Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/786,102

MOBILE RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGING SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 26, 2024
Examiner
KIKNADZE, IRAKLI
Art Unit
2884
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Konica Minolta Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
937 granted / 1054 resolved
+20.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1084
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
§103
31.2%
-8.8% vs TC avg
§102
34.2%
-5.8% vs TC avg
§112
16.0%
-24.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1054 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 07/26/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Kang et al. (US PAP 2015/0139394 A1). With respect to claims 1 and 18, Kang et al. teaches a mobile radiographic imaging system, comprising (see abstract; Figs. 1-20; paragraphs 0008, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0020, 0048, 0051, 0052, 0057, 0097, 0105, 0114, 0119, 0120, 0137, 0143, 0163-0167, 0174-0189 and 0220-0225): PNG media_image1.png 371 449 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 452 469 media_image2.png Greyscale a radiation generating apparatus (100) that emits radiation (see Figs. 14 and 15); and a hardware processor (160) capable of setting the radiation generating apparatus to one of a plurality of modes including a first mode and a second mode (see mode controller (163)), the first mode being a mode in which the radiation generating apparatus performs moving image imaging with an allowable radiation dose, the second mode being a mode in which the radiation generating apparatus performs the moving image imaging with an allowable radiation dose smaller than the allowable radiation dose in the first mode (see Fig. 14; paragraphs 0114-0120, 0132, 0137, 0162-0167, 0191, 0194, 0196, 0204, 0221-0225; where the first mode is a fluoroscopy mode, and the second mode is a dynamic imaging mode (see paragraphs 0221 and 0222). In addition, it has been held that the recitation that an element is “capable of” perform a limitation is not a positive limitation but only requires the ability to so perform. It does not constitute a limitation in any patentable sense. Therefore, the limitations following the recitation “capable of” have not been considered in any patentable sense. PNG media_image3.png 394 451 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 472 416 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 464 451 media_image5.png Greyscale PNG media_image6.png 409 277 media_image6.png Greyscale With respect to claim 2, Kang et al. teaches the mobile radiographic imaging system according to claim 1 (see abstract; Figs. 1-20; paragraphs 0008, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0020, 0048, 0051, 0052, 0057, 0097, 0105, 0114, 0119, 0120, 0137, 0143, 0163-0167, 0174-0189 and 0220-0225), wherein an allowable time for the radiation generating apparatus to emit the radiation is shorter in the second mode than in the first mode. With respect to claim 3, Kang et al. teaches the mobile radiographic imaging system according to claim 1 (see abstract; Figs. 1-20; paragraphs 0008, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0020, 0048, 0051, 0052, 0057, 0097, 0105, 0114, 0119, 0120, 0137, 0143, 0163-0167, 0174-0189 and 0220-0225), wherein in a case where the second mode is selected, the radiation generation apparatus is not allowed to emit the radiation for the predetermined time or longer (see paragraphs 0013-0017, 0052, 0094, 0096, 0123, 0126, 0137, 0163-0168, 0191-0194, 0202 and 0207). With respect to claim 4, Kang et al. teaches the mobile radiographic imaging system according to claim 3 (see abstract; Figs. 1-20; paragraphs 0008, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0020, 0048, 0051, 0052, 0057, 0097, 0105, 0114, 0119, 0120, 0137, 0143, 0163-0167, 0174-0189 and 0220-0225), wherein in a case where the first mode is selected, the radiation generation apparatus is allowed to emit the radiation for the predetermined time or longer (see paragraphs 0013-0017, 0052, 0094, 0096, 0123, 0126, 0137, 0163-0168, 0191-0194, 0202 and 0207). With respect to claim 5, Kang et al. teaches the mobile radiographic imaging system according to claim 1 (see abstract; Figs. 1-20; paragraphs 0008, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0020, 0048, 0051, 0052, 0057, 0097, 0105, 0114, 0119, 0120, 0137, 0143, 0163-0167, 0174-0189 and 0220-0225), wherein the radiation generating apparatus stops emitting the radiation based on one of the allowable radiation doses (see paragraphs 0013-0017, 0052, 0094, 0096, 0123, 0126, 0137, 0163-0168, 0191-0194, 0202 and 0207). With respect to claim 6, Kang et al. teaches the mobile radiographic imaging system according to claim 1 (see abstract; Figs. 1-20; paragraphs 0008, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0020, 0048, 0051, 0052, 0057, 0097, 0105, 0114, 0119, 0120, 0137, 0143, 0163-0167, 0174-0189 and 0220-0225), wherein a number of allowable frames to be imaged by the radiation generation apparatus is smaller in the second mode than in the first mode (see paragraphs 0013-0017, 0052, 0094, 0096, 0123, 0126, 0137, 0163-0168, 0191-0194, 0202 and 0207). With respect to claim 7, Kang et al. teaches the mobile radiographic imaging system according to claim 1 (see abstract; Figs. 1-20; paragraphs 0008, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0020, 0048, 0051, 0052, 0057, 0097, 0105, 0114, 0119, 0120, 0137, 0143, 0163-0167, 0174-0189 and 0220-0225), wherein a frame rate when the radiation generating apparatus performs the moving image imaging is lower in the second mode than in the first mode (see paragraphs 0013-0017, 0052, 0094, 0096, 0123, 0126, 0137, 0163-0168, 0191-0194, 0202 and 0207). With respect to claim 8, Kang et al. teaches the mobile radiographic imaging system according to claim 1 (see abstract; Figs. 1-20; paragraphs 0008, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0020, 0048, 0051, 0052, 0057, 0097, 0105, 0114, 0119, 0120, 0137, 0143, 0163-0167, 0174-0189 and 0220-0225), wherein: the radiation generating apparatus emits the radiation which is pulsed radiation, and the radiation emitted by the radiation generating apparatus has a lower pulse duty ratio in the second mode than in the first mode (see paragraphs 0013-0017, 0052, 0094, 0096, 0123, 0126, 0137, 0163-0168, 0191-0194, 0202 and 0207). With respect to claim 9, Kang et al. teaches the mobile radiographic imaging system according to claim 1 (see abstract; Figs. 1-20; paragraphs 0008, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0020, 0048, 0051, 0052, 0057, 0097, 0105, 0114, 0119, 0120, 0137, 0143, 0163-0167, 0174-0189 and 0220-0225), wherein: the radiation generating apparatus emits the radiation that is pulsed radiation, and the radiation emitted by the radiation generating apparatus has a shorter pulse width in the second mode than in the first mode (see paragraphs 0050-0052, 0094 and 0191). With respect to claim 10, Kang et al. teaches the mobile radiographic imaging system according to claim 1 (see abstract; Figs. 1-20; paragraphs 0008, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0020, 0048, 0051, 0052, 0057, 0097, 0105, 0114, 0119, 0120, 0137, 0143, 0163-0167, 0174-0189 and 0220-0225), wherein: the radiation generating apparatus emits the radiation that is pulsed radiation, and the radiation emitted by the radiation generating apparatus has a longer pulse interval in the second mode than in the first mode (see paragraphs 0050-0052, 0094 and 0191). With respect to claim 11, Kang et al. teaches the mobile radiographic imaging system according to claim 1 (see abstract; Figs. 1-20; paragraphs 0008, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0020, 0048, 0051, 0052, 0057, 0097, 0105, 0114, 0119, 0120, 0137, 0143, 0163-0167, 0174-0189 and 0220-0225), wherein the radiation emitted by the radiation generation apparatus has a lower intensity in the second mode than in the first mode (see paragraphs 0005, 0149 and 0162-0170). With respect to claim 12, Kang et al. teaches the mobile radiographic imaging system according to claim 1 (see abstract; Figs. 1-20; paragraphs 0008, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0020, 0048, 0051, 0052, 0057, 0097, 0105, 0114, 0119, 0120, 0137, 0143, 0163-0167, 0174-0189 and 0220-0225), wherein the radiation generating apparatus when the radiation generating apparatus emits the radiation has a smaller tube current-time product in the second mode than in the first mode (see paragraphs 0048, 0051, 0094, 0096 and 0097). With respect to claim 13, Kang et al. teaches the mobile radiographic imaging system according to claim 1 (see abstract; Figs. 1-20; paragraphs 0008, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0020, 0048, 0051, 0052, 0057, 0097, 0105, 0114, 0119, 0120, 0137, 0143, 0163-0167, 0174-0189 and 0220-0225), wherein the radiation generating apparatus when the radiation generating apparatus emits the radiation has a smaller tube current of a tube in the second mode than in the first mode (see paragraphs 0048, 0051, 0094, 0096 and 0097). With respect to claim 14, Kang et al. teaches the mobile radiographic imaging system according to claim 1 (see abstract; Figs. 1-20; paragraphs 0008, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0020, 0048, 0051, 0052, 0057, 0097, 0105, 0114, 0119, 0120, 0137, 0143, 0163-0167, 0174-0189 and 0220-0225), wherein the radiation generating apparatus when the radiation generating apparatus emits the radiation has a lower tube voltage of a tube in the second mode than in the first mode (see paragraphs 0047, 0048, 0094 and 0096). With respect to claim 15, Kang et al. teaches the mobile radiographic imaging system according to claim 1 (see abstract; Figs. 1-20; paragraphs 0008, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0020, 0048, 0051, 0052, 0057, 0097, 0105, 0114, 0119, 0120, 0137, 0143, 0163-0167, 0174-0189 and 0220-0225), wherein: the radiation generating apparatus includes a shield (see a filter (141) and a collimator (131)), and the shield shields the radiation emitted in the second mode (see paragraphs 0105, 0116, 0117 and 0186). With respect to claim 16, Kang et al. teaches the mobile radiographic imaging system according to claim 1 (see abstract; Figs. 1-20; paragraphs 0008, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0020, 0048, 0051, 0052, 0057, 0097, 0105, 0114, 0119, 0120, 0137, 0143, 0163-0167, 0174-0189 and 0220-0225), wherein: the radiation generating apparatus includes a shield (see a filter (141) and a collimator (131)), and the shield reduces intensity of the radiation emitted in the second mode (see paragraphs 0105, 0116, 0117 and 0186). With respect to claim 17, Kang et al. teaches the mobile radiographic imaging system according to claim 1 (see abstract; Figs. 1-20; paragraphs 0008, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0020, 0048, 0051, 0052, 0057, 0097, 0105, 0114, 0119, 0120, 0137, 0143, 0163-0167, 0174-0189 and 0220-0225), wherein: the radiation generating apparatus includes a shield (see a filter (141) and a collimator (131)), and the shield narrows an area to be irradiated with the radiation emitted in the second mode (see paragraphs 0105, 0116, 0117 and 0186). With respect to claim 19, Kang et al. teaches the mobile radiographic imaging system according to claim 1 (see abstract; Figs. 1-20; paragraphs 0008, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0020, 0048, 0051, 0052, 0057, 0097, 0105, 0114, 0119, 0120, 0137, 0143, 0163-0167, 0174-0189 and 0220-0225), wherein the allowable radiation doses are effective doses (see paragraph 0167). With respect to claim 20, Kang et al. teaches the mobile radiographic imaging system according to claim 1 (see abstract; Figs. 1-20; paragraphs 0008, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0020, 0048, 0051, 0052, 0057, 0097, 0105, 0114, 0119, 0120, 0137, 0143, 0163-0167, 0174-0189 and 0220-0225), wherein the hardware processor (160) performs control such that a radiation dose is limited to be equal to or less than the allowable radiation dose in a set imaging mode, the set imaging mode being one of the first mode and the second mode (see Fig. 14; see paragraphs 0048, 0051, 0052, 0057, 0097, 0105, 0114, 0119, 0120, 0137, 0143, 0163-0167, 0174-0189 and 0220-0225). PNG media_image7.png 297 366 media_image7.png Greyscale With respect to claim 21, Kang et al. teaches the mobile radiographic imaging system according to claim 1 (see abstract; Figs. 1-20; paragraphs 0008, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0020, 0048, 0051, 0052, 0057, 0097, 0105, 0114, 0119, 0120, 0137, 0143, 0163-0167, 0174-0189 and 0220-0225), further comprising a display that displays a moving image imaged by the moving image imaging based on a set imaging mode, the set imaging mode being one of the first mode and the second mode, wherein in a case where the second mode is set by the hardware processor, real-time display of the moving image by the display is limited (see abstract; Figs. 1-20; paragraphs 0008, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0020, 0048, 0051, 0052, 0057, 0097, 0105, 0114, 0119, 0120, 0137, 0143, 0163-0167, 0174-0189 and 0220-0225). With respect to claim 22, Kang et al. teaches the mobile radiographic imaging system according to claim 1 (see abstract; Figs. 1-20; paragraphs 0008, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0020, 0048, 0051, 0052, 0057, 0097, 0105, 0114, 0119, 0120, 0137, 0143, 0163-0167, 0174-0189 and 0220-0225), wherein the hardware processor has a function to limit at least a setting of the first mode. With respect to claim 23, Kang et al. teaches the mobile radiographic imaging system according to claim 1 (see abstract; Figs. 1-20; paragraphs 0008, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0020, 0048, 0051, 0052, 0057, 0097, 0105, 0114, 0119, 0120, 0137, 0143, 0163-0167, 0174-0189 and 0220-0225), wherein in a case where the second mode is set, the hardware processor causes the radiation generating apparatus to stop emitting the radiation when an imaging time is equal to or longer than a predetermined time (see abstract; Figs. 1-20; paragraphs 0008, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0020, 0048, 0051, 0052, 0057, 0097, 0105, 0114, 0119, 0120, 0137, 0143, 0163-0167, 0174-0189 and 0220-0225). With respect to claim 24, Kang et al. teaches the mobile radiographic imaging system according to claim 1 (see abstract; Figs. 1-20; paragraphs 0008, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0020, 0048, 0051, 0052, 0057, 0097, 0105, 0114, 0119, 0120, 0137, 0143, 0163-0167, 0174-0189 and 0220-0225), further comprising an inputter that inputs a setting of the radiation generating apparatus to the hardware processor, wherein in a case where the second mode is set by the hardware processor, the inputter is prohibited from inputting a setting for an allowable radiation dose that exceeds an allowable radiation dose in the second mode (see abstract; Figs. 1-20; paragraphs 0008, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0020, 0048, 0051, 0052, 0057, 0097, 0105, 0114, 0119, 0120, 0137, 0143, 0163-0167, 0174-0189 and 0220-0225). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to IRAKLI KIKNADZE whose telephone number is (571)272-6494. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 AM - 6:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David J. Makiya can be reached at 571-272-2273. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Irakli Kiknadze /IRAKLI KIKNADZE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2884 /I.K./ March 5, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 26, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599347
X-RAY IMAGING APPARATUS AND X-RAY IMAGING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601694
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPROVED DATA HANDLING IN A COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12584838
Method For Density Measurement Of Materials Using Computed Tomography With Diffraction Artifact Correction
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588132
X-RAY SOURCE WITH MULTIPLE GRIDS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582361
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LOW-COUNT QUANTITATIVE PROJECTION DOMAIN SPECT IMAGING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+8.1%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1054 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month