Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/782,133

END NUT ASSEMBLY WITH EXTENDED SPACER

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Jul 24, 2024
Priority
Jul 21, 2022 — CIP of 12/313,109
Examiner
BYRD, EUGENE G
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Applied System Technologies Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
593 granted / 850 resolved
+9.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
877
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
90.5%
+50.5% vs TC avg
§102
7.0%
-33.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 850 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1, 3-5, 7, 12 and 14 of U.S. Patent No. 12,313,109. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claims are essentially identical such as where an end nut assembly, comprises a nut body defining a first portion and a second portion, a first opening is adjacent the first portion and a second opening is adjacent the second portion, an axial bore extends between the first opening and the second opening. The nut body comprises internal threads that are structured to receive external threads of a coupling. A bite ring defining an outer ring and a plurality of teeth extending radially inwardly from the outer ring and a spacer defining an inner surface, containing two tapered sections on opposed sides of the inner surface, and an outer surface, wherein the inner surface defines a cavity centrally located within the spacer, wherein a bottom surface of the spacer is structured to exclusively contact an upper surface of the coupling, wherein the upper surface of the coupling defines a rigid surface and the spacer is positioned within the axial bore and contains a circular cross-section and at least one finger disposed on the outer surface for engaging the nut body. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Relevant references such as Park (KR 200800110060 disclose a pipe connector, and more particularly, when tightening the screw of the tightening nut, while the release prevention ring, the auxiliary ring, the packing member is pressed to the connecting socket side by the pressing portion, the packing member of the corrugated pipe of the bone or metal pipe at the same time, the support piece of the release prevention ring is caught by the corrugated bone or the support of the outer circumferential surface of the metal tube to prevent the tube from being separated, thereby improving the airtight/watertight performance and preventing leakage. The present invention relates to a pipe connector which can be used for both corrugated pipe or metal pipe connection only by replacing the release preventing ring, and preventing damage and flow, and assembling the pipe quickly and safely. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EUGENE G BYRD whose telephone number is (571)270-1824. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kristina Fulton can be reached at 5712727376. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EUGENE G BYRD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3675
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 24, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12663101
DEVICE FOR ROUTING LINES, PIPES, AND/OR CABLES THROUGH A BUILDING STRUCTURE PART
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12663082
SEALING DEVICE, APPARATUS AND ROBOT HAVING THE SAME
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12655907
SEALING ARRANGEMENT WITH GROUNDING ELEMENT
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12650171
SYSTEMS, ASSEMBLIES, APPARATUSES, AND METHODS PROVIDING ENHANCED FLUID SEAL FOR HIGH-POWER PUMPS
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12649848
SEALING APPARATUS
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+9.6%)
2y 9m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 850 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month