Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/787,800

AUTHORIZATION METHOD AND APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 29, 2024
Priority
Jan 29, 2022 — CN 202210112998.9 +1 more
Examiner
BROWN, VERNAL U
Art Unit
2686
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
826 granted / 1186 resolved
+7.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1242
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
§103
56.8%
+16.8% vs TC avg
§102
24.0%
-16.0% vs TC avg
§112
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1186 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This office action is in response to communication filed 7/10/26. Response to Amendment The examiner acknowledges the amendment of claims 1-2,4-6,8-9, and 11-20. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Patterson US Patent 10,192373 in view of Huang US Patent Application Publication 2024/0333342. Regarding claim 1, Patterson teaches an authorization method, comprising: Receiving, by a session management function, first authorization information from a first authorization device (reader) and determining that communication authorization performed by the first authorization device on a terminal device (RFID tag) succeeds (col. 2 line 55-col. 3 line 10,col. 3 lines 48-67); sending by a network exposure function, a request message to a second authorization device when the terminal device moves out of an area corresponding to the first authorization device, the request message being used to request the second authorization device perform communication authorization on the terminal device, and the second authorization device is an authorization device corresponding to an area in which the terminal device is located after the terminal device moves out of the area corresponding to the first authorization device (col. 7 lines 10-65, col. 8 lines 7-22); and receiving, by the network exposure function, second authorization information from the second authorization device and determining a result of communication authorization performed by the second authorization device on the terminal device (authorization is required for each restricted area, col. 12 lines 32-45,col. 13 lines 52-col. 14 line 9, col. 16 line 62-col. 17 line 36). Patterson is silent on teaching the use of a session management function (SMF) and a network exposure function. Huang in an analogous art teaches the network include a session management function (SMF) and a network exposure function in order to provide for the automation and optimization of the network (paragraph 053). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the system of Patterson as disclosed by Huang because such modification represent an improvement over the system of Patterson in order to provide for the automation and optimization of the network Regarding claim 2, Patterson teaches obtaining first information from the first authorization device, wherein the first information indicates to re-perform communication authorization (authorization is required for each restricted area, moving to another restricted area represent re-performing authorization) on the terminal device (col. 12 lines 32-49, col. 15 lines 34-49); and the sending by the request message to a second authorization device comprises sending the request message to the second authorization device based on the first information (col. 17 lines 6-25, col. 15 lines 13-25). Patterson is silent on teaching the use of a session management function (SMF) and a network exposure function. Huang in an analogous art teaches the network include a session management function (SMF) and a network exposure function in order to provide for the automation and optimization of the network (paragraph 053). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the system of Patterson as disclosed by Huang because such modification represent an improvement over the system of Patterson in order to provide for the automation and optimization of the network Regarding claim 3, Patterson teaches information indicating to change an authorization device, information indicating that authorization of the first authorization device is invalid, or identification information of the second authorization device (col. 4 lines 18-31). Regarding claim 4, Patterson teaches receiving, by the first authorization device, first information indicating that the terminal device moves out of the area corresponding to the first authorization device (col. 7 lines 51-65). Regarding claim 5, Patterson teaches obtaining, by the first authorization device, location information of the terminal device; and determining, by the first authorization device, based on the location information and the area corresponding to the first authorization device, that the terminal device moves out of the area corresponding to the first authorization device (col. 7 lines 51-65). Regarding claim 6, Patterson teaches receiving information that is from the first authorization device and that is about the area corresponding to the first authorization device (interrogation signal is received from the reader, col. 10 lines 38-51). Patterson is silent on teaching the use of a session management function (SMF) and a network exposure function. Huang in an analogous art teaches the network include a session management function (SMF) and a network exposure function in order to provide for the automation and optimization of the network (paragraph 053). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the system of Patterson as disclosed by Huang because such modification represent an improvement over the system of Patterson in order to provide for the automation and optimization of the network Regarding claim 7, Patterson teaches obtaining the identification information of the second authorization device. (the zone in which the reader is located is obtained, col. 17 lines 37-54) Regarding claim 8, Patterson teaches receiving the identification information of the second authorization device from the terminal device, the first authorization device, or a data management network element (col. 22 lines 7-20). Patterson is silent on teaching the use of a session management function (SMF) and a network exposure function. Huang in an analogous art teaches the network include a session management function (SMF) and a network exposure function in order to provide for the automation and optimization of the network (paragraph 053). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the system of Patterson as disclosed by Huang because such modification represent an improvement over the system of Patterson in order to provide for the automation and optimization of the network Regarding claim 9. Patterson teaches an authorization method, comprising: sending, by a first authorization device, authorization information to a network exposure function,, the authorization information indicating a result of communication authorization performed by the first authorization device on a terminal device (controller transmit information to the server regarding result of authentication, unlocking, col. 12 lines 16-31); and sending, by the first authorization device, first information when the terminal device moves out of an area corresponding to the first authorization device, the first information indicating to re-perform communication authorization on the terminal device (col. 7 lines 51-col. 8 line 29). Patterson is silent on teaching the use of a session management function (SMF) and a network exposure function. Huang in an analogous art teaches the network include a session management function (SMF) and a network exposure function in order to provide for the automation and optimization of the network (paragraph 053). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the system of Patterson as disclosed by Huang because such modification represent an improvement over the system of Patterson in order to provide for the automation and optimization of the network Regarding claim 10, Patterson teaches information indicating to change an authorization device, information indicating that authorization of the first authorization device is invalid, or identification information of the second authorization device (col. 4 lines 18-31). Regarding claim 11, Patterson teaches obtaining, location information of the terminal device and obtaining, the identification information of the second authorization device based on the location information of the terminal device and information about an area corresponding to one or more authorization devices (col. 22 lines 7-20). Patterson is silent on teaching the use of a session management function (SMF) and a network exposure function. Huang in an analogous art teaches the network include a session management function (SMF) and a network exposure function in order to provide for the automation and optimization of the network (paragraph 053). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the system of Patterson as disclosed by Huang because such modification represent an improvement over the system of Patterson in order to provide for the automation and optimization of the network Regarding claim 12, Patterson teaches receiving the identification information of the second authorization device from the terminal device, the first authorization device, or a data management network element (col. 22 lines 7-20). Patterson is silent on teaching the use of a session management function (SMF) and a network exposure function. Huang in an analogous art teaches the network include a session management function (SMF) and a network exposure function in order to provide for the automation and optimization of the network (paragraph 053). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the system of Patterson as disclosed by Huang because such modification represent an improvement over the system of Patterson in order to provide for the automation and optimization of the network Regarding claim 13, Patterson teaches determining by that communication authorization performed on the terminal device succeeds (col. 12 lines 16-31). Patterson is silent on teaching the use of a session management function (SMF) and a network exposure function. Huang in an analogous art teaches the network include a session management function (SMF) and a network exposure function in order to provide for the automation and optimization of the network (paragraph 053). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the system of Patterson as disclosed by Huang because such modification represent an improvement over the system of Patterson in order to provide for the automation and optimization of the network. Regarding claim 14, Patterson teaches a system comprising: receive first authorization information from a first authorization device (reader)and determine that communication authorization performed by the first authorization device on a terminal device (RFID tag) succeeds (col. 2 line 55-col. 3 line 10,col. 3 lines 48-67); and a network exposure function configured to: send a request message to a second authorization device when the terminal device moves out of an area corresponding to the first authorization device, the request message being used to request the second authorization device perform communication authorization on the terminal device, and the second authorization device is an authorization device corresponding to an area in which the terminal device is located after the terminal device moves out of the area corresponding to the first authorization device (col. 7 lines 10-65, col. 8 lines 7-22); and receive second authorization information from the second authorization device and determine a result of communication authorization performed by the second authorization device on the terminal device (col. 12 lines 32-45,col. 13 lines 52-col. 14 line 9, col. 16 line 62-col. 17 line 36). Patterson is silent on teaching the use of a session management function (SMF) and a network exposure function. Huang in an analogous art teaches the network include a session management function (SMF) and a network exposure function in order to provide for the automation and optimization of the network (paragraph 053). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the system of Patterson as disclosed by Huang because such modification represent an improvement over the system of Patterson in order to provide for the automation and optimization of the network Regarding claim 15. Patterson teaches obtaining first information from the first authorization device, wherein the first information indicates to re-perform communication (authorization is required for each restricted area, moving to another restricted area represent re-performing authorization) on the terminal device (col. 12 lines 32-49, col. 15 lines 34-49) authorization on the terminal device and is further configure to send a request message to a second authorization device comprises sending the request message to the second authorization device based on the first information (col. 17 lines 6-25, col. 15 lines 13-25). Patterson is silent on teaching the use of a session management function (SMF) and a network exposure function. Huang in an analogous art teaches the network include a session management function (SMF) and a network exposure function in order to provide for the automation and optimization of the network (paragraph 053). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the system of Patterson as disclosed by Huang because such modification represent an improvement over the system of Patterson in order to provide for the automation and optimization of the network Regarding claim 16, Patterson teaches information indicating to change an authorization device, information indicating that authorization of the first authorization device is invalid, or identification information of the second authorization device (col. 4 lines 18-31). Regarding claim 17, Patterson teaches receiving first information indicating that the terminal device moves out of the area corresponding to the first authorization device (col. 7 lines 51-65). Patterson is silent on teaching the use of a session management function (SMF) and a network exposure function. Huang in an analogous art teaches the network include a session management function (SMF) and a network exposure function in order to provide for the automation and optimization of the network (paragraph 053). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the system of Patterson as disclosed by Huang because such modification represent an improvement over the system of Patterson in order to provide for the automation and optimization of the network Regarding claim 18, Patterson teaches receiving the first information indicating that the terminal device moves out of the area corresponding to the authorization device comprises: obtaining, by the first authorization device, location information of the terminal device; and determining, by the first authorization device, based on the location information and the area corresponding to the first authorization device, that the terminal device moves out of the area corresponding to the first authorization device (col. 7 lines 51-65). Patterson is silent on teaching the use of a session management function (SMF) and a network exposure function. Huang in an analogous art teaches the network include a session management function (SMF) and a network exposure function in order to provide for the automation and optimization of the network (paragraph 053). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the system of Patterson as disclosed by Huang because such modification represent an improvement over the system of Patterson in order to provide for the automation and optimization of the network Regarding claim 19, Patterson teaches receiving information that is from the first authorization device and that is about the area corresponding to the first authorization device (interrogation signal is received from the reader, col. 10 lines 38-51). Patterson is silent on teaching the use of a session management function (SMF) and a network exposure function. Huang in an analogous art teaches the network include a session management function (SMF) and a network exposure function in order to provide for the automation and optimization of the network (paragraph 053). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the system of Patterson as disclosed by Huang because such modification represent an improvement over the system of Patterson in order to provide for the automation and optimization of the network Regarding claim 20, Patterson teaches before the sending the request, receiving the identification information of the second authorization device from the terminal device, the first authorization device, or a data management network element (col. 22 lines 7-20). Patterson is silent on teaching the use of a session management function (SMF) and a network exposure function. Huang in an analogous art teaches the network include a session management function (SMF) and a network exposure function in order to provide for the automation and optimization of the network (paragraph 053). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the system of Patterson as disclosed by Huang because such modification represent an improvement over the system of Patterson in order to provide for the automation and optimization of the network Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VERNAL U BROWN whose telephone number is (571)272-3060. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8AM-5PM, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven Lim can be reached at 571 270 1210. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VERNAL U BROWN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2686
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 29, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Dec 22, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 10, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12687839
CHEMICAL STORAGE CONTAINER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR SEMICONDUCTOR PROCESS USING SHORT-RANGE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12688743
MULTI-FACTOR AUTHENTICATION FOR PREMISES MONITORING SYSTEMS
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12676035
ACCESS CARD PROVIDING METHOD, ACCESS CARD CHECKING METHOD, AND APPARATUS FOR PERFORMING SAME METHODS
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676038
ENTRY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, ENTRY MANAGEMENT METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667308
SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND APPARATUS FOR ENHANCED HEADSETS
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+13.8%)
3y 0m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1186 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month