Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/783,008

INK COMPOSITION FOR INKJET PRINTING

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 24, 2024
Priority
Aug 02, 2023 — GB 2311847.4
Examiner
AMEH, YAOVI M
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Domino UK Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
847 granted / 928 resolved
+23.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
953
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
88.1%
+48.1% vs TC avg
§102
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
§112
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 928 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 13 and 16 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to nonelected inventions, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 03/18/2026. Information Disclosure Statement 3. Acknowledgment is made of Applicant’s Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) form PTO-1449. These IDS have been considered. Priority 4. Receipt is acknowledged of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Drawings 5. The examiner contends that the drawings submitted on 07/24/2024 are acceptable for examination proceedings. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 6. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. 7. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 8. Claims 1-12, 14-15 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a) (1) as being anticipated by Kozee et al. (US Pub. Nº 2015/0166806). 9. Regarding independent claim 1: Kozee et al. disclosed an inkjet ink ([0021], line 1) composition comprising: a cellulosic polymer ([0027], lines 5-8) for forming a porous network structure (this constitutes an intended use and would not be given patentable weight); a blend ([0026], lines 1-3) of a nonsolvent for the cellulosic polymer ([0027], lines 4-5; the cellulosic polymer is insoluble in water) and a solvent for the cellulosic polymer ([0027], lines 4-5. The cellulosic polymer is soluble in the entire ink composition; also see [0026], lines 1-3; the cellulosic polymer is therefore soluble in the mixture of acetone and ethanol); the solvent being more volatile than the nonsolvent ([0026], lines 1-3; both acetone and ethanol are more volatile than water); and a film forming binder that is substantially insoluble in acetone alone ([0027], lines 1-2 and 5-8; the polymer is insoluble in water and therefore is insoluble in acetone alone since acetone is soluble in water), the film forming binder being separately soluble in both the nonsolvent and the blend ([0027], lines 4-5; the polymer is soluble in the entire ink composition which includes the water, the acetone and the ethanol). 10. Regarding claim 2: Kozee et al. disclosed a composition according to claim 1 wherein the nonsolvent comprises water ([0027], lines 4-5). 11. Regarding claim 3: Kozee et al. disclosed a composition according to claim 2 wherein the cellulosic polymer comprises one or more of: a cellulose ester and a cellulose ether ([0027], lines 1-2 and 5-8). 12. Regarding claim 4: Kozee et al. disclosed a composition according to claim 3 wherein the cellulosic polymer comprises one or more of: cellulose acetate propionate and cellulose acetate butyrate ([0027], lines 5-8). 13. Regarding claim 5: Kozee et al. disclosed a composition according to claim 1 wherein the solvent comprises one or more of: acetone, methanol, ethanol and propanol ([0026], lines 1-3). 14. Regarding claim 6: Kozee et al. disclosed a composition according to claim 5 wherein the solvent comprises acetone and ethanol ([0026], lines 1-3). 15. Regarding claim 7: Kozee et al. disclosed a composition according to claim 1 wherein the film forming binder comprises an ionic polymer and corresponding non-polymeric counter-ion ([0027], lines 5-8, [0028], lines 1-5 and [0033], lines 2-8). 16. Regarding claim 8: Kozee et al. disclosed a composition according to claim 1 wherein the film forming binder comprises a carboxylic acid functional acrylic neutralized by a volatile amine and/or ammonia ([0033], lines 2-8). 17. Regarding claim 9: Kozee et al. disclosed a composition according to claim 1 in which the film forming binder comprises polyvinyl pyrrolidone ([0027], lines 1-2 and 5-8; more than one resin can be used). 18. Regarding claim 10: Kozee et al. disclosed a composition according to claim 1 wherein the nonsolvent is present at greater than ten weight percent ([0010], line 1 and [0026], lines 2-5. The total amount of solvent can be up to 95%, the preferred amount of acetone is between 50% and 80% and the preferred amount of ethanol is between 5% and 35%. This yields a total amount of water of up to 40% (when the total amount of solvent is 95%, the amount of acetone is 50% and the amount of ethanol is 5%)). 19. Regarding claim 11: Kozee et al. disclosed a composition according to claim 2, wherein the water and film forming binder are present in sufficient quantity to provide the composition with a conductivity of at least 400 micro-siemens per centimetre ([0028], lines 1-4) irrespective of the presence of an additional conductivity agent ([0021], line 2; the ink composition may (or may not) include a conductive salt). 20. Regarding claim 12: Kozee et al. disclosed a printer ink cartridge holding the inkjet ink composition of claim 1 ([0015], line 2; the ink composition is for use in an inkjet printer (cartridge not shown)). 21. Regarding claim 14: Kozee et al. disclosed a printing method comprising the steps of providing a composition according to claim 1 (see the rejection of claim 1), and depositing the ink composition onto a substrate ([0015], lines 1-2), and optionally permitting the deposited composition to dry ([0025], line 12). 22. Regarding claim 15: Kozee et al. disclosed an article marked with a printed deposit using the method of claim 14 ([0015], lines 1-2). 23. Regarding claim 17: Kozee et al. disclosed a composition according to claim 7, wherein the water and film forming binder are present in sufficient quantity to provide the composition with a conductivity of at least 400 micro-siemens per centimetre ([0028], lines 1-4) irrespective of the presence of an additional conductivity agent ([0021], line 2; the ink composition may (or may not) include a conductive salt). Conclusion 24. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. 25. U.S. Patent publication number 4,389,503 to Maxwell et al. disclosed a similar invention in the abstract. 26. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YAOVI M. AMEH whose telephone number is (571)272-4578. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9:00 AM - 6:00 PM. 27. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. 28. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, RICARDO MAGALLANES can be reached at (571)272-5960. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. 29. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /YAOVI M AMEH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 24, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679119
DRUM CONVEYANCE MECHANISM AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673498
INKJET RECORDING APPARATUS
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668065
LIQUID EJECTING DEVICE AND LIQUID RESERVOIR TO INCREASE VOLUME RATIO OF STORED LIQUID
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668068
DATA PROCESSING APPARATUS, DATA PROCESSING METHOD, PRINTING APPARATUS, PRINTING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668058
JETTING HEAD CONTROL DEVICE, JETTING HEAD CONTROL METHOD, PROGRAM, AND LIQUID JET SYSTEM
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+8.2%)
1y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 928 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month