Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/788,711

ORGANOBORON COMPOUND, ITS PREPARATION AND USE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 30, 2024
Priority
Dec 11, 2023 — provisional 63/608,397
Examiner
KIFLE, BRUCK
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
City University of Hong Kong
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
1369 granted / 1729 resolved
+19.2% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1749
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
§103
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
§102
9.9%
-30.1% vs TC avg
§112
50.5%
+10.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1729 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. i) The claims have not been presented according to proper US practice. Thus, in claim 1, the phrase “An organoboron compound for reductive synthesis comprising” is superfluous, confusing and open-ended. The structural formula and definitions of the variables fully defines the compound. Intended uses do not carry patentability weight and the term “comprises” implies more that what has been positively recited by the compound and definition of the variables. The phrase “A compound of Formula (I)” is suggested. The dependent claims can then follow as The compound of Formula (I) according to claim 1.” ii) The nature of R1 and R2 is not known. The formula requires that both must be present. The term “substitution” without saying which substituents are intended is indefinite. One skilled in the art cannot say which substituents are permitted and which ones are not. Also, R1 and R2 need to be present 1-3 times according to the claims. Thus, a notation, such as, (R1)m and (R2)m, wherein m is 1, 2 or 3” is required to point out that the substituent should be present 1-3 times. iii) The variable “n” is defined as an integer. Applicants need to narrow these to an appropriate range because an integer is infinite. iv) The phrase at the end of the dependent claims that state “and wherein n and X as defined above” should be deleted because the definition of a variable carries over unless there is a narrower definition, the phrase is superfluous, and, “above” is improper here. See claims 2-3, 9. v) In claim 5 is a stable free radical intended? A clarification is required. vi) Claim 8 improperly depends from claim 1 because claim 1 is drawn to a compound and does not have process steps. Appropriate correction is required. vii) Claim 9 lacks essential method steps and reagent to convert the compound of Formula (IV) to the compound of formula (I) according to claim 1. This renders the claims incomplete, therefore, indefinite. See also process claims 10-20 which are incomplete for the same reason. Applicants need to rewrite the process of making claims to have a complete process in the base process claim and narrow subsequent process claims as they need to. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRUCK KIFLE whose telephone number is (571)272-0668. The examiner can normally be reached 8 AM - 6 PM, M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey H. Murray can be reached at 571-272-9023. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. June 12, 2026 /BRUCK KIFLE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1624
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 30, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678505
LEAKAGE INHIBITING AGENT FOR LOCAL INJECTION PREPARATION, LOCAL INJECTION PREPARATION INCLUDING THE SAME, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING LOCAL INJECTION PREPARATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673945
3-((8-((1H-PYRAZOL-4-YL)AMINO)IMIDAZO[1,2-A]PYRIDIN-3-YL)ETHINYL)-N-PHENYLBENZAMIDE DERIVATIVE, METHOD FOR PREPARING SAME, AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION CONTAINING SAME AS ACTIVE INGREDIENT FOR PREVENTION OR TREATMENT OF CANCER
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667834
BIMETALLIC NANOALLOY COMPOSITE
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12661358
PURINE DERIVATIVES AS DRUGS FOR THE TREATMENT OF NEONATAL HYPOXIA-ISCHEMIA BRAIN INJURY AND RELATED DISEASES
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12655088
COMPOUND FOR TREATING ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+15.9%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1729 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month