Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/789,323

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMIC MULTICARRIER ALLOCATION TO NB-IoT DEVICES

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Jul 30, 2024
Priority
Mar 26, 2021 — IN 202121013485 +1 more
Examiner
RENNER, BRANDON M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Jio Platforms Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
767 granted / 944 resolved
+21.3% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
47 currently pending
Career history
1001
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
81.4%
+41.4% vs TC avg
§102
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
§112
7.3%
-32.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 944 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 15-34 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-14 of U.S. Patent No. 12075393. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claims of patent 12075393 anticipate the limitations of the instant application as shown in the table below. Claim 15 of the instant application Claim 1 of patent 12075393 A device for resource allocation in a communication system, comprising: a memory storing instructions; a processor configured to execute the instructions to cause the resource allocation device to: receive Physical Resource Block (PRB) utilization data corresponding to at least one of at least one-time slot or a set of data packets, upon requesting for the PRB utilization data via a base station, the PRB utilization data including at least one PRB utilization duration; compare the at least one PRB utilization duration included in the received PRB utilization data with a threshold PRB utilization duration; transmit, a request for a Negative Acknowledgement (NACK) percentage report corresponding to at least one of an Absolute Radio Frequency Channel Number (ARFCN) or a PRB associated with at least one non-anchor carrier, in response to a determination that the at least one PRB utilization duration is less than the threshold PRB utilization duration; select at least one of the ARFCN or the PRB associated with the at least one non-anchor carrier for the at least one of at least one-time slot or the set of data packets, based on the PRB utilization data, the NACK percentage report and a pre-defined value for at least one of the ARFCN or the PRB; transmit, to the base station, a notification indicating a representative of utilization of at least one of the ARFCN or the PRB associated with at least one non-anchor carrier; and allocate at least one of the ARFCN or the PRB associated with at least one non-anchor carrier to schedule one or more Narrow Band Internet of Things (NB-IoT) enabled devices for data transfer corresponding to the selected time slot. A resource allocation system for dynamic multicarrier allocation to Narrow Band-Internet of Things (NB-IoT) enabled devices comprising: a processor; and a memory communicatively coupled to the processor, wherein the memory stores the processor instructions, which on execution, the processor causes the resource allocation system to: receive from a Performance Management System (PMS) communicatively coupled to a Long-Term Evolution evolved Node B (LTE eNB), Physical Resource Block (PRB) utilization data corresponding to at least one of at least one-time slot and a set of data packets, upon requesting for the PRB utilization data via the LTE eNB; compare at least one PRB utilization duration in the received PRB utilization data with a pre-defined threshold PRB utilization duration; request via a Narrow Band Internet of Things evolved Node B (NB-IoT eNB), a cumulative Negative Acknowledgement (NACK) percentage report corresponding to at least one of an Absolute Radio Frequency Channel Number (ARFCN) or a PRB associated with at least one non-anchor carrier, if the at least one PRB utilization duration is less than the pre-defined threshold PRB utilization duration; select at least one of the ARFCN or the PRB associated with at least one non-anchor carrier for at least one of at least one-time slot and a set of data packets, based on the PRB utilization data, the cumulative NACK percentage report and a pre-defined value for at least one of the ARFCN or the PRB; establish a connection between a plurality of NB-IoT enabled devices and the NB-IoT eNB (106), upon transmitting via the LTE eNB, information associated with the selected at least one of the ARFCN or the PRB for at least one of the at least one-time slot and a set of data packets to the NB-IoT eNB; notify to the LTE eNB, representative of utilization of at least one of the ARFCN or the PRB as the non-anchor carrier; and allocate at least one of the ARFCN or the PRB as a non-anchor carrier to schedule the plurality of NB-IoT enabled devices for data transfer corresponding to the selected time slot, when an Acknowledgement (ACK) is received from the LTE eNB in response to the notification Appropriate correction required. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRANDON M RENNER whose telephone number is (571)270-3621. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7am-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Derrick Ferris can be reached at (571)-272-3123. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRANDON M RENNER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2411
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 30, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676711
NETWORK DEVICES, TERMINAL DEVICES, AND METHODS THEREIN
2y 12m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12672003
METHODS, DEVICES AND SYSTEM FOR LAWFUL INTERCEPTION BY SUBSCRIBING TO A NOTIFICATION
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12640810
DYNAMIC SCANNING RATES FOR SATELLITE NETWORK COVERAGE
2y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640846
METHODS AND DEVICES FOR JOINT CODING AND DETERMINING IN-EFFECT REFERENCE SIGNAL RESOURCES
2y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12628164
SIDELINK TRANSMISSIONS USING SLOT AGGREGATION
3y 11m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.0%)
3y 1m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 944 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month