Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/790,509

ROTATING STRAP CONNECTOR AND REMOVABLE HANDLE FOR EXERCISE EQUIPMENT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 31, 2024
Examiner
JALALZADEH ABYANE, SHILA
Art Unit
3784
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Jfxd Trx Acq LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
50%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 50% of resolved cases
50%
Career Allow Rate
286 granted / 571 resolved
-19.9% vs TC avg
Strong +48% interview lift
Without
With
+48.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
612
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§103
41.0%
+1.0% vs TC avg
§102
21.2%
-18.8% vs TC avg
§112
28.5%
-11.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 571 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I (Claims 1-12) in the reply filed on 02/02/2026 is acknowledged. As such, Claims 13-20 have been withdrawn from consideration for being directed towards the non-elected Group II. Claims 1-12 have been examined as set forth below. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: the phrase “a second position in the first portion” in line 7, needs to be changed to “a second position in which the first portion”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1-3, 5 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Roberts (US 5,556,369). Regarding claim 1, Roberts teaches a strap assembly configured for use during exercise comprises: an inelastic elongated strap member (i.e., 16A with 26A, Fig. 2) that includes a grip (i.e., 40A) positioned at a first end (Fig. 2); and a rotating connector (i.e., 22A) positioned along the strap member between the first end and a second end (Fig. 2), the rotating connector configured to allow operation of the strap assembly in a first position in which a first portion of the strap (i.e., 26A) located between the first end and the rotating connector (Fig. 2) is aligned with a second portion of the strap (i.e., 16A) located between the rotating connector and the second end (Fig. 2), and in a second position in which the first portion of the strap (i.e., 26A) is longitudinally rotated relative to the second portion of the strap (i.e., 16A, Figs. 2, 10-11 and 14, col. 3 lines 44-54, as shown in Fig. 2, the rotating connector (i.e., 22A) is a double-gated, swivel ring element (that includes two rings, an upper ring and a lower ring, that are rotatably connected to each other with a pin in the middle. The pin enables the lower ring to rotate 360 degrees relative to the upper ring and vice versa). The double-gated, swivel ring element is rotatably connecting the first portion of the strap (i.e., 26A) to the second portion of the strap (i.e., 16A). The double-gated, swivel ring element as the connector enables operation of the strap assembly in a first position in which a first portion of the strap is aligned with the second portion of the strap (see Fig. 2), and in a second position in which the first portion of the strap (i.e., 26A) is longitudinally rotated (via rotation of the lower ring of the swivel element relative to the upper ring of the swivel element about the pin)). Regarding claim 2, Roberts teaches wherein the first portion of the strap (i.e., 26A) is connected to a first coupler (i.e., the lower ring of 22A) of the rotating connector (as shown below) and the second portion of the strap (i.e., 16A) is connected to a second coupler (i.e., the upper ring of 22A) of the rotating connector (as shown below, please note that an enlarged portion of Fig. 2 has been shown below for clarification). [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (Second bar)][AltContent: textbox (First bar)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (First coupler)][AltContent: textbox (Second coupler)] PNG media_image1.png 560 834 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 3, Roberts teaches wherein the first portion of the strap is wrapped around a first bar (as shown in the enlarged portion of Fig. 2 above) of the first coupler and the second portion of the strap is wrapped around a second bar of the second coupler (as shown in the enlarged portion of Fig. 2 above). Regarding claim 5, Roberts teaches wherein the rotating connector (i.e., 22A) comprises a first coupler (as shown in the enlarged portion of Fig. 2 above) and a second coupler (as shown in the enlarged portion of Fig. 2 above) configured to rotate relative to each other, the first coupler and the second coupler connected to each other via a pin (Fig. 2, col. 3 lines 44-54, as shown in Fig. 2, the rotating connector (i.e., 22A) is a double-gated, swivel ring element. A double-gated swivel ring element inherently includes a pin between two rings, an upper ring and a lower ring to enable for swiveling of connecting parts relative to each other. In this case, the double-gated swivel ring element (i.e., 22A) includes a lower ring (first coupler) and an upper ring (second coupler), rotatably connected to each other via a pin and rotate/swivel relative to each other). Regarding claim 10, Roberts teaches the strap assembly further comprising: a second inelastic elongated strap member (i.e., 18A with 28A, Fig. 2) that includes a second grip (i.e., 42A) positioned at a first end of the second inelastic elongated strap (Fig. 2); and a second rotating connector (i.e., 24A) positioned along the second strap member between the first end and a second end (Fig. 2), the second rotating connector configured to allow operation of the strap assembly in a first position in which a first portion of the second strap (i.e. 28A) located between the first end and the rotating connector is aligned with a second portion of the second strap (i.e., 18A) located between the second rotating connector (i.e., 24A) and the second end (Fig. 2), and in a second position in the first portion of the second strap (i.e., 28A) is longitudinally rotated relative to the second portion of the second strap (i.e., 18A, Figs. 2, 10-11 and 14, col. 3 lines 44-54, as shown in Fig. 2, the rotating connector (i.e., 24A) is a double-gated, swivel ring element (that includes two rings, an upper ring and a lower ring, that are rotatably connected to each other with a pin in the middle. The pin enables the lower ring to rotate 360 degrees relative to the upper ring and vice versa). The double-gated, swivel ring element (i.e., 24A) is rotatably connecting the first portion of the second strap (i.e., 28A) to the second portion of the second strap (i.e., 18A). The double-gated, swivel ring element as the connector enables operation of the strap assembly in a first position in which a first portion of the second strap is aligned with the second portion of the second strap (see Fig. 2), and in a second position in which the first portion of the second strap (i.e., 28A) is longitudinally rotated (via rotation of the lower ring of the swivel element relative to the upper ring of the swivel element about the pin)). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Feigenbaum et al. (US 2007/0173383 A1) in view of Jeune (US 2023/0377541 A1). Regarding claim 1, Feigenbaum teaches a strap assembly configured for use during exercise comprises: an inelastic elongated strap member (10 along with 40 and 22 in Fig. 2 is considered an inelastic elongated strap member), that includes a grip (24) positioned at a first end (Fig. 2); and a connector (i.e. 28/32) positioned along the strap member between the first end and a second end (Fig. 2), the connector configured to allow operation of the strap assembly in a first position in which a first portion of the strap (22) located between the first end and the connector is aligned with a second portion of the strap (10) located between the connector and the second end (Fig. 2). Feigenbaum is silent about the connector being a rotating connector and in addition to the first position, the rotating connector allowing operation of the strap assembly in a second position in the first portion of the strap is longitudinally rotated relative to the second portion of the strap. Regarding claim 1, Jeune, in an analogous art (see the Note below for details) teaches an inelastic elongated strap (12B with 26 and with/without 14 in Figs. 1-2, is considered an elastic elongated strap) having a first end (towards the neck of the instrument in Fig. 1), a rotating connector (combination of 16, 16A, 18, 20, 20A, 22 and 24 as shown in Figs. 2-3) positioned along the strap member between the first end (towards the neck of instrument in Fig. 1) and a second end (towards the end of the body of the instrument Fig. 1), the rotating connector configured to allow operation of the strap assembly in a first position in which a first portion of the strap (at 14 in Figs. 2-3) located between the first end and the rotating connector is aligned with a second portion of the strap (at 26) located between the rotating connector and the second end (as shown in Fig. 2) and in a second position in which the first portion of the strap (at 14) is longitudinally rotated relative to the second portion of the strap (at 26, as shown in Fig. 4B and 4E, note that the other types of rotating connectors shown in Figs. 5-8 can also be used). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the connector of Feigenbaum’s invention with a rotating connector that allows operation of the strap assembly in a first position in which a first portion of the strap located between the first end and the rotating connector is aligned with a second portion of the strap located between the rotating connector and the second end and in a second position in which the first portion of the strap is longitudinally rotated relative to the second portion of the strap, as taught by Jeune in order to enable for a wider variety of exercises and easier maneuvering of the handle while performing various exercises while preventing the user from potential harm and discomfort during exercise. Note: According to ¶ [0023] and [0028]-[0029] of applicant’s specification, the particular problem with which the current application’s inventor is concerned is the user’s discomfort which may be caused by movement of various portions of the strap during exercise. According to ¶ [2]-[4] of Jeune, Jeune is also concerned with the same problem which is a twisted strap, for connecting to and enable holding a music instrument, causing discomfort for the user during performance and presents an invention (similar to applicant’s claims) to solve such problem. As such, Jeune is considered analogous art since Jeune is reasonably pertinent to the particular problem with which the inventor is concerned. Regarding claim 2, Feigenbaum in view of Jeune teaches wherein the first portion of the strap (Jeune: at 14) is connected to a first coupler (Jeune: 16 with 16A) of the rotating connector and the second portion of the strap (Jeune: at 26) is connected to a second coupler (Jeune: 20 with 20A) of the rotating connector (Jeune: Figs. 2-3). Regarding claim 3, Feigenbaum in view of Jeune teaches wherein the first portion of the strap (Jeune: at 14) is wrapped around a first bar (Jeune: 16A) of the first coupler (Jeune: Figs. 2-3) and the second portion of the strap (Jeune: at 26) is wrapped around a second bar (Jeune: 20A) of the second coupler (Jeune: Figs. 2-3). Regarding claim 4, Feigenbaum in view of Jeune teaches wherein the first portion of the strap (Jeune: at 14) forms a first loop that is connected back on itself to connect the first portion to the first coupler (Jeune: Figs. 2-4A). Regarding claim 5, Feigenbaum in view of Jeune teaches wherein the rotating connector comprises a first coupler (Jeune: 16 with 16A) and a second coupler (Jeune: 20 with 20A) configured to rotate relative to each other (Jeune: Figs. 2, 4A-4E), the first coupler and the second coupler connected to each other via a pin (Jeune: 22, Figs. 2-4E). Claims 11-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Feigenbaum in view of Jeune as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Jones (US 2022/0126162 A1). Feigenbaum in view of Jeune is silent about wherein the grip comprises: a core portion comprising a rigid cylinder defining a longitudinal inner cavity and a slot for accessing the inner cavity; and a cover portion rotatably coupled to the core portion, wherein the cover portion is operable in an open position in which an opening in the cover portion is aligned with the slot and in a closed position in which the opening in the cover portion is not aligned with the slot. Regarding claim 11, Jones teaches a grip (100), wherein the grip comprises: a core portion (200) comprising a rigid cylinder (202) defining a longitudinal inner cavity (Figs. 1 and 5) and a slot (201) for accessing the inner cavity (Figs. 1, 3 and 5, ¶ [22], [25]); and a cover portion (300) rotatably coupled to the core portion (Fig. 2), wherein the cover portion is operable in an open position in which an opening (304, Fig. 4) in the cover portion is aligned with the slot and in a closed position in which the opening in the cover portion is not aligned with the slot (¶ [24], [27]). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the connector of Feigenbaum’s invention in view of Jeune, wherein the grip comprises: a core portion comprising a rigid cylinder defining a longitudinal inner cavity and a slot for accessing the inner cavity; and a cover portion rotatably coupled to the core portion, wherein the cover portion is operable in an open position in which an opening in the cover portion is aligned with the slot and in a closed position in which the opening in the cover portion is not aligned with the slot as taught by Jones in order to enable easy exchange of the handle when need be. Regarding claim 12, Feigenbaum in view of Jeune and Jones teaches wherein the grip is removable from the elongated strap (Jones: strap 800, Fig. 8) when in the open position (Jones: ¶ [27], please note that upon modification of Feigenbaum’s invention in view of Jeune with features of Jones, the grip would be removable from the elongated strap of Feigenbaum). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6-9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: with respect to claims 6-9, the prior arts of record (see above), teach a strap assembly configured for use during exercise comprises: an inelastic elongated strap member that includes a grip positioned at a first end; and a rotating connector positioned along the strap member between the first end and a second end, the rotating connector configured to allow operation of the strap assembly in a first position in which a first portion of the strap located between the first end and the rotating connector is aligned with a second portion of the strap located between the rotating connector and the second end, and in a second position in the first portion of the strap is longitudinally rotated relative to the second portion of the strap (see above for details), but fail to disclose, teach or render obvious the strap assembly further comprising a connector cover wherein the connector cover is configured to operate in a restricting position and in a free position, the connector cover positioned over the rotating connector when in the restricting position to restrict rotation of the rotating connector (recited in claim 6). Please see attached PTO-892 for further pertinent prior art references. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHILA JALALZADEH ABYANEH whose telephone number is (571)270-7403. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 8:30 am - 3:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, LoAn Jimenez can be reached at (571)272- 4966. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHILA JALALZADEH ABYANEH/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3784
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 31, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12582872
PROCESSING SYSTEM, PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12558593
System and Method for Using an Exercise Machine to Improve Completion of an Exercise
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12533545
SYSTEM FOR MONITORING A GYMNASTIC DEVICE AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12515105
Balance Tilt Board
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12508459
MOTORIZED PILATES REFORMER SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
50%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+48.3%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 571 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month