is reduced. One such class of mutant allele is an allele comprising a premature stop codon. Achieving the claimed alkaloid/nicotine levels and leaf quality appear to be phenotypes that may be routinely optimized through the use of different mutant alleles and different genetic backgrounds. Accordingly, claims 36 and 38-57 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being obvious over by Humphry et al. It is suggested that Applicant provide evidence and explanation as to why specific exemplified embodiments yielded unexpected results in context of the generic teachings of Humphrey et al and amend the claims to reflect the unexpected result. Although, please note that prosecution has been closed with this final rejection. BFY84121 (NOTE: this sequence has 17 duplicates in the database searched. See complete list at the end of this report) ID BFY84121 standard; DNA; 672 BP. XX AC BFY84121; XX DT 21-FEB-2019 (first entry) XX DE Tobacco Nitab4.5_0004620g0095.1 (ERF16) genomic DNA, SEQ 29. XX KW ERF16 gene; Nitab4.5_0004620g0095.1; alkaloid; cell culture; KW crop improvement; ds; gene; gene expression; plant; plant breeding; KW transgenic plant. XX OS Nicotiana tabacum. XX CC PN WO2018237107-A1. XX CC PD 27-DEC-2018. XX CC PF 21-JUN-2018; 2018WO-US038679. XX PR 23-JUN-2017; 2017US-0524216P. XX CC PA (KENT ) UNIV KENTUCKY RES FOUND. XX CC PI Humphry ME, Yang S, Qin Q; XX DR WPI; 2019-00091P/06. DR P-PSDB; BFY84124. XX CC PT Modulating alkaloid content of a plant, plant portion or cell culture CC PT used to breed plant for producing plant product and leaf, and growing CC PT crop, involves modifying plant or cell culture by modulating activity of CC PT NIC1 ERF gene. XX CC PS Claim 1; SEQ ID NO 29; 169pp; English. XX CC The present invention relates to a novel method for modulating the CC alkaloid content of a plant, plant portion or cell culture. The method CC involves: modifying the plant or cell culture by modulating the activity CC or expression of Nic1 ERF gene. The invention also provides: (1) a method CC for modulating the content of a tobacco specific nitrosamine (TSNA) or a CC precursor of TSNA in a tobacco plant or plant portion; (2) a method for CC producing a plant or plant portion, cell culture, plant propagation CC material, leaf, cut harvested leaf, processed leaf or cut and processed CC leaf which has modulated alkaloid content; (3) a tobacco blend comprises CC the cured tobacco material; (4) a tobacco industry product is prepared CC from a tobacco plant, or plant portion or a tobacco cell culture, and CC tobacco plant or portion propagated from tobacco plant propagation CC material, and harvested leaf of a plant, where the plant is tobacco, CC processed leaf; and (5) a mutant of a plant carrying a heritable mutation CC in a nucleotide sequence of Nic1 ERF gene. The method is useful to breed CC a plant for producing a plant product, and a leaf and a growing crop. The CC modulating the alkaloid content in plants: can increase the value of said CC plant as a biomass resource; can help to protect plants against insects CC and herbivores; and for producing tobacco plants and products with CC reduced nicotine may be desirable in view of the potential regulation of CC nicotine ceilings. The present sequence is a tobacco CC Nitab4.5_0004620g0095.1 (ERF16) genomic DNA, whose activity or expression CC is modulated in the method of the invention for modulating the alkaloid CC content of a plant, plant portion or cell culture. XX SQ Sequence 672 BP; 190 A; 150 C; 166 G; 166 T; 0 U; 0 Other; Query Match 100.0%; Score 672; Length 672; Best Local Similarity 100.0%; Matches 672; Conservative 0; Mismatches 0; Indels 0; Gaps 0; Qy 1 ATGAATTCAGCAGATGTAACCTTCTCTTTCTCTGATTTTAATCTCCTTGAATCCATTAAG 60 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Db 1 ATGAATTCAGCAGATGTAACCTTCTCTTTCTCTGATTTTAATCTCCTTGAATCCATTAAG 60 Qy 61 CAACATCTTTTAAATGATTCAGATTTTTCTGAAACTCTGTCGCCTATGAGTTCAAGTAAC 120 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Db 61 CAACATCTTTTAAATGATTCAGATTTTTCTGAAACTCTGTCGCCTATGAGTTCAAGTAAC 120 Qy 121 GGATTGCCTAACAGTCCTAGCTCAGGTTTTGGCAGCTCCCTTTCAGCAGAAAATAGCTTC 180 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Db 121 GGATTGCCTAACAGTCCTAGCTCAGGTTTTGGCAGCTCCCTTTCAGCAGAAAATAGCTTC 180 Qy 181 GAAATCTCCCTTTCGGACCAAAACTTTGAGGAAACAATACCAAATCTCGAAGAAAAGTCT 240 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Db 181 GAAATCTCCCTTTCGGACCAAAACTTTGAGGAAACAATACCAAATCTCGAAGAAAAGTCT 240 Qy 241 GAGTCCGAGGAGGAAATGAAGGGGAATGTGGTGGCGCGTGAGAATAACGCGCCGGAAGAT 300 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Db 241 GAGTCCGAGGAGGAAATGAAGGGGAATGTGGTGGCGCGTGAGAATAACGCGCCGGAAGAT 300 Qy 301 TGGAGGCGGTACATAGGAGTGAAACGGCGGCCATGGGGGACGTTTTCAGCGGAGATGAGA 360 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Db 301 TGGAGGCGGTACATAGGAGTGAAACGGCGGCCATGGGGGACGTTTTCAGCGGAGATGAGA 360 Qy 361 GACCCCGATAGGAGGGGGGCAAGACTGTGGTTAGGAACTTACGAGACCGCAGAGGATGCA 420 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Db 361 GACCCCGATAGGAGGGGGGCAAGACTGTGGTTAGGAACTTACGAGACCGCAGAGGATGCA 420 Qy 421 GCGTTGGCGTACGATCAAGCCGCTTTCAAAATCCGCGGCTCGAGAGCTCGGCTCAATTTT 480 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Db 421 GCGTTGGCGTACGATCAAGCCGCTTTCAAAATCCGCGGCTCGAGAGCTCGGCTCAATTTT 480 Qy 481 CCTCACTTAATCGGTTCAAACATGCCTAAGCCGGCTAGAGTTACAGCGAGGCGTAGTCGT 540 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Db 481 CCTCACTTAATCGGTTCAAACATGCCTAAGCCGGCTAGAGTTACAGCGAGGCGTAGTCGT 540 Qy 541 ACGCGCTCACCCGAGCCATTGTCTTCTTCGTCCACCTCATCATCAGTAAATGTACCAAGA 600 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Db 541 ACGCGCTCACCCGAGCCATTGTCTTCTTCGTCCACCTCATCATCAGTAAATGTACCAAGA 600 Qy 601 AAAAGGAAAATAGATGTGATCAATTCCATAGCCAAGGTTTGTCATGGTTGGAACCTCCAC 660 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Db 601 AAAAGGAAAATAGATGTGATCAATTCCATAGCCAAGGTTTGTCATGGTTGGAACCTCCAC 660 Qy 661 ATGTTACTATAA 672 |||||||||||| Db 661 ATGTTACTATAA 672 Response to Arguments - Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Applicant’s amendments filed 28 August 2026 have overcome the rejection of record, as the claims are now limited to Nicotiana tabacum. Conclusion No claims are allowed. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW R KEOGH whose telephone number is (571)272-2960. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 7-4:30, half day on Fridays. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amjad Abraham can be reached on 571-270-7058. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW R KEOGH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1663
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 23, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112
Aug 28, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 05, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12765497
SOYBEAN VARIETIES
2y 0m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12747445
METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR INCREASING HARVESTABLE YIELD VIA EDITING GA20 OXIDASE GENES TO GENERATE SHORT STATURE PLANTS
6y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12740530
INBRED CORN LINE KL20746C1
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12733605
INBRED CORN LINE KL20745C1
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735716
OPTIMAL MAIZE LOCI
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+14.4%)
2y 7m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 717 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month