Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/783,690

COMPACT RELIABLE RECEPTACLE CONNECTOR

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 25, 2024
Priority
Jul 26, 2023 — CN 202321988693.0
Examiner
LEE, SEUNG H
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Amphenol East Asia Electronic Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
1064 granted / 1215 resolved
+27.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1226
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
§103
34.9%
-5.1% vs TC avg
§102
34.9%
-5.1% vs TC avg
§112
13.4%
-26.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1215 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6, 11, 17-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yao et al. (US 2017/0054246). Re claim 1: Yao teaches a receptacle connector (100) comprising a housing (5); a shell (4) surrounding a cavity and at least partially embedded in the housing, the shell comprising a mating end extending beyond the housing in a mating direction; and a terminal assembly (1) disposed in the shell, the terminal assembly comprising a plurality of conductive elements (23), the plurality of conductive elements comprising mating ends disposed in the cavity, and tail ends extending out of the shell (see figs. 1-5; paragraphs 0016-0022). Re claim 2: Wherein: the terminal assembly (1) comprises an assembly housing (11) holding the plurality of conductive elements (23); the assembly housing (11) comprises one or more grooves (fig. 4); and a rear of the shell (4) comprises one or more portions each protruding into a respective groove of the one or more grooves of the assembly housing (figs. 2 and 3). Re claim 3: The receptacle connector comprising a board lock (54) partially embedded in the housing (5) and comprising one or more mounting portions extending beyond the housing in a mounting direction different from the mating direction (fig. 3). Re claim 4: Wherein: the mounting direction is perpendicular to the mating direction (fig. 3). Re claim 5: Wherein: the shell (4) comprises a sidewall and a connecting portion; and the connecting portion comprises a first end connected to a rear of the sidewall and a second end connected to the board lock such that the board lock extends next to the sidewall (fig. 1). Re claim 6: Wherein: the board lock comprises a beam (54) elongated in the mating direction and embedded in the housing; and the one or more mounting portions extend from the beam in the mounting direction (fig. 3). Re claim 11: Yao teaches a receptacle connector (100) comprising a terminal assembly (1) comprising an assembly housing (11) and a plurality of conductive elements (23) held by the assembly housing, each of the plurality of conductive elements comprising a mating end, a tail end extending out of the assembly housing, and an intermediate portion between the mating end and the tail end; a shell (4) surrounding at least the mating ends and intermediate portions of the plurality of conductive elements and engaging at least a portion of the assembly housing; and a housing (5) disposed outside the shell and molded over a rear of the shell (see figs. 1-5; paragraphs 0016-0022). Re claim 17: Yao teaches a method of manufacturing a receptacle connector, the method comprising providing a shell (4) surrounding a cavity and comprising one or more portions protruding into the cavity (fig. 3); providing a terminal assembly (1) comprising an assembly housing (11) and a plurality of conductive elements (23) held by the assembly housing; inserting the terminal assembly into the cavity of the shell; and molding a housing over portions of the shell (claim 5) (see figs. 1-5; paragraphs 0016-0022). Re claim 18: Wherein: molding the housing over portions of the shell (4) comprises molding the housing over portions of a board lock (54) (fig. 3). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 7, 12, and 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yao in view of Zhao (US 2017/0352990, cited by the applicant). The teachings of Yao have been discussed above. Although, Yao teaches the receptacle connector comprising the housing, the shell, and the terminal assembly, he fails to particularly teach that the receptacle connector comprising a sealing member. Zhao teaches the connector assembly (200) comprising a sealing member (204) (see fig. 5; paragraphs 0026, 0029). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention was made to incorporate the teachings of Zhao to the teachings of Yao in order to seal the gap between the components of the receptacle connector. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8-10, 13-16, and 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: None of prior art teaches that the mating end of the shell comprises a rough portion that has a surface roughness higher than a rest of the mating end of the shell; and the sealing member is disposed on the rough portion of the mating end of the shell, the bottom wall of the rear of the shell comprises one or more portions protruding toward the terminal assembly; and the sealing member comprises a side conforming to a surface of the bottom wall of the rear of the shell and other sides conforming to inner surfaces of the housing, and subsequent to molding the housing, severing a lead frame from the shell and the board lock as set forth in the claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Hou et al. (US 2023/0104592) teaches electrical connector. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SEUNG H LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-2401. The examiner can normally be reached 7-4:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven Paik can be reached at 571-272-2404. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SEUNG H LEE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2876
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 25, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Aug 26, 2026
Interview Requested
Sep 08, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 08, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749821
REDUCING AZIMUTH-ELEVATION CORRELATION IN AN ANTENNA ARRAY STRUCTURE
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749831
COMMUNICATION APPARATUS AND BASE STATION ANTENNA FEEDER SYSTEM
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744344
ELECTRICAL PLUG CONNECTOR WITH RADIALLY ACTUATED SECONDARY LOCKING, AND ELECTRICAL PLUG-IN CONNECTION SYSTEM
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744306
BASE STATION ANTENNA
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738630
PAINTING ANTENNA AND ANTENNA-INTEGRATED ARTICLE
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+10.8%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1215 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month