Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/781,783

REST Client Scaling over HTTP/1.1

Non-Final OA §101§DP
Filed
Jul 23, 2024
Examiner
JACOBS-BURTON, LASHONDA T
Art Unit
2457
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Parallel Wireless Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allow Rate
900 granted / 987 resolved
+33.2% vs TC avg
Minimal -13% lift
Without
With
+-13.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
1004
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.3%
-29.7% vs TC avg
§103
27.0%
-13.0% vs TC avg
§102
30.7%
-9.3% vs TC avg
§112
12.7%
-27.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 987 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §DP
DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is in response to Applicants’ Application filed on July 23, 2024. Claims 1-14 are pending and presented for examination. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: the status of the Cross-Reference to Related Applications in paragraph 0001 needs to be updated. Appropriate correction is required. Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-14 of prior U.S. Patent No. 12/047431. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Application 18/781,783 1. A method, comprising: spawning a first Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) connection for a first received message from a first telecom node to a telecom server, sent using a Representational State Transfer (REST) interface over HTTP; opening a second HTTP connection for a second received message from a second telecom node, to ensure the second received message is not delayed due to delay in response from the telecom server in response to the first received message from the first telecom node to the telecom server; receiving a response for the first received message and refraining from closing the first HTTP connection for a predefined idle timeout period; delivering the response for the first received message to the first telecom node; and when a third message is received before expiration of the predefined idle timeout period, then using the first HTTP connection instead of opening a new connection. 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising if there is no idle connection available, then using a message send buffer to queue messages to be sent. 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising using a single process for the first and the second HTTP connection. 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising when there is no idle connection available, then tracking a plurality of messages using a response wait list and a message send buffer. 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the HTTP connection is using the HTTP 1.1 protocol. 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising using a response wait list with telecom node keys to enable blocking of messages between a given telecom node to the telecom server until a response is received from the telecom server to the given telecom node. 7. The method of claim 6, further comprising: marking each message with a specific key which depends on data present in the message, wherein generated data to be delivered in sequence is marked with a same key, and wherein messages having different keys are independent of each other and re delivered parallelly; spawning a connection when a message is received and sending that message over the connection, wherein all messages with different keys are scheduled parallelly on different connections until a maximum connection limit is reached; and storing incoming messages in a buffer once the maximum connection limit is reached. 8. A non-transitory computer-readable medium including instructions which, when executed on a telecom server, cause the telecom server to perform operations comprising: spawning a first Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) connection for a first received message from a first telecom node to a telecom server, sent using a Representational State Transfer (REST) interface over HTTP; opening a second HTTP connection for a second received message from a second telecom node, to ensure the second received message is not delayed due to delay in response from the telecom server in response to the first received message from the first telecom node to the telecom server; receiving a response for the first received message and refraining from closing the first HTTP connection for a predefined idle timeout period; delivering the response for the first received message to the first telecom node; and when a third message is received before expiration of the predefined idle timeout period, then using the first HTTP connection instead of opening a new connection. 9. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8, the instructions further comprising if there is no idle connection available, then using a message send buffer to queue messages to be sent. 10. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8, the instructions further comprising using a single process for the first and the second HTTP connection. 11. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8, the instructions further comprising when there is no idle connection available, then tracking a plurality of messages using a response wait list and a message send buffer. 12. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8, wherein the HTTP connection is using the HTTP 1.1 protocol. 13. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8, the instructions further comprising using a response wait list with telecom node keys to enable blocking of messages between a given telecom node to the telecom server until a response is received from the telecom server to the given telecom node. 14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13, the instructions further comprising: marking each message with a specific key which depends on data present in the message, wherein generated data to be delivered in sequence is marked with a same key, and wherein messages having different keys are independent of each other and re delivered parallelly; spawning a connection when a message is received and sending that message over the connection, wherein all messages with different keys are scheduled parallelly on different connections until a maximum connection limit is reached; and storing incoming messages in a buffer once the maximum connection limit is reached. U.S. Patent No. 12/047,431 1. A method, comprising: spawning a first Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) connection for a first received message from a first telecom node to a telecom server, sent using a Representational State Transfer (REST) interface over HTTP; opening a second HTTP connection for a second received message from a second telecom node, to ensure the second received message is not delayed due to delay in response from the telecom server in response to the first received message from the first telecom node to the telecom server; receiving a response for the first received message and refraining from closing the first HTTP connection for a predefined idle timeout period; delivering the response for the first received message to the first telecom node; and when a third message is received before expiration of the predefined idle timeout period, then using the first HTTP connection instead of opening a new connection. 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising if there is no idle connection available, then using a message send buffer to queue messages to be sent. 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising using a single process for the first and the second HTTP connection. 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising when there is no idle connection available, then tracking a plurality of messages using a response wait list and a message send buffer. 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the HTTP connection is using the HTTP 1.1 protocol. 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising using a response wait list with telecom node keys to enable blocking of messages between a given telecom node to the telecom server until a response is received from the telecom server to the given telecom node. 7. The method of claim 6, further comprising: marking each message with a specific key which depends on data present in the message, wherein generated data to be delivered in sequence is marked with a same key, and wherein messages having different keys are independent of each other and re delivered parallelly; spawning a connection when a message is received and sending that message over the connection, wherein all messages with different keys are scheduled parallelly on different connections until a maximum connection limit is reached; and storing incoming messages in a buffer once the maximum connection limit is reached. 8. A non-transitory computer-readable medium including instructions which, when executed on a telecom server, cause the telecom server to perform operations comprising: spawning a first Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) connection for a first received message from a first telecom node to a telecom server, sent using a Representational State Transfer (REST) interface over HTTP; opening a second HTTP connection for a second received message from a second telecom node, to ensure the second received message is not delayed due to delay in response from the telecom server in response to the first received message from the first telecom node to the telecom server; receiving a response for the first received message and refraining from closing the first HTTP connection for a predefined idle timeout period; delivering the response for the first received message to the first telecom node; and when a third message is received before expiration of the predefined idle timeout period, then using the first HTTP connection instead of opening a new connection. 9. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8, the instructions further comprising if there is no idle connection available, then using a message send buffer to queue messages to be sent. 10. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8, the instructions further comprising using a single process for the first and the second HTTP connection. 11. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8, the instructions further comprising when there is no idle connection available, then tracking a plurality of messages using a response wait list and a message send buffer. 12. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8, wherein the HTTP connection is using the HTTP 1.1 protocol. 13. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8, the instructions further comprising using a response wait list with telecom node keys to enable blocking of messages between a given telecom node to the telecom server until a response is received from the telecom server to the given telecom node. 14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13, the instructions further comprising: marking each message with a specific key which depends on data present in the message, wherein generated data to be delivered in sequence is marked with a same key, and wherein messages having different keys are independent of each other and re delivered parallelly; spawning a connection when a message is received and sending that message over the connection, wherein all messages with different keys are scheduled parallelly on different connections until a maximum connection limit is reached; and storing incoming messages in a buffer once the maximum connection limit is reached. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LASHONDA T JACOBS-BURTON whose telephone number is (571)272-4004. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30 am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ario Etienne can be reached at 571-272-4001. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LASHONDA JACOBS-BURTON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2457 ljb September 22, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 23, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602463
COMMUNICATION SERVICE ADAPTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598165
STATELESS WEB ELEMENTS THAT DECODE OR DECRYPT DATA
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585767
DETECTING ZERO-DAY MALWARE WITH TETRA CODE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580908
System and Method for Authenticating and Authorizing Cloud Accounts to Access On-Premises Services
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574249
OFF-CHAIN DOMAIN NAME RECORD RESOLUTION BASED ON BLOCKCHAIN ASSETS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (-13.0%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 987 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month