Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 26, 2026
Application No. 18/789,739

COLORED ELECTROPHORETIC DISPLAYS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 31, 2024
Priority
Sep 10, 2014 — provisional 62/048,591 +6 more
Examiner
THOMAS, BRANDI N
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
E Ink Holdings Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
923 granted / 1117 resolved
+22.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1138
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
57.7%
+17.7% vs TC avg
§102
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
§112
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1117 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 10-11 in the reply filed on 8/3/2026 is acknowledged. Response to Amendment This Office action is in response to the communication filed 8/3/2026. The Cancellation of Claims 1- 9, filed 8/3/2026, are acknowledged and accepted. Information Disclosure Statement Acknowledgement is made of receipt of Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO-1449) filed 9/18/2024. An initialed copy is attached to this Office Action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. In claim 10, lines 8 and 9 disclose the phrase “radical initiator” which is not present in the specification. Claim 11 is dependent from claim 10 and is allowable for the reasons given above. Reasons for Allowance Allowable Subject Matter Claims 10-11 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The prior art of record fails to teach or fairly suggest to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention, in conjunction with all the other claimed limitation, a method of making a functionalized cyan pigment particle having all the claimed features of applicant's instant invention, specifically including: providing monomethacrylate- terminated poly(dimethylsiloxane); dispersing the copper phthalocyanine pigment core, monomethacrylate-terminated poly(dimethylsiloxane), and methyl methacrylate monomers in a nonpolar solvent to make a dispersion; providing a radical initiator to the dispersion; heating and stirring the dispersion including the radical initiator; and separating a copper phthalocyanine pigment core coated with methacrylate- terminated poly(dimethylsiloxane) from the dispersion, as set forth in the claims. テルファー, スティ(JP2017526980), hereinafter ‘980, discloses an electrophoretic medium has a fluid, first light-scattering white particles, and subtractive three primary colors which are magenta, cyan, and yellow, a second Particles, third particles, and fourth particles, and at least two of these colored particles are non-light scattering. The cyan particle is a copper phthalocyanine material that is coated by dispersion polymerization and incorporates methyl methacrylate. ‘980 is silent to providing monomethacrylate- terminated poly(dimethylsiloxane) and heating and stirring the dispersion including the radical initiator. 川守田 正雄 (JP4617528), hereinafter ‘528, discloses a method for producing a copper phthalocyanine pigment composition, wherein the copper phthalocyanine crude is obtained by reacting phthalic anhydride or a derivative thereof with urea or a derivative thereof and a copper compound, or reacting a phthalodinitrile with a copper compound. It is obtained by washing the unpurified copper phthalocyanine immediately after synthesis. ‘528 is also silent to providing monomethacrylate- terminated poly(dimethylsiloxane) and heating and stirring the dispersion including the radical initiator. Claim 11 is dependent from claim 1 and is allowable for the reasons given above. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRANDI N THOMAS whose telephone number is (571)272-2341. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7:30 - 3:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephone Allen can be reached at 571-272-2434. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRANDI N THOMAS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 31, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12740698
PREDICTING CLINICAL PARAMETERS RELATING TO GLAUCOMA FROM CENTRAL VISUAL FIELD PATTERNS
4y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12730300
SPATIALLY VARIABLE HYDROPHOBIC LAYERS FOR DIGITAL MICROFLUIDICS
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12730352
OPTICAL SWITCH AND SWITCHING METHOD
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12724313
ARBITRARILY TAILORABLE ELECTROCHROMIC DEVICE AND USE THEREOF
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12721518
EYE SCOPES
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+7.8%)
2y 10m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1117 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month