Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/786,252

Computing System and Method for Accomplishing a Transaction Through a Proxy System

Non-Final OA §101§DP
Filed
Jul 26, 2024
Examiner
LOHARIKAR, ANAND R
Art Unit
3689
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
250 granted / 361 resolved
+17.3% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
392
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
37.5%
-2.5% vs TC avg
§103
23.3%
-16.7% vs TC avg
§102
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
§112
11.0%
-29.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 361 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims Status Claims 1-11 are pending and rejected. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 9/26/2025 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement has been considered by the examiner. Claim Objections The claims are objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 8, line 4, “and/or" should read – or -- In claim 11, line 9, “readable uniq10. A method for accomplishing" should read differently. Appropriate correction is required. Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-11 of prior U.S. Patent No. 12,051,098 (Application No. 17/531,223). This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Specifically, the instant claims are identical to the patented claims of 12,051,098, as follows: Instant claims 12,051,098 Patent (Claim 1) 1. A distributed computing system for accomplishing a transaction through a proxy system, the system comprising: 1. A distributed computing system for accomplishing a transaction through a proxy system, the system comprising: a product database, stored on a computing device and including multiple product records, each product record corresponding to one of plural items and including a unique product identifier that is machine-readable, a human-readable product name, and item attribute data indicating characteristics of a corresponding item; a product database, stored on a computing device and including multiple product records, each product record corresponding to one of plural items and including a unique product identifier that is machine-readable, a human-readable product name, and item attribute data indicating characteristics of a corresponding item; a supplier database, stored on a computing device and including multiple supplier records, each supplier record corresponding to one of plural item suppliers and including a machine-readable unique item supplier identifier, a human-readable item supplier name and item supplier attributes indicating characteristics of a corresponding item supplier; a supplier database, stored on a computing device and including multiple supplier records, each supplier record corresponding to one of plural item suppliers and including a machine-readable unique item supplier identifier, a human-readable item supplier name and item supplier attributes indicating characteristics of a corresponding item supplier; a supplier-product mapping database, stored on a computing device and including multiple mapping records, each mapping record corresponding to one of the unique item identifiers and including an item supplier product profile specifying at least one version of one of the items and at least one of the suppliers who is able to supply the at least one version of the item; a supplier-product mapping database, stored on a computing device and including multiple mapping records, each mapping record corresponding to one of the unique item identifiers and including an item supplier product profile specifying at least one version of one of the items and at least one of the suppliers who is able to supply the at least one version of the item; a customer profile database, stored on a computing device and including plural customer profile records, each customer profile record corresponding to a customer and including a unique customer identifier, a delivery address corresponding to the unique customer, payment information corresponding to the unique customer and contact information corresponding to the unique customer; a customer profile database, stored on a computing device and including plural customer profile records, each customer profile record corresponding to a customer and including a unique customer identifier, a delivery address corresponding to the unique customer, payment information corresponding to the unique customer and contact information corresponding to the unique customer; a supplier query module configured to query the supplier-product mapping database to thereby determine at least one supplier of the item; a supplier query module configured to query the supplier-product mapping database to thereby determine at least one supplier of the item; a product query module configured to query the product database to thereby determine attributes of the item of interest; a product query module configured to query the product database to thereby determine attributes of the item of interest; a client module including a client-side component configured to execute on a client device associated with at least one of the customers, the client module including: a client module including a client-side component configured to execute on a client device associated with at least one of the customers, the client module including: a browsing observation service module configured to recognize an item of interest to a corresponding customer based on content being displayed on the client device and correlate a unique item identifier with the item of interest; and a browsing observation service module configured to recognize an item of interest to a corresponding customer based on content being displayed on the client device and correlate a unique item identifier with the item of interest; and a browsing augmentation service module configured to present an additional user interface on the client device, which augments a user interface of the content, when the client device is viewing the content, the additional user interface including at least one attribute of the item of interest returned from the product database and at least one supplier of the item of interest returned from the supplier-product mapping database, the user interface including a purchase selection element; and a browsing augmentation service module configured to present an additional user interface on the client device, which augments a user interface of the content, when the client device is viewing the content, the additional user interface including at least one attribute of the item of interest returned from the product database and at least one supplier of the item of interest returned from the supplier-product mapping database, the user interface including a purchase selection element; and a proxy purchase service module configured to execute a purchase function for the item of interest from the at least one item supplier in response to a user selection of the purchase element and in accordance with a record corresponding the customer in the customer profile database. a proxy purchase service module configured to execute a purchase function for the item of interest from the at least one item supplier in response to a user selection of the purchase element and in accordance with a record corresponding the customer in the customer profile database. Dependent claims 2-11 are identical to ‘098 as follows: Instant claims 12,051,098 Patent Claims Claim 2 Claim 2 Claim 3 Claim 3 Claim 4 Claim 4 Claim 5 Claim 5 Claim 6 Claim 6 Claim 7 Claim 7 Claim 8 Claim 8 Claim 9 Claim 9 Claim 10 Claim 10 Claim 11 Claim 11 Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANAND LOHARIKAR whose telephone number is 571-272-8756. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday, 9am – 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Marissa Thein can be reached at 571-272-6764. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANAND LOHARIKAR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3689
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 26, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12586115
FACET-BASED CONTEXT-AWARE USER INTERFACES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586108
A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING THE DUPLICATE PRODUCT ON THE E-COMMERCE PLATFORMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12572974
AUTOMATIC PROCESSING AND MATCHING OF INVOICES TO PURCHASE ORDERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12561732
COMPUTING DEVICES AND SYSTEMS FOR SENDING AND RECEIVING A DIGITAL GIFT USING A VOICE INTERFACE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12561722
UTILIZING TREND SETTER BEHAVIOR TO PREDICT ITEM DEMAND AND DISTRIBUTE RELATED DIGITAL CONTENT ACROSS DIGITAL PLATFORMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+25.3%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 361 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month