Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/787,786

WEB SERVICES FOR QUERYABLE ENTITY GRAPH WITH CURRENT AND HISTORICAL SENSOR DATA

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Jul 29, 2024
Examiner
ORTIZ DITREN, BELIX M
Art Unit
2164
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Tyco Fire & Security GmbH
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
579 granted / 689 resolved
+29.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
703
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
14.9%
-25.1% vs TC avg
§103
39.2%
-0.8% vs TC avg
§102
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
§112
10.6%
-29.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 689 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Remarks In response to the RCE communication files on March 9, 2026, claims 1, 10, and 19-20 are amended by applicant's request. Therefore, claims 1-20 are presently pending in the application. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 3/9/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to an abstract idea without significantly more. Regarding claims 1, 10, and 19, Step 1 Analysis: The claim is directed to a "web platform, comprising one or more computer readable storage media storing instructions." This falls within the statutory categories of a machine or manufacture (computer-readable media). Step 2A Prong 1 Analysis: Claims 1, 10, 19 recites, The limitations of: generate an entity graph for a building environment, the entity graph including a plurality of entities including attributes and the entity graph including relational objects indicating relationships between the plurality of entities, the plurality of entities comprising a sensor entity representing a sensor of the building environment and a shadow entity storing past measurements of the sensor, the sensor entity including a dynamic attribute to store a present measurement of the sensor, and the relational objects including a relational object between the shadow entity and the sensor entity; store the measurement in the dynamic attribute of the sensor entity and the shadow entity according to the relational object; and search, based on at least one query, the plurality of entities, the attributes, and the relationships of the entity graph to return a result for the at least one query, wherein the result is determined based at least in part on relational object between the shadow entity and the sensor entity can be considered to be an evaluation in the human mind. The claim recites limitations that describe the abstract concept of organizing data in a logical manner and performing mental processes (comparison, searching) that can be performed by a human, at least in principle, using pen and paper. The core functionality is generating an "entity graph" with entities, attributes, and relationships, storing data ("measurements") in specific locations ("dynamic attribute," "shadow entity"), and searching that data. These activities are fundamental data management tasks long prevalent in human activity and commerce. Step 2A Prong 2 Analysis: The "web platform," "computer readable storage media," "instructions thereon," and "processors" are all generic computer components. The "building environment" limitation is a mere field-of-use limitation and does not impose a meaningful technological constraint on the abstract process itself. The method steps of "generating," "receiving," "storing," and "searching" data describe routine, conventional functions performed by generic computer systems. Step 2B Analysis: The claim lacks such a concept, describing conventional data storage and retrieval methods using generic computing functions and technology. Faster computer implementation of an abstract task is not sufficient for patent eligibility. Please see MPEP 2106.05(f). The limitations of receiving information and model configuration information from a client device are well-understood, routine, and conventional as evidenced by MPEP §2106.05(d)(II)(I), “transmitting data over a network”. Even when considered in combination, these additional elements amount to mere instructions to apply the exception using generic computer components and insignificant extra-solution activity which cannot provide an inventive concept. The claim is not patent eligible. Regarding claims 2-9, 11-18, and 20, the rejection of claims 1, 10, and 19 is further incorporated, the claim recites: searching plurality of entities…receive new measurements…, updating…, calculate an average that falls into the abstract idea of mathematic concepts, This limitation amounts to an insignificant extra-solution activity. See MPEP 2106.05(g). The claim does not include any additional elements that amount to significantly more than the judicial exception. Organizing information in a logical manner (using a graph with entities, attributes, and relationships) and using it for searching, and lacks sufficient "inventive concept" to transform it into a patent-eligible application. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BELIX M ORTIZ DITREN whose telephone number is (571)272-4081. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am -5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amy Ng can be reached at 571-270-1698. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BELIX M. ORTIZ DITREN Primary Examiner Art Unit 2164 /Belix M Ortiz Ditren/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2164
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 29, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 14, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101
Aug 13, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 13, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 11, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 13, 2025
Final Rejection — §101
Feb 06, 2026
Interview Requested
Feb 12, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 17, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 19, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 09, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 14, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12586399
DATE AND TIME FEATURE IDENTIFICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12572527
MULTI-SOURCE DATA SUGGESTION MANAGEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12566735
NETWORK FILE SYSTEM SERVER PROXY AND PROTOCOL TRANSLATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12536142
PROVIDING SCALABLE AND CONCURRENT FILE SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12530333
STRUCTURAL DATA MATCHING USING NEURAL NETWORK ENCODERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+2.0%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 689 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month