Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/790,311

CUSHION, MANUFACTURING APPARATUS, AND A METHOD OF MANUFACTURE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 31, 2024
Priority
Oct 17, 2023 — provisional 63/590,981
Examiner
HUSON, MONICA ANNE
Art Unit
1742
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Lear Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
1084 granted / 1364 resolved
+14.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 12m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
1401
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
63.5%
+23.5% vs TC avg
§102
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§112
12.9%
-27.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1364 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 8-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected inventions, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 13 February 2026. Applicant's election with traverse of Claims 1-7 in the reply filed on 13 February 2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that the Groups II and III are not patentably distinct inventions. This is not found persuasive because the apparatus as claimed can be used to practice another and materially different process, such as one that does not require the step of extruding and/or shaping a subset of filaments with a non-planar profile. Further, the article as claimed can be made by another and materially different apparatus, such as one that does not require a funnel. Finally, the article as claimed can be made by another and materially different process, such as one that does not require the step of extrusion. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Glassen (U.S. Patent 2,593,665). Regarding Claim 1, Glassen shows an apparatus (Figure 1) comprising a funnel comprising a set of sides that cooperate to define an inlet opening and an outlet opening (element 26), and an actuator that is operatively connected to the funnel, wherein at least one member of the set of sides is vibratable by the actuator (Column 5, lines 66-75; Column 6, lines 1-19; Column 7, lines 30-39). Regarding Claim 2, Glassen shows the apparatus of claim 1 above, including one wherein the set of sides are fixedly positioned with respect to each other and the set of sides are vibratable by the actuator (Column 3, lines 68-75; Column 4, lines 1-9). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Glassen, in view of Whitten (U.S. Patent 5,971,690). Glassen shows the apparatus of claim 1 above, but he does not show a sheet that is disposed on the funnel sides. Whitten shows a funnel which comprises a sheet (liner) that is disposed on at least one member of the set of sides and that faces toward the inlet opening (element 25). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to use Whitten’s liner in Glassen’s vibratable funnel in order to prevent damage to the funnel itself. Claim(s) 4-7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Glassen. Regarding Claims 4-5, Glassen shows the apparatus of claim 1 above, but he does not show movable funnel sides. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to make the sides of Glassen’s funnel movable in order to facilitate size adjustment of the funnel and because adjustability is not held to be a patentable advance (MPEP 2144.04 (V)(D)). Regarding Claim 6, Glassen shows the apparatus of claim 1 above, but he does not show a second actuator. It would have been obvious to include a second actuator for vibration in order to increase or localize the vibration availability and because duplication of parts has not patentable significance unless a new and unexpected result is produced (MPEP 2144.04 (VI)(B)). Regarding Claim 7, Glassen shows the apparatus of claim 6 above, but he does not show movable funnel sides. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to make the sides of Glassen’s funnel movable in order to facilitate size adjustment of the funnel and because adjustability is not held to be a patentable advance (MPEP 2144.04 (V)(D)). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MONICA HUSON whose telephone number is (571)272-1198. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8a-4p. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christina Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1176. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MONICA ANNE HUSON Primary Examiner Art Unit 1742 /MONICA A HUSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1742
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 31, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 14, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12622484
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FORMING A MOLDED COMPONENT WITH AN INSERT
2y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12627205
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING ROTOR
2y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12623403
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANIPULATING CURING RADIATION IN THREE-DIMENSIONAL PRINTING
11m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12616564
BRANCH ENDOPROSTHETIC SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHOD
3y 9m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12617140
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR FORMING PLASTIC PREFORMS INTO PLASTIC CONTAINERS WITH CLEAN ROOM
2y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+13.6%)
2y 12m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1364 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month