Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/788,603

PIPELINE SUCCESSIVE APPROXIMATION ANALOG-TO-DIGITAL CONVERTER RESIDUE AMPLIFIER OFFSET CANCELLATION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 30, 2024
Priority
Sep 07, 2023 — provisional 63/581,026
Examiner
NGUYEN, LINH V
Art Unit
2845
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
MediaTek Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
1057 granted / 1186 resolved
+21.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
1214
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
72.2%
+32.2% vs TC avg
§102
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
§112
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1186 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 2. This office action is in response to communication filed on 07/30/2024. Claims 1 – 20 are pending on this application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 3. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 4. Claims 1-4, 15-18 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Li et al. U.S. patent No. 10,608,655. Regarding claim 1. Fig. 5 of Li et al. discloses a method of calibrating a residue amplifier (RGA 116; Col. 1 lines 34-36) in a pipelined analog-to-digital converter (Col. 9 lines 37-38), comprising: obtaining a first calibrated gain (Col. 9 lines 59-60) of a residue amplifier (116) that amplifies a first residue voltage (Col. 9 lines 59-60), which is output from a capacitive digital-to-analog converter (112; see Fig. 2) of a first stage (Col. 9 lines 40-42) of the pipelined ADC (Col. 9 lines 37-38), to a voltage output (first output voltage of 116) corresponding to a first output code (D1) of a second stage (162, 164) of the pipelined ADC (Col. 9 lines 37-38); obtaining a second calibrated gain (Col. 9 lines 62-64) of the residue amplifier (119) that amplifies a second residue voltage (Col. 9 lines 62-64), which is output from the CDAC (DAC 112) of the first stage of the pipelined ADC (Col. 9 lines 40-42), to a voltage (second voltage output of 116 ) corresponding to a second output code (D2) of the second stage (162, 164) of the pipelined ADC (Col. 9 lines 40-42); and determining a final calibrated gain (determining 166 and CAL ENGINE) of the residue amplifier (RGA 116, Col. 1 lines 34-36) based on the first calibrated gain (Col. 9 lines 59-60) and the second calibrated gain (Col. 9 lines 62-64). Regarding claim 2. The method of claim 1, Fig. 10 and Fig. 11 of Li et al. further discloses wherein the first residue voltage (Col. 9 lines 59-60) is a positive voltage (VREFP) and the second residue voltage (Col. 9 lines 62-64) is a negative voltage (VREFN). Regarding claim 3. The method of claim 2, Fig. 3 of Li et al. further discloses wherein the first residue voltage (Col. 9 lines 59-60) corresponds to 1 least significant bit (LSB b0 connected to positive reference Vrp) and the second residue voltage (Col. 9 lines 62-64) corresponds to -1 LSB (LSB b0 connected to negative reference Vrn) Regarding claim 4. The method of claim 1, Fig. 5 further discloses wherein determining the final calibrated gain (determining 166 and CAL ENGINE) comprises calculating an average (Col. 9 lines 15-17) of the first calibrated gain (Col. 9 lines 59-60) and the second calibrated gain (Col. 9 lines 62-64). Regarding claim 15. Fig. 5 of Li et al. discloses an apparatus (160) for calibrating a residue amplifier (RGA 116; Col. 1 lines 34-36) in a pipelined analog-to-digital converter (Col. 9 lines 37-38), the apparatus (160) being a controller (Col. 3 lines 50-55) , comprising: a memory (Co. 14 lines 50-60); and at least one processor (Col. 14 lines 50-60) coupled to the memory (Col. 14 line 50-60) and configured to: obtaining a first calibrated gain (Col. 9 lines 59-60) of a residue amplifier (116) that amplifies a first residue voltage (Col. 9 lines 59-60), which is output from a capacitive digital-to-analog converter (112; see Fig. 2) of a first stage (Col. 9 lines 40-42) of the pipelined ADC (Col. 9 lines 37-38), to a voltage output (first output voltage of 116) corresponding to a first output code (D1) of a second stage (162, 164) of the pipelined ADC (Col. 9 lines 37-38); obtaining a second calibrated gain (Col. 9 lines 62-64) of the residue amplifier (119) that amplifies a second residue voltage (Col. 9 lines 62-64), which is output from the CDAC (DAC 112) of the first stage of the pipelined ADC (Col. 9 lines 40-42), to a voltage (second voltage output of 116 ) corresponding to a second output code (D2) of the second stage (162, 164) of the pipelined ADC (Col. 9 lines 40-42); and determining a final calibrated gain (determining 166 and CAL ENGINE) of the residue amplifier (RGA 116, Col. 1 lines 34-36) based on the first calibrated gain (Col. 9 lines 59-60) and the second calibrated gain (Col. 9 lines 62-64). Regarding claim 16. The apparatus of claim 15, Fig. 10 and Fig. 11 of Li et al. further discloses wherein the first residue voltage (Col. 9 lines 59-60) is a positive voltage (VREFP) and the second residue voltage (Col. 9 lines 62-64) is a negative voltage (VREFN). Regarding clam 17. The apparatus of claim 16, Fig. 3 of Li et al. further discloses wherein the first residue voltage (Col. 9 lines 59-60) corresponds to 1 least significant bit (LSB b0 connected to positive reference Vrp) and the second residue voltage (Col. 9 lines 62-64) corresponds to -1 LSB (LSB b0 connected to negative reference Vrn) Regarding claim 18. The apparatus of claim 15, Fig. 5 further discloses wherein determining the final calibrated gain (determining 166 and CAL ENGINE) comprises calculating an average (Col. 9 lines 15-17) of the first calibrated gain (Col. 9 lines 59-60) and the second calibrated gain (Col. 9 lines 62-64). Regarding claim 20. Fig. 5 of Li et al discloses a computer-readable medium storing computer executable code for operation of a controller (Co. 14 lines 50-60), comprising code to: obtaining a first calibrated gain (Col. 9 lines 59-60) of a residue amplifier (116) that amplifies a first residue voltage (Col. 9 lines 59-60), which is output from a capacitive digital-to-analog converter (112; see Fig. 2) of a first stage (Col. 9 lines 40-42) of the pipelined ADC (Col. 9 lines 37-38), to a voltage output (first output voltage of 116) corresponding to a first output code (D1) of a second stage (162, 164) of the pipelined ADC (Col. 9 lines 37-38); obtaining a second calibrated gain (Col. 9 lines 62-64) of the residue amplifier (119) that amplifies a second residue voltage (Col. 9 lines 62-64), which is output from the CDAC (DAC 112) of the first stage of the pipelined ADC (Col. 9 lines 40-42), to a voltage (second voltage output of 116 ) corresponding to a second output code (D2) of the second stage (162, 164) of the pipelined ADC (Col. 9 lines 40-42); and determining a final calibrated gain (determining 166 and CAL ENGINE) of the residue amplifier (RGA 116, Col. 1 lines 34-36) based on the first calibrated gain (Col. 9 lines 59-60) and the second calibrated gain (Col. 9 lines 62-64). Allowable Subject Matter 5. Claims 5-14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Prior arts do not teach: amplifying, by the residue amplifier, a third residue voltage output from the CDAC of the first stage of the pipelined ADC using the final calibrated gain to obtain a third amplified residue voltage; determining a third output code of the second stage of the pipelined ADC corresponding to the third amplified residue voltage; amplifying, by the residue amplifier, a fourth residue voltage output from the CDAC of the first stage of the pipelined ADC using the final calibrated gain to obtain a fourth amplified residue voltage; determining a fourth output code of the second stage of the pipelined ADC corresponding to the fourth amplified residue voltage; and determining an offset of the residue amplifier based on the third output code and the fourth output code. 6. Claim 19 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Prior arts do not teach: wherein the at least one processor is further configured to: amplify, by the residue amplifier, a third residue voltage output from the CDAC of the first stage of the pipelined ADC using the final calibrated gain to obtain a third amplified residue voltage; determine a third output code of the second stage of the pipelined ADC corresponding to the third amplified residue voltage; amplify, by the residue amplifier, a fourth residue voltage output from the CDAC of the first stage of the pipelined ADC using the final calibrated gain to obtain a fourth amplified residue voltage; determine a fourth output code of the second stage of the pipelined ADC corresponding to the fourth amplified residue voltage; and determine an offset of the residue amplifier based on the third output code and the fourth output code. Contact Information 7. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Linh Van Nguyen whose telephone number is (571) 272-1810. The examiner can normally be reached from 8:30 – 5:00 Monday-Friday. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mr. Dameon E. Levi can be reached at (571) 272-2105. The fax phone numbers for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned are (571-273-8300) for regular communications and (571-273-8300) for After Final communications. 03/11/2026 /LINH V NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2845
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 30, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640750
DIGITAL-TO-ANALOG CONVERTER CLOCK TRACKING SYSTEMS AND METHODS
3y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640746
ERROR POLARITY DETECTION FOR TIMING SKEW CALIBRATION
2y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12620998
METHODS AND CIRCUITS FOR ELECTRICAL POWER SUPPLY
2y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12620977
DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING A DIGITAL SIGNAL
2y 6m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12597947
DATA COMPRESSION WITH TRUSTWORTHY ENERGY AWARENESS
2y 2m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+2.3%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1186 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month