Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/783,873

BREAST PROSTHESES, METHODS OF MANUFACTURING BREAST PROSTHESES, AND METHODS OF TREATMENT USING BREAST PROSTHESES

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Jul 25, 2024
Priority
Jan 13, 2012 — provisional 61/586,391 +6 more
Examiner
GHERBI, SUZETTE JAIME J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
LifeCell Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
1173 granted / 1380 resolved
+25.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
1410
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
49.4%
+9.4% vs TC avg
§102
13.3%
-26.7% vs TC avg
§112
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1380 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. 3. Claim 1 is rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 9,549,812 ('812). Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other. For example application claim 1 recites: "An implantable prosthesis prepared by a method comprising: preparing a shell of a breast implant or tissue expander; providing one or more samples of graft material sized and shaped to conform to a portion of a surface of the breast implant or tissue expander; attaching the graft material to the shell of the breast implant or tissue expander prior to curing the shell of the breast implant or tissue expander; curing the shell of the breast implant or tissue expander and the graft material; and removing the graft material from the breast implant or tissue expander after the curing step." Patent claim 13 and 19 of '812 recites: "13. A method of making an implantable prosthesis comprising preparing a shell of a silicone breast implant or tissue expander; providing one or more samples of graft material sized and shaped to conform to a portion of a surface of the breast implant or tissue expander; attaching the graft material to the shell of the breast implant or tissue expander prior to curing the shell of the silicone breast implant or tissue expander; curing the shell of the breast implant or tissue expander and the graft material; and removing the graft material from the breast implant or tissue expander after the curing step.” “19. The method of claim 13, wherein the graft material is removed from the breast implant or tissue expander after the curing step.” It is obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art that the application recites the same limitations as the patents but in a varied manner. The patent would be utilized to reject the application claims. Conclusion 4. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Suzette Gherbi whose telephone number is (571)272- 4751. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 7:00am-3:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http:/Avww.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Melanie Tyson can be reached on 571-272-9062. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent- center for more information about Patent Center and https:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197. /SUZETTE J GHERBI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3774 July 2, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 25, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12667458
TAPERED PROSTHETIC HEART VALVES WITH VALVULAR STRUCTURES FORMING TAPERED FLOW CHANNELS
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12661226
Method of Delivering a Transcutaneous Dual Valve Replacement Device to a Patient and Device Therefor
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12653674
TISSUE CLAMPING DEVICES
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12648843
PROSTHETIC IMPLANTS HAVING SHELLS WITH FLEXIBLE NEEDLE STOP PATCHES MADE OF TWO OR MORE LAYERS OF TEXTILE MATERIAL
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12642655
VALVE CLAMPING DEVICE WITH ADJUSTABLE BEARING FORCE AND VALVE CLAMPING SYSTEM
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+8.7%)
2y 5m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1380 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month