Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/790,311

CUSHION, MANUFACTURING APPARATUS, AND A METHOD OF MANUFACTURE

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Jul 31, 2024
Priority
Oct 17, 2023 — provisional 63/590,981
Examiner
HUSON, MONICA ANNE
Art Unit
1742
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Lear Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
1101 granted / 1383 resolved
+14.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
1414
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
45.5%
+5.5% vs TC avg
§102
20.0%
-20.0% vs TC avg
§112
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1383 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, and 21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Lober (U.S. Patent 2,676,733). Regarding Claim 1, Lober shows an apparatus (Title) comprising a funnel comprising a set of sides that cooperate to define an inlet opening and an outlet opening (Figure 2, element 15+25, element 16+19), and an actuator that is operatively connected to the funnel, wherein at least one member of the set of sides is independently vibratable with respect to at least one other member of the set of sides by the actuator (Figure 2, element 18; Column 2, lines 5-30). Regarding Claim 2, Lober shows the apparatus of claim 1 above, including one wherein a plurality of members of the set of sides are fixed relative to each other and are vibratable together by the actuator independently of at least one other member of the set of sides (elements 19+26 versus elements 15+25). Regarding Claim 3, Lober shows the apparatus of claim 1 above, including one further comprising a sheet that is disposed on at least one member of the set of sides and that faces toward the inlet opening, wherein the sheet is vibratable with the at least one member of the set of sides (Figure 2, element 19). Regarding Claim 21, Lober shows the apparatus of claim 1 above, including one wherein the actuator is configured to vibrate the at least one member of the set of sides along a plurality of axes, and wherein the one or more axes are perpendicular to each other (Figure 2, elements 18, 22, 23). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 5-7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lober. Regarding Claim 5, Lober shows the apparatus of claim 1 above, but he does not show movable funnel sides. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to make the sides of Lober’s funnel movable in order to facilitate size adjustment of the funnel and because adjustability is not held to be a patentable advance (MPEP 2144.04 (V)(D)). Regarding Claim 6, Lober shows the apparatus of claim 1 above, but he does not show a second actuator. It would have been obvious to include a second actuator for vibration in order to increase or localize the vibration availability and because duplication of parts has not patentable significance unless a new and unexpected result is produced (MPEP 2144.04 (VI)(B)). Regarding Claim 7, Lober shows the apparatus of claim 6 above, but he does not show movable funnel sides. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to make the sides of Lober’s funnel movable in order to facilitate size adjustment of the funnel and because adjustability is not held to be a patentable advance (MPEP 2144.04 (V)(D)). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-3, 5-7, and 21 have been considered but are moot because the claims were amended such that further consideration and search was required. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MONICA HUSON whose telephone number is (571)272-1198. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8a-4p. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christina Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1176. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MONICA ANNE HUSON Primary Examiner Art Unit 1742 /MONICA A HUSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1742
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 31, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 14, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jun 16, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12742108
THERMALLY CONDUCTIVE SILICONE COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING GAP FILLER USING SAID COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741404
Curved Plastic Panel And Method And Device For Processing The Same
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735551
PROCESS FOR PRODUCING BAS(2-HYDROXYETHYL) TEREPHTHALATE IN LIQUID FORM BY DEPOLYMERIZATION OF POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE (PET)
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734750
UV CURING APPARATUS WITH LIGHT GUIDE AND IN-PROCESS RADIOMETRY
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12728583
SYSTEM AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING FIBER BASED ARTICLES WITH STEAM MOLDING
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+13.5%)
2y 11m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1383 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month