Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/789,804

Body-Worn Storage Tray Device

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 31, 2024
Examiner
SKURDAL, COREY NELSON
Art Unit
3734
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allow Rate
729 granted / 1189 resolved
-8.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1220
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
38.7%
-1.3% vs TC avg
§102
35.9%
-4.1% vs TC avg
§112
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1189 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3, 6, 8-12, 15, 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hansen (US 7,784,658) in view of Green (US 3,212,690). Regarding claims 1-3, 6, 8-12, 15, 17-18, Hansen discloses a body-worn storage tray device 10 comprising: a rectangular body 11 comprised of an interior space; a fastener 60 positioned on an exterior surface of the body, fastener 60 being considered a “hook” to the degree claimed; and a belt 75 that attaches to the body, wherein the body is comprised of an opening 30/38 positioned on a rear surface of the body. Hansen does not disclose the belt having a closure. Green teaches a belt 12 to attach a utility belt to a user, the belt comprised of a closure 20 that acts as a clamp/double ring. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to provide a similar closure on the belt of Hansen in order to secure the ends of the belt around the user. Regarding claims 19-20, the method steps as claimed would be satisfied in the normal operation of the modified Hansen device as applied to claims 1-3, 8-9, 10-12, and 17-18 above. Furthermore, see Hansen col. 4 lines 6-18 disclosing the specific method steps of attaching the belt, placing items into the interior space and attaching a tool to the fastener. Claim(s) 4-5 and 13-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hansen in view of Green, as applied to claims 3 and 12 above, and further in view of Lessmann (US 2007/0205234). Regarding claims 4-5 and 13-14, modified Hansen discloses the invention substantially as claimed but does not disclose padding on the rear surface of the body. Lessmann teaches that it is known to provide foam padding 30 on the rear side 16 of a body worn carrier 12 – see paragraph 23. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to provide foam padding on the rear surface of the Hansen device in order to make it more comfortable when worn. Claim(s) 7 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hansen in view of Green, as applied to claims 1 and 10 above, and further in view of Woolery (US 2009/0095785). Regarding claims 7 and 16, modified Hansen discloses the invention substantially as claimed but does not disclose the fastener being a magnet, clip or tie. Woolery teaches that it is well known to provide a tool accessory belt 110 with magnets 130’ on various exterior surfaces of the device to carry different accessories thereon. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to provide similar magnet members on the exterior or the Hansen body to allow additional tools/accessories to be carried by the user. In doing so, a magnet fastener would be defined as claimed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to COREY NELSON SKURDAL whose telephone number is (571)272-9588. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9am-4pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Newhouse can be reached at 571-272-4544. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /COREY N SKURDAL/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3734
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 31, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600424
CONVERTIBLE CARGO HOLDER AND BICYCLE SEAT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12584711
UNIVERSAL MOUNT SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TACTICAL ACCESSORIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12571609
QUICK RELEASE HOLSTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12570218
TRACK ASSEMBLY WITH STORAGE BIN
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12545344
Reconfigurable Arm for a Bicycle Rack
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+11.4%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1189 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month