Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/782,235

Lyophilization Container Fixture

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jul 24, 2024
Examiner
GRAVINI, STEPHEN MICHAEL
Art Unit
3753
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Terumo Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
1278 granted / 1640 resolved
+7.9% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1659
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
35.6%
-4.4% vs TC avg
§102
29.5%
-10.5% vs TC avg
§112
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1640 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 13-14 are objected to because claim 13 ends in a semi-colon instead of a period. Claims should be a single sentence and end in a period. Since claim 14 depends upon claim 13, that claim is objected based on dependency. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2, 10, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 2 is construed to be indefinite because the recitation “the corresponding” lacks a positive antecedent basis. Claim 10 is construed to be indefinite because the recitation “the second member” lacks a positive antecedent basis. Claim 13 is construed to be indefinite because the recitation “the alignment” (plural occurrences) lacks a positive antecedent basis. Since claim 19 depends upon an indefinite claim, that claim is construed to be indefinite by dependency. Claim 15 is construed to be indefinite because the recitation “the corresponding” lacks a positive antecedent basis. Since claims 16-18 depend upon an indefinite claim, those claims are construed to be indefinite by dependency. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-13 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Anger (US 5,822,882). The claims are reasonably and broadly construed, in light of the accompanying specification, to be disclosed by Anger as teaching: a lyophilization fixture (see title and abstract) comprising: a base member 18; and a lid member 22 movable between a first position and a second position relative to the base member, the base member and lid member together defining a housing that receives at least a portion of a lyophilization container 40, 12 (shown in figures 4A, 6, 7, and disclosed at column 6 line 26 through column 7 line 36). Anger also discloses the claim 2 feature wherein the lid member includes two or more lid coupling members, and the base member includes two or more base coupling members, each of the two or more base coupling members including slots configured to receive at least a portion of the corresponding lid coupling member (figures 7, 8, 9), the claim 3 feature wherein the two or more lid coupling members includes a first pair of lid coupling members and a second pair of lid coupling members, the first pair of lid coupling members is disposed on a first side of the lid, and the second pair of lid coupling members is disposed on a second side of the lid (figures 9, 10A), the claim 4 feature wherein the two or more base coupling members includes a first pair of base coupling members and a second pair of base coupling members, the first pair of base coupling members is disposed on a first side of the base member and configured to receive at least a portion of the first pair of lid coupling members, and the second pair of lid coupling members is disposed on a second side of the base member and configured to receive at least a portion of the second pair of lid coupling members (figures 10B, 11), the claim 5 feature wherein the first pair of base coupling members and the first pair of lid coupling members define a hinge allowing for movement of the lid member between the first position and the second position (figures 9, 10A), the claim 6 feature wherein the hinge is a first hinge, and the second pair of base coupling members and the second pair of lid coupling members define a second hinge allowing for movement of the lid member between the first position and a third position (figures 10A, 11), the claim 7 feature wherein the base member and the lid member together define a first portion of the lyophilization fixture, the portion of the lyophilization container is a first portion of the lyophilization container, and the lyophilization fixture further includes: a second portion including a frame member configured to support a second portion of the lyophilization container (figures 9, 11), the claim 8 feature wherein the frame member includes: a first section having a first major plane, and a second section having a second major plane that is separated from the first major plane (figures 8, 9), the claim 9 features wherein the frame member further includes: a third section that joins together the first section and the second section (figures 10A, 11), the claim 10 feature wherein the second member is continuous with the base member of the first portion (figures 7, 8), the claim 11 feature wherein the second portion further includes one or more couplers for engaging the lyophilization container (figures 6, 7), the claim 12 feature wherein the two or more couplers are disposed at a distal portion of the second portion away from the first portion (figures 4B, 6), the claim 13 feature, wherein the lyophilization container includes a first section to be received by the first portion of the lyophilization fixture, the first section including a first layer, a second layer aligned with the first layer, and a cavity defined by the alignment of the first and second layers, at least one of the first and second layers preformed to have a three-dimensional shape; and a second section to be received by the second portion of the lyophilization fixture, the second section including a third layer, a fourth layer aligned with the third layer, and a second cavity defined by the alignment of the third and fourth layers, at least one of the third and fourth layers including a breathable membrane (figures 9, 11), the claim 19 feature wherein the frame member further includes: a third section that joins together the first section and the second section (figures 9, 11). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 14-18 and 20 are allowable over the prior art of record because the lyophilization fixture and method of using thereof with all the independently claim features including breathable and/or non-breathable lyophilization features is not found in the prior art either singly or in combination. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Other prior art references cited with this action may teach one or more claim features, but do not rise to a level of anticipation, obviousness, and/or double patenting such that a rejection would be proper and reasonable under current Office practice and procedure. References A, B, C, D, N, cited with this action, are patent publications from the same inventive entity, as the current application. References E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, cited with this action, teach lyophilization fixtures and methods of using thereof. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEPHEN MICHAEL GRAVINI whose telephone number is (571)272-4875. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 5:30 am to 5:00 (mid day flex) first F 6:00 am t0 11:00 am. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Craig Schneider can be reached at 571 272 3607. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Wednesday, September 9, 2026 /STEPHEN M GRAVINI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3753
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 24, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Sep 30, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747915
DRYING APPARATUS AND SYSTEM FOR PREPARING BATTERIES
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12736285
FREEZE DRYING INSTALLATION
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729157
DEVICE FOR SMELTING AND REGENERATING PHOSPHOGYPSUM USING HIGH-TEMPERATURE CERAMSITE AND METHOD FOR USING SAME
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727737
SHOE CARE DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729913
Drying Device with Automatically Adjustable Shield Film
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+19.2%)
2y 6m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1640 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month