Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/789,100

INK CONTAINER AND SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 30, 2024
Examiner
RICHMOND, SCOTT A.
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
548 granted / 624 resolved
+19.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
652
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
55.5%
+15.5% vs TC avg
§102
27.3%
-12.7% vs TC avg
§112
13.9%
-26.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 624 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy of Japan Application No. 2023-124419 was received on 23 August 2024 as required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The references cited in the information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 30 July 2024 have been considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings filed on 30 July 2024 are accepted. Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant's cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 5, and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hayashi (US PGPub 2020/0070527 A1). With regard to Claim 1, Hayashi discloses an ink container (Fig. 4, cartridge 30; ¶0003-0004) insertable into an attachment unit (Figs. 1-2; ¶0042-0044), the attachment unit including a contact group (Fig. 2; contacts 132; ¶0077-0079) that has a plurality of contacts aligned in a left-right direction (Fig. 2; contacts 132; ¶0077-0079); a first wall positioned rightward of the contact group (Figs. 3A-3B; ¶0081-0082, right and left walls 138, 139); and a second wall positioned leftward of the contact group (Figs. 3A-3B; ¶0081-0082, right and left walls 138, 139), and the ink container (cartridge 30) comprising: a main body that includes a chamber configured to store ink (Fig. 5; storage chamber 32; housing 31; ¶0094); a supply portion (Fig. 5; cylinder 75; ¶0097) that extends forward from the chamber in a front-rear direction (Figs. 4-5; 51-52 direction) and is configured to supply the ink stored in the chamber to an outside of the main body (¶0097); an electrical interface positioned apart from the supply portion upwardly in an up-down direction orthogonal to the left-right direction and front-rear direction (Figs. 4-5; electrical interface 64; ¶0116-0121); an upper wall that faces upward in the up-down direction and supports the electrical interface (Figs. 5, 6B; top wall 39; ¶0088); and a front wall that faces frontward in the front-rear direction and connected to the upper wall (Fig. 5; front wall 40B; ¶0090; front wall could also be 41), wherein the electrical interface includes an electrode group that has a plurality of electrodes aligned in the left-right direction (¶0118-0120; Figs. 4-6; electrodes 65), the electrode group is electrically connected to the contact group in a state where the ink container is inserted in the attachment unit (Figs. 1-2, 3B, 9-10; ¶0147-0150), and the upper wall (39) has: an upper surface portion (Fig. 4; 39A) that faces the first wall (138/139) and the second wall (138/139) in the state where the ink container is inserted in the attachment unit (Figs. 3A-B; ¶0149 ; and a front end portion (See Fig. 4 below; front end as labeled) that defines an upper end of the front wall (front wall 39; it is noted that the front end portion could also be considered to be the other side of the top of the cartridge 31 with the front end being the top of front wall 41) and a front end of the upper surface portion (See Fig. 4 below) and has a length in the left-right direction (55-56) greater than a length of the electrode group (69) in the left-right direction from a left end to a right end (Fig. 4 see below). PNG media_image1.png 849 614 media_image1.png Greyscale With regard to Claim 5, Hayashi further discloses wherein the chamber (32; Fig. 5) is positioned rearward of a front end of the supply portion (Fig. 5; at least a portion of the chamber 32 is rearward of front end of supply portion 75), and each of the front end portion and the electrical interface is positioned frontward (front wall side being 41A) of the front end of the supply portion (See Fig. 5 below). PNG media_image2.png 598 854 media_image2.png Greyscale With regard to Claim 6, Hayashi discloses a system (¶0002) comprising: an attachment unit that has an insertion space; and an ink container insertable into the insertion space, wherein the attachment unit includes a contact group that has a plurality of contacts aligned in a left-right direction, a first wall positioned rightward of the contact group, and a second wall positioned leftward of the contact group, the ink container includes: a main body that includes a chamber configured to store ink; a supply portion that extends forward from the chamber in a front-rear direction and is configured to supply the ink stored in the chamber to an outside of the main body; an electrical interface positioned apart from the supply portion upwardly in an up-down direction orthogonal to the left-right direction and front-rear direction; an upper wall that faces upward in the up-down direction and supports the electrical interface; and a front wall that faces frontward in the front-rear direction and connected to the upper wall, the electrical interface includes an electrode group that has a plurality of electrodes aligned in the left-right direction, the electrode group is electrically connected to the contact group in a state where the ink container is inserted in the attachment unit, and the upper wall has: an upper surface portion that faces the first wall and the second wall in the state where the ink container is inserted in the attachment unit; and a front end portion that defines an upper end of the front wall and a front end of the upper surface portion and has a length in the left-right direction greater than a length of the electrode group in the left-right direction from a left end to a right end. The above limitations are rejected under the same reasoning/rationale as claim 1 above. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim 2-3 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hayashi, in view of Miyao et al. (US PGPub 2019/0299628 A1), hereinafter Miyao. With regard to Claim 2, Hayashi does not explicitly disclose wherein the front end portion has an inclined surface adjacent to the front end of the upper surface portion, and inclined, with respect to the upper surface portion, so as to extend downward toward a front. The secondary reference of Miyao discloses wherein the front end portion (front end 41; Fig. 6) has an inclined surface (155 and 92) adjacent to the front end of the upper surface portion (See Fig. 6 below), and inclined, with respect to the upper surface portion (See Fig. 6 below), so as to extend downward toward a front (See Fig. 6 below). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the inclined surface of Miyao, with the container of Hayashi, in order to provide a configuration that can have desired dimensions and not require a smaller circuit board substrate, as taught by Miyao (¶0006-0008). PNG media_image3.png 532 539 media_image3.png Greyscale With regard to Claim 3, Hayashi does not explicitly disclose wherein the upper wall includes a recess positioned rearward of the front end portion and frontward of the electrical interface, and recessed downwardly from the upper surface portion. The secondary reference of Miyao discloses wherein the upper wall (39) includes a recess (¶0112, recess at end face 151) positioned rearward of the front end portion (See Fig. 6 above) and frontward of the electrical interface (See Fig. 6 above; electrical interface 64), and recessed downwardly from the upper surface portion (See Fig. 6 above). With regard to Claim 7, Hayashi does not explicitly disclose wherein the upper wall includes a recess positioned between the front end portion and the electrical interface and recessed downwardly from the upper surface portion, the attachment unit includes a third wall positioned upward of the recess in the state where the ink container is inserted in the attachment unit. The secondary reference of Miyao discloses wherein the upper wall (See Fig. 6 below, top wall 39of cartridge) includes a recess (¶0112, recess at rear end face 151) positioned between the front end portion (41) and the electrical interface (64) and recessed downwardly from the upper surface portion (See Fig. 6 below), the attachment unit includes a third wall (Figs. 7-8; top wall 58 of cartridge holder 101; ¶0050) positioned upward of the recess in the state where the ink container is inserted in the attachment unit (Figs. 7-8; top wall 58 of cartridge holder 101; ¶0050). PNG media_image4.png 531 566 media_image4.png Greyscale Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hayashi, in view of Miyao, and further in view of Takahashi et al. (US PGPub 2018/0093485 A1), hereinafter Takahashi. With regard to Claim 4, Hayashi-Miyao does not explicitly disclose a first protrusion that is positioned rightward of the recess and protrudes upward of the upper surface portion; and a second protrusion that is positioned leftward of the recess and protrudes upward of the upper surface portion. The tertiary reference of Takahashi discloses disclose a first protrusion (See Fig. 3A below) that is positioned rightward of the recess (See Fig. 3A below) and protrudes upward of the upper surface portion (See Fig. 3A below); and a second protrusion (See Fig. 3A below) that is positioned leftward of the recess (See Fig. 3A below) and protrudes upward of the upper surface portion (See Fig. 3A below; under the broadest reasonable interpretation, the upper surface 39 includes the recess, thus the protrusions extend upward of the upper surface portion, as there are different levels in the upper surface portion). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the protrusions of Takahashi, with the combination of Hayashi-Miyao, in order to provide a liquid cartridge that can improve a degree of freedom in arrangement of members for achieving functions of the liquid cartridge, as taught by Takahashi (¶0006). PNG media_image5.png 464 485 media_image5.png Greyscale Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SCOTT A. RICHMOND whose telephone number is (313)446-6547. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 9-6:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Douglas Rodriguez can be reached on 571-431-0716. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see https://ppair-my.uspto.gov/pair/PrivatePair. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SCOTT A RICHMOND/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 30, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600151
CUTTER AND METHOD OF SEPARATION FOR SHEETS PRINTED FROM A CONTINUOUS WEB SUSCEPTIBLE OF LONGITUDINAL DIVISIONS AND RELATIVE WEB
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594773
INKJET PRINTING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594765
PRINTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589600
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PRINTING ON TILTED PRINT MEDIUM USING PRINTHEAD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589603
PRINTING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+5.9%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 624 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month