Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/782,559

REFRIGERATOR

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 24, 2024
Priority
Aug 24, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0111578 +2 more
Examiner
TRAN, HANH VAN
Art Unit
3637
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
930 granted / 1256 resolved
+22.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1285
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
47.2%
+7.2% vs TC avg
§102
26.8%
-13.2% vs TC avg
§112
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1256 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 7/14/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 4-6, and 9-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by US 2025/0052482 to Jeong et al (hereinafter Jeong). The applied reference has a common assignee with the instant application. Based upon the earlier effectively filed date of the reference, it constitutes prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2). This rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) might be overcome by: (1) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(a) that the subject matter disclosed in the reference was obtained directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor of this application and is thus not prior art in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(A); (2) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(b) of a prior public disclosure under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(B) if the same invention is not being claimed; or (3) a statement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) establishing that, not later than the effective filing date of the claimed invention, the subject matter disclosed in the reference and the claimed invention were either owned by the same person or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same person or subject to a joint research agreement. Jeong discloses (Claim 1). A refrigerator 1 comprising: a main body 2 formed by an assembly of a plurality of insulation panels 20; a storage space 3 in the main body 2; a door 4 to open and close the storage space 3; and a cooling device 5 to supply cold air to the storage space, wherein the plurality of insulation panels 20 includes a first insulation panel 40 and a second insulation panel 60 coupled to the first insulation panel 40, the first insulation panel 40 includes: an inner case 44, an outer case 45 coupled to the inner case 44 to thereby form an insulating space between the inner case 44 and the outer case 45, and an insulation 46 in the insulating space, the inner case 44 includes: a space forming portion 44B defining one side of the storage space, a coupling portion 42,47T formed continuously with the space forming portion and coupled to the second insulation panel 60, and a contact portion offset from the space forming portion and contacting an outer surface of the second insulation panel (such as shown in Fig. 19), and the contact portion includes at least one opening 49 offset from the coupling portion 42,47T to reduce heat transfer through the contact portion between the first insulation panel and the second insulation panel; (Claim 2). The refrigerator of claim 1, wherein the contact portion includes a horizontal contact portion (horizontal portion 44B) extending from the space forming portion 44B in a horizontal direction, and a vertical contact portion 44A extending from the horizontal contact portion in a vertical direction; (Claim 4). The refrigerator of claim 1, wherein the inner case 44 includes a resin material; (Claim 5). The refrigerator of claim 1, wherein the insulation 46 includes urethane foam; (Claim 6). The refrigerator of claim 1, wherein the inner case 44 is a molded member, and the at least one opening is formed integrally with the inner case 44; (Claim 9). The refrigerator of claim 1, wherein the coupling portion includes a coupling protrusion 42 that is inserted into the second insulation panel 60; (Claim 10). The refrigerator of claim 9, wherein the coupling protrusion protrudes to be coplanar with the space forming portion 44B; (Claim 11). The refrigerator of claim 9, wherein the coupling portion includes a hook coupling portion 42 on the coupling protrusion to be hook-coupled to the second insulation panel 40 (Figs. 13-20); (Claim 12). The refrigerator of claim 1, wherein the inner case 44 includes a reinforcing rib 49A protruding from an edge of the at least one opening of the contact portion to increase a rigidity of the first insulation panel. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3-5, 7, 9, 10-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by USP 8117792 to Kim et al (hereinafter Kim). Kim discloses (Claim 1). A refrigerator 200 comprising (Fig. 6): a main body formed by an assembly of a plurality of insulation panels 210,220; a storage space in the main body; a door (inherent) to open and close the storage space; and a cooling device (inherent) to supply cold air to the storage space, wherein the plurality of insulation panels 210,220 includes a first insulation panel 220 and a second insulation panel 210 coupled to the first insulation panel 220, the first insulation panel 220 includes: an inner case 223,228a, an outer case 222 coupled to the inner case to thereby form an insulating space between the inner case and the outer case, and an insulation 221 in the insulating space, the inner case includes: a space forming portion 223 defining one side of the storage space, a coupling portion 228a formed continuously with the space forming portion 223 and coupled to the second insulation panel 210; and a contact portion (see below annotated Fig. 6) offset from the space forming portion 223 and contacting an outer surface of the second insulation panel 210, and the contact portion includes at least one opening (see below annotated Fig. 6) offset from the coupling portion 228a to reduce heat transfer through the contact portion between the first insulation panel 220 and the second insulation panel 210; PNG media_image1.png 954 1114 media_image1.png Greyscale (Claim 3). The refrigerator of claim 1, wherein the insulation 221 of the first insulation panel 220 is exposed through the at least one opening; (Claim 4). The refrigerator of claim 1, wherein the inner case 223 includes a resin material (col. 3, lines 33-42); (Claim 5). The refrigerator of claim 1, wherein the insulation 221 includes urethane foam (col. 5, lines 3-4); (Claim 7). The refrigerator of claim 1, wherein the at least one opening is a cutout portion of the inner case; (Claim 9). The refrigerator of claim 1, wherein the coupling portion includes a coupling protrusion that is inserted into the second insulation panel 210; (Claim 11). The refrigerator of claim 9, wherein the coupling portion includes (see below attached marked-up copy) a hook coupling portion on the coupling protrusion to be hook-coupled to the second insulation panel 210; PNG media_image2.png 726 1088 media_image2.png Greyscale (Claim 12). The refrigerator of claim 1, wherein the inner case includes (see below annotated Fig. 6) a reinforcing rib protruding from an edge of the at least one opening of the contact portion to increase a rigidity of the first insulation panel; PNG media_image3.png 646 810 media_image3.png Greyscale (Claim 13). The refrigerator of claim 12, wherein the contact portion includes a contact surface on a first side to contact the second insulation panel 210, and an opposing surface on a second side opposite the first side, and the reinforcing rib protrudes from the opposing surface. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 6 and 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim in view of US 2022/0099358 to Jung et al (hereinafter Jung). Kim discloses all the elements as discussed above including the limitations in claim 6 of the at least one opening is formed integrally with the inner case, claim 14 of a first vertical reinforcement portion protruding from a first side edge of the at least one opening, and a second vertical reinforcement portion protruding from a second side edge of the at least one opening. The differences being that Kim fails to clearly disclose the limitations in (i) claim 6 of wherein the inner case is a molded member; and (ii) claim 14 of wherein the at least one opening has a quadrangular shape, and the reinforcing rib includes: a first horizontal reinforcement portion protruding from an upper edge of the at least one opening, a second horizontal reinforcement portion protruding from a lower edge of the at least one opening. Regarding (i), Jung shows in paragraph [0004] that it is known to manufacture the main body of a refrigerator by molding inner and outer cases. Therefore, it would have been obvious and well within the level of one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, in view of Jung, to modify Kim to include the limitations in (i) Claim 6 of wherein the inner case is a molded member with a reasonable expectation of success in order to increase the overall versatility of the refrigerator. Regarding (ii), the at least one opening 218 of Kim (Fig. 6) appears to have a quadrangular shape, and since Kim also discloses a first vertical reinforcement portion protruding from a first side edge of the at least one opening, and a second vertical reinforcement portion protruding from a second side edge of the at least one opening, it would have been obvious and well within the level of one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Kim to include the limitations in (ii) Claim 14 of wherein the at least one opening has a quadrangular shape, and the reinforcing rib includes: a first horizontal reinforcement portion protruding from an upper edge of the at least one opening, a second horizontal reinforcement portion protruding from a lower edge of the at least one opening with a reasonable expectation of success in order to increase the overall versatility and strength of the refrigerator. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2 and 10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 7/14/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In response to applicant’s arguments on pages 6-7 that the prior art of record fails to teach or fairly suggest the limitations in claim 1 of an “inner case includes: a space forming portion defining one side of the storage space, a coupling portion formed continuously with the space forming portion and coupled to the second insulation panel, and a contact portion offset from the space forming portion and contacting an outer surface of the second insulation panel, and the contact portion includes at least one opening offset from the coupling portion to reduce heat transfer through the contact portion between the first insulation panel and the second insulation panel”, the examiner respectfully take the position that, as stated in the above rejection to claim 1, Kim clearly discloses inner case includes: a space forming portion 223 defining one side of the storage space, a coupling portion 228a formed continuously with the space forming portion 223 and coupled to the second insulation panel 210; and a contact portion (see below annotated Fig. 6) offset from the space forming portion 223 and contacting an outer surface of the second insulation panel 210, and the contact portion includes at least one opening (see below annotated Fig. 6) offset from the coupling portion 228a to reduce heat transfer through the contact portion between the first insulation panel 220 and the second insulation panel 210. PNG media_image4.png 595 969 media_image4.png Greyscale Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HANH VAN TRAN whose telephone number is (571)272-6868. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, DANIEL TROY can be reached at (571)270-3742. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. HVT August 21, 2026 /HANH V TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3637
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 24, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 15, 2026
Response Filed
May 28, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jul 14, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12727671
Modular Shelving System and Method for Using the Same
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729905
VACUUM PORT PRESSURE SENSOR COVER
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727666
CABLE MANAGEMENT APPARATUS AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12722095
MODULAR DISPLAY SYSTEM
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12716280
TOUCH LATCH DRAWER ASSEMBLIES WITH UNINTENTIONAL ANTI-UNLATCHING CAPABILITY
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+14.1%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1256 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month