Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/781,359

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING FALLS USING ROTATION-BASED SENSING

Final Rejection §101
Filed
Jul 23, 2024
Examiner
TRIEU, VAN THANH
Art Unit
2685
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Honeywell Safety Products Usa Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
921 granted / 1088 resolved
+22.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1112
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
65.2%
+25.2% vs TC avg
§102
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
§112
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1088 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 20 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to a judicial exception (i.e., a law of nature, a natural phenomenon, or an abstract idea) without significantly more. Claim 20 is directed to “one or more processors; and a memory storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors”. The claims do not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judiciary exception because the generally cited computer elements do not add a meaningful limitation to the abstract idea because they would be routine in any computer implementation. Please also note that much of the language following certain terms, such as “for remedying”, “for preventing”, “for implementing”, “to determine”, or “to perform”, would be interpreted as intended use. Additionally, the term “computer-readable medium” is normally preferred to be listed as a “non-transitory computer-readable medium”, so that it would clearly be identified as a tangible device or tangible computer or tangible processor. Furthermore, the Specification filed on 07/23/2024, page 32, paragraph [0098], disclosed “the process is embodied by a computer program code stored on a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium ...” Conclusion Claims 1, 2, 4-14 and 16-19 are allowed over the prior art. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. /VAN T TRIEU/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2685 03/13/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 23, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101
Feb 04, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 17, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12638910
HUMAN MACHINE INTERFACE DEVICE FOR COMMUNICATING TOUCH INTERACTION
2y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12638922
WEARABLE HAPTIC FEEDBACK DEVICE FOR HUMAN-ROBOT FORMATION CONTROL
1y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12627121
MARINA POWER PEDESTAL INCLUDING MARINA SAFETY STATUS INDICATION DEVICE
2y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12620313
PROCESSING METHOD, PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING PROCESSING PROGRAM
2y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12618182
APPARATUS INCLUDING ACTUATOR AND/OR HEATER AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING SAID APPARATUS
1y 6m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+13.5%)
2y 0m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1088 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month