Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/790,854

METHODS FOR MANAGING STORAGE OPERATIONS FOR MULTIPLE HOSTS COUPLED TO DUAL-PORT SOLID-STATE DISKS AND DEVICES THEREOF

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jul 31, 2024
Priority
Mar 14, 2023 — continuation of 12/086,059
Examiner
SADLER, NATHAN
Art Unit
2139
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Netapp Inc.
OA Round
3 (Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
475 granted / 672 resolved
+15.7% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+26.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
698
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
81.5%
+41.5% vs TC avg
§102
6.1%
-33.9% vs TC avg
§112
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 672 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event a determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102, 103, and 112 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102, 103, and 112) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for a rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon and/or the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Notice of Claim Interpretation Claims in this application are not interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) unless otherwise noted in an office action. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 9 March 2026 has been entered. Priority Applicant has filed a Correct Application Data Sheet adding continuity to U.S. Patent Applications 16/911,566 and 17/831,529. However, the continuity claim has not been entered. Based on this, the effective filing date of this application’s claimed invention is still 14 March 2023. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 10-29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Gole et al. (US 2021/0406174). It is noted that Gole has the same disclosure as the present application. Gole was published on 30 December 2021, which is more than one year before the effective filing date of this application’s claimed invention. Thus, the exceptions in 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1) do not apply. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 9 March 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The Examiner recognizes that the petition in the ‘389 Application was granted, and therefore the ‘389 Application has an effective filing date of 25 June 2020. However, the Corrected Application Data Sheet filed 6 March 2026 has not been entered. The Corrected Application Data Sheet filed 6 March 2026 identifies this application as a continuation of application 17/831,529. However, the ‘529 application issued as patent 11,640,356 on 2 May 2023. This application was filed 31 July 2024. Thus, these application were not copending as required by 37 CFR 1.78(d). Additionally, since this benefit claim was not submitted within four months of this application’s filing date, a petition and the petition fee are required. Finally, Applicant is advised that MPEP §211.02(a)(III) states “A cancellation of a benefit claim to a prior application may be considered as a showing that the applicant is intentionally waiving the benefit claim to the prior application in the instant application. If the applicant later files a petition to accept an unintentionally delayed claim to add the benefit claim to the prior application in the same application from which the benefit claim was canceled, the Office may refuse to accept such benefit claim because the delay was not unintentional.” Conclusion All claims are identical to or patentably indistinct from, or have unity of invention with claims in the application prior to the entry of the submission under 37 CFR 1.114 (that is, restriction (including a lack of unity of invention) would not be proper) and all claims could have been finally rejected on the grounds and art of record in the next Office action if they had been entered in the application prior to entry under 37 CFR 1.114. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL even though it is a first action after the filing of a request for continued examination and the submission under 37 CFR 1.114. See MPEP § 706.07(b). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NATHAN SADLER whose telephone number is (571)270-7699. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Reginald Bragdon can be reached at (571)272-4204. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Nathan Sadler/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2139 10 April 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 31, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 06, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Aug 27, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 11, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Mar 09, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 14, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12638997
METHOD, DEVICE, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR DATA MIGRATION
2y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12632376
MEMORY SYSTEMS AND OPERATION METHODS THEREOF AND STORAGE DEVICES AND OPERATION METHODS THEREOF
1y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12632188
INITIALIZING MEMORY SYSTEMS
1y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12625699
APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATICALLY REMOVING DATA OF MOBILE DEVICES
1y 9m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12619534
INTERCONNECT BASED ADDRESS MAPPING FOR IMPROVED RELIABILITY
1y 9m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+26.8%)
2y 11m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 672 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month