Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/785,615

LIGHT GUIDE PLATE, LIGHT GUIDE MEMBER AND BACKLIGHT UNIT INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 26, 2024
Examiner
DIAZ, JOSE
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Memslux
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
580 granted / 660 resolved
+19.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
672
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
35.8%
-4.2% vs TC avg
§102
44.0%
+4.0% vs TC avg
§112
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 660 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 8-11 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Hsu et al. (20050270802), Hsu hereinafter. Regarding claim 1, Hsu discloses a light guide plate (11, ¶ [19], fig. 3A) that allows light received and guided through one side surface (11s, hereinafter as denoted on the figures below) to be reflected and/or refracted by a bottom surface (111, ¶ [19], fig. 3A) and to be emitted through a top surface (112, ¶ [19], fig. 3A), wherein the bottom surface (111) comprises a plurality of engraved light emission patterns (113, ¶ [19], figs. 3A & 4B), wherein the bottom surface (111) comprises a plurality of outer inclined surfaces (1134, ¶ [24], figs. 4B & 5B) that define the light emission patterns (113), wherein the plurality of outer inclined surfaces (1134) comprises a first outer inclined surface (1134a, hereinafter as denoted on the figure below), a second outer inclined surface (1134b, hereinafter as denoted on the figure below), a third outer inclined surface (1134c, hereinafter as denoted on the figure below), and a fourth outer inclined surface (1134d, hereinafter as denoted on the figure below), wherein the first and third outer inclined surfaces (1134a & 1134c) each protrude in an outward direction and are disposed to face each other (see fig. 5B, and 4B depicted below), and one of the first and third outer inclined surfaces (1134a & 1134c) is disposed to face the one side surface (11s) (see fig. 5B, and 4B depicted below), and wherein the second and fourth outer inclined surfaces (1134b & 1134d) are disposed to face each other and disposed between the first and third outer inclined surfaces (1134a & 1134c) (see fig. 4B depicted below). PNG media_image1.png 417 538 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 635 547 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, Hsu discloses that the bottom surface (111) further comprises a flat inner top surface (111s, hereinafter as denoted on the figure below) and a protrusion (1131, ¶ [19], fig. 3A) that protrudes upward from the inner top surface (111s), and wherein the protrusion (1131) has a frustum shape having a width that gradually deceases in a direction in which the protrusion (1131) protrudes (see fig. 3A). PNG media_image3.png 425 567 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding claim 3, Hsu discloses that each of the second and fourth outer inclined surfaces (1134b & 1134d) is recessed in an inward direction (see fig. 5B, and 4B depicted above). Regarding claim 8, Hsu discloses a backlight unit (10, ¶ [19], fig. 3A) comprising: the light guide plate (11) of claim 1; and a light source (12, ¶ [19], fig. 3A) disposed on one side surface (11s) of the light guide plate (11). Regarding claim 9, Hsu discloses a light guide member (10, ¶ [19], fig. 3A) comprising: a light guide plate (11, ¶ [19], fig. 3A) configured to receive light through one side surface (11s, hereinafter as denoted on the figures below) and emit light through a top surface (112, ¶ [19], fig. 3A); and a light emission pattern layer disposed on a bottom surface (111, ¶ [19], fig. 3A) of the light guide plate (11), wherein the light emission pattern layer comprises a bottom surface (111) having a plurality of engraved light emission patterns (113, ¶ [19], figs. 3A & 4B), wherein the bottom surface (111) of the light emission pattern layer comprises a plurality of outer inclined surfaces (1134, ¶ [24], figs. 4B & 5B) that define the light emission patterns (113), wherein the plurality of outer inclined surfaces (1134) comprises a first outer inclined surface (1134a, hereinafter as denoted on the figure below), a second outer inclined surface (1134b, hereinafter as denoted on the figure below), a third outer inclined surface (1134c, hereinafter as denoted on the figure below), and a fourth outer inclined surface (1134d, hereinafter as denoted on the figure below), wherein the first and third outer inclined surfaces (1134a & 1134c) each protrude in an outward direction to face each other (see fig. 5B, and 4B depicted below), and one of the first and third outer inclined surfaces (1134a & 1134c) faces toward a surface parallel to the one side surface (11s) (see fig. 5B, and 4B depicted below), and wherein the second and fourth outer inclined surfaces (1134b & 1134d) are disposed to face each other and disposed between the first and third outer inclined surfaces (1134a & 1134c) (see fig. 4B depicted below). PNG media_image1.png 417 538 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 635 547 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 10, Hsu discloses that the bottom surface (111) of the light emission pattern further comprises a flat inner top surface (111s, hereinafter as denoted on the figure below) and a protrusion (1131) that protrudes upward from the inner top surface (111s), and wherein the protrusion (1131) has a frustum shape having a width that gradually deceases in a direction in which the protrusion (1131) protrudes (see fig. 3A). PNG media_image3.png 425 567 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding claim 11, Hsu discloses that each of the second and fourth outer inclined surfaces (1134b & 1134d) is recessed in an inward direction (see fig. 5B, and 4B depicted above). Regarding claim 16, Hsu discloses a backlight unit (10, ¶ [19], fig. 3A) comprising: the light guide plate (11) of claim 9; and a light source (12, ¶ [19], fig. 3A) disposed on one side surface (11s) of the light guide plate (11). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-7 and 12-15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if at least one the limitations indicated below were included in the base claim. Regarding claim 4, the references of Prior Art of record fails to teach or suggest the combination of the limitations as set forth in claim 4, and specifically comprising the limitation directed to a light distribution of the light guide plate is formed such that a light distribution in a horizontal direction parallel to the one side surface is relatively wider than that in a vertical direction perpendicular to the one side surface. Regarding claim 5, the references of Prior Art of record fails to teach or suggest the combination of the limitations as set forth in claim 5, and specifically comprising the limitation directed to a central angle of a fan using, as an arc, a line in contact with the bottom surface in the first or third outer inclined surface is an acute angle or an obtuse angle. Regarding claim 6, the references of Prior Art of record fails to teach or suggest the combination of the limitations as set forth in claim 6, and specifically comprising the limitation directed to each of the light emission patterns has a predetermined distortion within an angular range from -θ to +θ based on a reference axis parallel to the one side surface, and wherein the θ corresponds to a divergence angle of light incident to one side surface of the light guide plate in the light guide plate. Regarding claim 7, the claim is allowable for the reasons given in claim 6 because of their dependency status from claim 6. Regarding claim 12, the references of Prior Art of record fails to teach or suggest the combination of the limitations as set forth in claim 12, and specifically comprising the limitation directed to a light distribution of the light guide plate is formed such that a light distribution in a horizontal direction parallel to the one side surface is relatively wider than that in a vertical direction perpendicular to the one side surface. Regarding claim 13, the references of Prior Art of record fails to teach or suggest the combination of the limitations as set forth in claim 13, and specifically comprising the limitation directed to a central angle of a fan using, as an arc, a line in contact with the bottom surface of the light emission pattern layer in the first or third outer inclined surface is an acute angle or an obtuse angle. Regarding claim 14, the references of Prior Art of record fails to teach or suggest the combination of the limitations as set forth in claim 14, and specifically comprising the limitation directed to each of the light emission patterns has a predetermined distortion within an angular range from -θ to +θ based on a reference axis parallel to the one side surface, and wherein the θ corresponds to a divergence angle of light incident to one side surface of the light guide plate in the light guide plate. Regarding claim 15, the claim is allowable for the reasons given in claim 14 because of their dependency status from claim 14. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSE M. DIAZ whose telephone number is (571)272-9822. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00-4:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James R Greece can be reached at (571) 272-3711. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSE M DIAZ/ Examiner, Art Unit 2875 /ANNE M HINES/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 26, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604652
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING DISPLAY DEVICE, DISPLAY DEVICE, DISPLAY MODULE, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593586
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593593
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12581832
DISPLAY PANEL AND MOTHERBOARD STRUCTURE, DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581831
DISPLAY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+7.5%)
1y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 660 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month