Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/786,290

MEMORY CONTROLLER, MEMORY SYSTEM, AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 26, 2024
Priority
Oct 27, 2017 — RE 10-2017-0141380 +7 more
Examiner
MAMO, ELIAS
Art Unit
2184
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
SK hynix Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
776 granted / 937 resolved
+27.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
953
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
§103
60.5%
+20.5% vs TC avg
§102
12.2%
-27.8% vs TC avg
§112
12.7%
-27.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 937 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 05/11/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 19-28, 30-40, 42 and 43 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kang (US 2016/0154594), hereinafter referred to as Kang in view of Lee (US 2015/0347314), hereinafter referred to as Lee and Hahn (US 2016/0274797), hereinafter referred to Hahn. Referring to claim 19, Kang teaches, as claimed, a memory controller, comprising: a cache memory (i.e.-buffer 1240, see fig. 2); and a host control circuit (i.e.-host interface 1220, see fig. 2) configured to read out mapping information corresponding to a logical address from the buffer memory device (i.e.-retrieve mapping information associated with a logical address form a memory system 1100, page 5, ¶91, lines 3-6; and ¶84), and cache the mapping information in the cache memory (i.e.-load the retrieved mapping information into buffer 1240, page 5, ¶91, lines 3-6). However, Kang does not teach the caching of the mapping information being before transferring the logical address to a flash translation layer; and a buffer memory device configured to store address mapping information loaded from a nonvolatile memory device. On the other hand, Lee teaches a nonvolatile memory system comprised of a memory controller and, a buffer memory device configured to store address mapping information loaded from a nonvolatile memory device (page 1, ¶5). Furthermore, Hahn discloses a method and system for prefetching mapping information (i.e.-storing FTL table in a host memory buffer, page 1, ¶19, lines 6-10 and page 2, ¶27), before transferring the logical address to a flash translation layer (i.e.-thereby, any logical address given by the host is converted to physical address, page 2, ¶34, lines 14-18). Therefore, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify the teachings of Kang so that the caching of the mapping information being before transferring the logical address to a flash translation layer; and a buffer memory device configured to store address mapping information loaded from a nonvolatile memory device, as taught by Lee and Hahn. The motivation for doing so would have been to reduce command response time delay by loading mapping data form the nonvolatile memory into the buffer, thereby improving system performance. As to claim 20, the modified Kang teaches the memory controller of claim 19, further comprising: a flash translation layer configured to read a physical address corresponding to the logical address from the mapping information cached in the cache memory (see Kang, page 5, ¶90, lines 6-7 and ¶96). As to claim 21, the modified Kang teaches the memory controller of claim 19, wherein the host control circuit is configured to receive a read command including the logical address from a host (see Kang, page 5, ¶89 and ¶96). As to claim 22, the modified Kang in view of Lee teaches the memory controller of claim 19, further comprising: a flash control circuit configured to read data corresponding to the read command from a nonvolatile memory device based on the physical address (see Lee, page 3, ¶52, lines 6-10). As to claim 23, the modified Kang teaches the memory controller of claim 19, further comprising an error correction circuit coupled between the buffer memory device and the cache memory (see Kang, page 4, ¶73, lines 6-7 and see fig. 2). As to claim 24, the modified Kang teaches the memory controller of claim 23, wherein the error correction circuit is configured to perform an ECC decoding operation on the mapping information output from the buffer memory device and to provide decoded mapping information (see Kang, page 5, ¶92). As to claim 25, the modified Kang innately teaches the memory controller of claim 24, wherein the cache memory caches the decoded mapping information (see Kang, page 6, ¶111, lines 1-6 and page 7, ¶122). As to claim 26, the modified Kang in view of Lee teaches the memory controller of claim 19, wherein the buffer memory device is configured to buffer the data read from the nonvolatile memory device (see Lee, ¶47, lines 12-16 and page 3, ¶48, lines 5-6). As to claim 27, the modified Kang teaches the memory controller of claim 19, wherein when the host control circuit receives a write command, a write logical address, and write data from the host (see Kang, page 9, ¶152, lines 1-6), the flash translation layer is configured to map a write physical address to the write logical address (see Kang, page 4, ¶71), and to update mapping information stored in the buffer memory device with the write physical address mapped to the write logical address (see Kang, page 6, ¶112). As to claim 28, the modified Kang teaches the memory controller of claim 22, wherein the flash control circuit programs the write data in the nonvolatile device based on the write physical address (see Kang, page 4, ¶67, lines 1-4 and page 5, ¶96). As to claim 30, the modified Kang teaches the memory controller of claim 27, wherein the flash translation layer updates the mapping information stored in the buffer memory device by writing modified chunk data including the modified section data to the buffer memory device (see Kang, page 6, ¶111, lines 1-7 and ¶112, lines 4-8). Referring to claims 31-40, 42 and 43, the claims are substantially the same as claims 21-28 and 30, hence the rejection of claims 21-28 and 30 is applied accordingly. Examiner’s note: Examiner has cited particular columns and line numbers in the references applied to the claims above for the convenience of the Applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings of the art and are applied to specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply as well. It is respectfully requested from the Applicant in preparing responses, to fully consider the references in entirety as potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of the passages as taught by the prior art or disclosed by the Examiner. Claim Objections Claims 29 and 41 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed on 11/26/2025 have been fully considered but they are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ELIAS MAMO whose telephone number is (571)270-1726. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thu, 7 AM - 5 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, HENRY TSAI can be reached at 571-272-4176. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Elias Mamo/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2184
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Apr 21, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Nov 26, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 12, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 10, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 14, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12737268
SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO PRECONFIGURE A HARDWARE MODULE
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12724705
DATA ORGANIZATION FOR LOGICAL TO PHYSICAL TABLE COMPRESSION
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12717318
COMPLEMENTARY ARCHITECTURE FOR VERIFYING INPUT DATA IN REDUNDANT MODULES
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12712759
SUBSCRIBER STATION AND METHOD FOR DETERMINISTIC COMMUNICATION IN A SERIAL BUS SYSTEM
1y 9m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12704995
QUICK CHARGE LOSS MITIGATION USING TWO-PASS CONTROLLED DELAY
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+5.9%)
2y 6m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 937 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month