Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/787,130

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR USER ENROLLMENT IN A SECURE BIOMETRIC VERIFICATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §DOUBLEPATENT
Filed
Jul 29, 2024
Priority
Jun 29, 2011 — provisional 61/502,453 +7 more
Examiner
ULLAH, SHARIF E
Art Unit
2495
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Secure Idenity LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
383 granted / 454 resolved
+26.4% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
476
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
22.3%
-17.7% vs TC avg
§103
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
§102
17.3%
-22.7% vs TC avg
§112
20.1%
-19.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 454 resolved cases

Office Action

§DOUBLEPATENT
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 07/29/2024 has been placed in record and considered by the examiner. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP §§ 706.02(l)(1) - 706.02(l)(3) for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 20-40 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 U.S. Patent No. 12079321. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claimed limitations are similar in scope, and because claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12079321 contains every element of claims 20-40 of the instant application and thus anticipate the claims of the instant application. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 21-40 would be allowable if the applicant overcame the rejection(s) under Double Patenting . Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FARID HOMAYOUNMEHR whose telephone number is (571)272-3739. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday, 9 am to 5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Farid Homayounmehr can be reached on 571 272 3739. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHARIF E ULLAH/ Examiner, Art Unit 2495
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 29, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640918
Decision Engine Consistency Verification System
2y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12627465
ATTRIBUTE BASED ENCRYPTION WITH BOUNDED COLLUSION RESISTANCE
2y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12621133
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR QUANTUM-SECURE MICROGRIDS
2y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12602518
INTEGRATING A DOCUMENT SIGNATURE SYSTEM WITH AN ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
3y 3m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603863
Hybrid Cryptography Virtual Private Networks
1y 11m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+22.2%)
2y 6m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 454 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month