Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/783,793

Transceiver With Auxiliary Receiver Calibration Apparatus and Methodology

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jul 25, 2024
Priority
May 06, 2019 — continuation of 11/070,242 +2 more
Examiner
HUANG, DAVID S
Art Unit
2631
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Texas Instruments Incorporated
OA Round
2 (Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
612 granted / 705 resolved
+24.8% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
722
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
50.8%
+10.8% vs TC avg
§102
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
§112
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 705 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 1/27/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that the amendments to the claims correct the §112(a) rejections of 8/27/2025. However, the currently amended claims also do not fully comply with the written description requirement of §112(a) as they recite subject matter not adequately disclosed by the specification, particularly with respect to the limitations directed to the “first switch” and the “second switch.” See the §112(a) rejection below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 1 recites “a first switch coupled to the second terminal of the first capacitor” on lines 12-13 and “a second switch coupled to the second terminal of the first capacitor” on lines 19-20. However, there are not two switches that are both connected to the “second terminal of the first capacitor” which appear to refer to either capacitor 1110 or 1118 of Fig. 1B. Therefore, the subject matter of claim 1 is considered to be new matter that is not supported by the original specification. However, this appears to be a drafting error, and can be corrected by changing lines 19-20 to read as “a second switch coupled to the second terminal of the third capacitor” to refer to either switch 1114 or 1122, and the “first switch” on lines 12-13 would refer to the other of switch 1114 or 1122. Claims 2-20 are dependent on claim 1 and are similarly rejected. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 is rejected in view of the §112(a) rejection above, as it is unclear whether the first and second switches in claim 1 are intended to refer to switches 1114 and 1122, respectively, or to some other feature. Claim 1 is unclear and indefinite. Claims 2-20 are dependent on claim 1 and are similarly rejected. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID S HUANG whose telephone number is (571)270-1798. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hannah Wang can be reached at (571) 272-9018. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /David S Huang/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2631 6/26/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 25, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jan 27, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676644
EDGE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM WITH CASCADED REPEATER DEVICES OVER WIRED MEDIUM
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671370
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION APPARATUS AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12650502
ELECTRONIC CIRCUIT FOR DETECTING AN ULTRA-WIDEBAND PULSE
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12652198
ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR FEEDING BACK CHANNEL STATE INFORMATION BY USING AUTOENCODER BASED ON MODIFIED SPLIT LEARNING, AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12647158
SIGNAL TRANSMISSION METHOD AND DEVICE, TERMINAL AND ACCESS NETWORK DEVICE
2y 12m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.3%)
2y 5m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 705 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month