Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/790,106

RIBBON CARTRIDGE AUTOMATIC CENTERING SYSTEM AND METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 31, 2024
Examiner
RIVERA, WILLIAM ARAUZ
Art Unit
3654
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Brady Worldwide Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
957 granted / 1281 resolved
+22.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
1303
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
64.2%
+24.2% vs TC avg
§102
17.9%
-22.1% vs TC avg
§112
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1281 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4 and 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Christensen et al (U.S. Patent No. 6,425,548), hereinafter “Christensen”. With respect to Claim 1, Christensen, Figures 1-5, teaches a system for installing ribbon material in a printer, comprising: a spindle 10 provided in the form of a spindle arm 30,50 and a key 54 associated with the spindle arm 30,50; and a ribbon cartridge 100 having a keyway 112 arranged to align with the key 54 of the spindle arm 30,50 and a ribbon roll including a supply of ribbon material (See Column 1, lines 14-16), wherein engagement between the key 54 and the keyway 112 positions the ribbon cartridge on the spindle arm 30,50 in a correct orientation. With respect to Claim 2, Christensen further teaches wherein engagement between the key 54 and the keyway 112 centers the ribbon cartridge with respect to the spindle arm 30,50. With respect to Claim 3, Christensen further teaches wherein the ribbon material is imparted with one of a first width or a second width, wherein the first width is less than the second width. With respect to Claim 4, Christensen further teaches wherein engagement between the key and the keyway centers the ribbon cartridge with respect to the printer. With respect to Claim 6, Christensen further teaches the ribbon cartridge having a first end and a second end opposing the first end, wherein the keyway is positioned at the first end and the first end must be installed on the spindle before the second end in order for the keyway to engage the key and position the ribbon cartridge in the correct orientation. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 7 and 18-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Christensen as applied to Claims 1-4 and 6 above, and further in view of Riegner, III et al (U.S. Patent No. 9,038,937), hereinafter “Riegner”. With respect to Claim 7, Christensen is advanced above. Christensen further teaches the ribbon cartridge further comprising a support member 102 but does not teach an end cap releasably couplable to the support member. However, Riegner, Figures 1-3, teaches and end cap 24. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide Christensen with an end cap, as taught by Riegner, for the purpose of maintaining the ribbon confined on the support. With respect to Claim 18, Christensen, Figures 1-5, teaches a method of installing a ribbon cartridge on a spindle of a printer, comprising the steps of: providing a ribbon cartridge comprising: a support element positioned at a first end of the ribbon cartridge, the support element including a first opening and a keyway having an end wall; and aligning the ribbon cartridge with the spindle such that the first end of the ribbon cartridge is positioned adjacent to the spindle; mounting the ribbon cartridge onto the spindle such that the spindle extends through the first opening before extending through the second opening; and moving the ribbon cartridge along the spindle until the end wall of the keyway is engaged by a key positioned on the spindle. Christensen does not teach an end cap positioned at a second end of the ribbon cartridge opposing the first end, the end cap having a second opening. However, Riegner, Figures 1-3, teaches and end cap 24. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide Christensen with an end cap, as taught by Riegner, for the purpose of maintaining the ribbon confined on the support. With respect to Claim 19, Christensen further teaches wherein providing a ribbon cartridge, further comprises the steps of: providing a ribbon cartridge having a first width at a first time; and providing a ribbon cartridge having a second width at a second time, wherein the first width is different than the second width, and wherein the first time is different from the second time. With respect to Claim 20, Christensen further teaches wherein engagement between the end wall of the keyway and the key centers the ribbon cartridge with respect to the spindle. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5 and 8-9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Claim 5 is allowable over the prior art of record because the prior art of record does not teach or suggest the entire combination of elements of the system set forth including wherein the supply of ribbon material is wound about a core of the ribbon roll, the spindle further comprising one or more leaf springs for inhibiting the ribbon roll from moving out of alignment with respect to the spindle arm during operation of the printer. None of the references of the prior art teach or suggest wherein the supply of ribbon material is wound about a core of the ribbon roll, the spindle further comprising one or more leaf springs for inhibiting the ribbon roll from moving out of alignment with respect to the spindle arm during operation of the printer as advanced above and such do not provide the necessary motivation, absent applicant's specification, for modifying the system in the manner required by the claims. Claim 8 is allowable over the prior art of record because the prior art of record does not teach or suggest the entire combination of elements of the system set forth including a transmission member, and the ribbon cartridge further comprising a smart cell capable of transmitting an electrical signal to the printer via the transmission member, wherein the printer detects whether the ribbon cartridge is intended for use with the spindle based on the electrical signal transmitted by the smart cell. None of the references of the prior art teach or suggest a transmission member, and the ribbon cartridge further comprising a smart cell capable of transmitting an electrical signal to the printer via the transmission member, wherein the printer detects whether the ribbon cartridge is intended for use with the spindle based on the electrical signal transmitted by the smart cell as advanced above and such do not provide the necessary motivation, absent applicant's specification, for modifying the system in the manner required by the claims. Claim 9 is allowable over the prior art of record because the prior art of record does not teach or suggest the entire combination of elements of the system set forth including one or more fail-safe features and the ribbon cartridge further comprising one or more fail-safe members, wherein the fail-safe members are configured to engage the fail-safe features and inhibit installation of the ribbon cartridge with an incorrect orientation relative to the spindle. None of the references of the prior art teach or suggest one or more fail-safe features and the ribbon cartridge further comprising one or more fail-safe members, wherein the fail-safe members are configured to engage the fail-safe features and inhibit installation of the ribbon cartridge with an incorrect orientation relative to the spindle as advanced above and such do not provide the necessary motivation, absent applicant's specification, for modifying the system in the manner required by the claims. Claims 10-17 are allowed. Claims 10-17 are allowable over the prior art of record because the prior art of record does not teach or suggest the entire combination of elements of the ribbon cartridge set forth including a ribbon cartridge for installation on a spindle of a printer, comprising: a supply of ribbon material; and a ribbon holder for holding the supply of ribbon material, the ribbon holder including: a support member having a flange, a first opening extending through the flange, and a first fail-safe member disposed about the first opening; and an end cap releasably couplable to the support member, the end cap including a second opening extending therethrough and a second fail-safe member disposed about the second opening, wherein the first fail-safe member and the second fail-safe member are configured to engage at least a portion of the spindle when the ribbon cartridge is being installed in an incorrect orientation, and wherein engagement between the spindle and the first fail-safe member or the second fail-safe member inhibits movement of the ribbon cartridge along the spindle. None of the references of the prior art teach or suggest a ribbon cartridge for installation on a spindle of a printer, comprising: a supply of ribbon material; and a ribbon holder for holding the supply of ribbon material, the ribbon holder including: a support member having a flange, a first opening extending through the flange, and a first fail-safe member disposed about the first opening; and an end cap releasably couplable to the support member, the end cap including a second opening extending therethrough and a second fail-safe member disposed about the second opening, wherein the first fail-safe member and the second fail-safe member are configured to engage at least a portion of the spindle when the ribbon cartridge is being installed in an incorrect orientation, and wherein engagement between the spindle and the first fail-safe member or the second fail-safe member inhibits movement of the ribbon cartridge along the spindle as advanced above and such do not provide the necessary motivation, absent applicant's specification, for modifying the ribbon cartridge in the manner required by the claims. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WILLIAM ARAUZ RIVERA whose telephone number is (571)272-6953. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 9:00 AM to 8:00 PM MDT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Victoria P. Augustine can be reached at 313-446-4858. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WILLIAM A. RIVERA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3654
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 31, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12635834
DUST COLLECTOR.
2y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12616317
AUTOMATIC WEBBING WINDING DEVICE AND BEDSIDE BED HAVING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12612291
MAGNETIC-ATTRACTION ROPE-GUIDE PROTECTIVE SHELL, ROPE GUIDE ASSEMBLY, AND VEHICLE
2y 0m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12611073
DISPENSING ASSEMBLY FOR PAPER PRODUCTS
1y 8m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12606410
LOW TENSION APPLICATION COILER
2y 7m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+8.8%)
2y 7m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1281 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month