Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/785,868

Petunia-Calibrachoa Variety SAKPXC036

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 26, 2024
Examiner
KRUSE, DAVID H
Art Unit
1663
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Sakata Seed Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1113 granted / 1365 resolved
+21.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
1396
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
38.6%
-1.4% vs TC avg
§102
10.2%
-29.8% vs TC avg
§112
34.5%
-5.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1365 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Status of the Application Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after allowance or after an Office action under Ex Parte Quayle, 25 USPQ 74, 453 O.G. 213 (Comm'r Pat. 1935). Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, prosecution in this application has been reopened pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12 May 2026 has been entered. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-8, 10-14 and 20 are allowed. Claim 20 is allowed in view of the Tsukahara Declaration filed under 37 C.F.R. 1.130(a) filed 14 May 2026 that provides evidence that petunia-calibrachoa variety ‘SAKPXC036’ does produce viable pollen. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 21-25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Applicant claims a method of producing a petunia-calibrachoa plant by propagating a vegetive cutting from a “petunia-calibrachoa” lant produced by a single cross between ‘SAKPXC036’ and another parental line plant (or itself), or by applying a plant breeding technique. Applicant describes petunia-calibrachoa variety ‘SAKPXC036’ predominantly by a deposit of biological material. Applicant describes producing petunia-calibrachoa variety ‘SAKPXC036’ by crossing Petunia hybrida line ‘PPBI’ female parent with Calibrachoa hybrida ‘7FS-6A-1BC-1’ male parent and selecting a single plant (page 3, paragraph 0020). It is unclear if either or both of the male and female parents are inbred lines. Applicant does not describe producing any “single cross” or “product of applying a plant breeding technique” from petunia-calibrachoa variety ‘SAKPXC036’. There is no way to predict what the product of the “single cross” or “product of applying a plant breeding technique” would be even if petunia-calibrachoa variety ‘SAKPXC036’ does produce viable pollen (Tsukahara Declaration filed under 37 C.F.R. 1.130(a) filed 14 May 2026). Hence, it is unclear that Applicant was in possession of the invention as broadly claimed. A method is not described if products used in the method are not described. See 64 Fed. Reg. 71427, 71428 (1999), comment No. 4. While a description of a representative number of species is adequate to represent an entire genus, wherein there is substantial variation within the genus, one must describe a sufficient variety of species to reflect the variation within the genus (see MPEP 2163). The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 22 and 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. At claim 22 is unclear what plant is being propagated via seed or tissue culture as the method of claim 21 recites “propagating a vegetive cutting”. Hence, the metes and bounds of the claim are unclear. At claim 24 is unclear what plant is being propagated via seed or tissue culture as the method of claim 23 recites “propagating a vegetive cutting”. Hence, the metes and bounds of the claim are unclear. Conclusion Claims 21-25 are rejected. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID H KRUSE whose telephone number is (571) 272-0799. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7AM-3:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amjad Abraham can be reached on (571) 270-7058. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /David H Kruse/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1663
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
May 14, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Nov 14, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 04, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jan 30, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 12, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 14, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 19, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12655438
AUGMENTED sgRNAS AND METHODS FOR THEIR USE TO ENHANCE SOMATIC AND GERMLINE PLANT GENOME ENGINEERING
4y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12653125
VARIETY CORN LINE KJD5384
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12653135
SOYBEAN VARIETY 5PHZL74
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12628752
Fungal Biocontrol
2y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12622375
High Rebaudioside M Stevia Plant Cultivars and Methods of Producing the Same
2y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+9.2%)
2y 5m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1365 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month