Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/791,033

BASIC BODY FOR AN ELECTRIC MOTOR

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Jul 31, 2024
Priority
Feb 22, 2019 — DE 102019104557.6 +2 more
Examiner
KENERLY, TERRANCE L
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Metabowerke GmbH
OA Round
2 (Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
851 granted / 1156 resolved
+5.6% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1175
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
60.8%
+20.8% vs TC avg
§102
26.3%
-13.7% vs TC avg
§112
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1156 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 7/6/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In response to applicant’s arguments regarding Jeram not disclosing the newly added limitations, this is not found persuasive (please see the rejection below that addresses why Jeram teaches the newly added limitations). In response to applicant’s argument regarding claim 13, this too is not found persuasive because adding a sensor at the end of a rotor is well known in the art and doing so would not render Jeram’s invention unsatisfactory and would render the invention an improved one as evidenced by the motivational statement. Still further, the sensor of Ichikawa et al. is placed on the “rotor” shaft which is still part of the rotor as a whole because it is rotating with the “rotor” core and “rotor” magnets (note: this is the exact configuration that applicant presents in fig 14). That being established, the person having ordinary skill in the art would have adapted the sensor configuration of Ichikawa et al. to Jeram’s configuration since Jeram discloses a space at the end of the “rotor: shaft that would accommodate the sensor. Thus, the limitations of claim 13 are satisfied. Claim Objections The numbering of claims is not in accordance with 37 CFR 1.126 which requires the original numbering of the claims to be preserved throughout the prosecution. When claims are canceled, the remaining claims must not be renumbered. When new claims are presented, they must be numbered consecutively beginning with the number next following the highest numbered claims previously presented (whether entered or not). Misnumbered claim 23 been renumbered 21. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 2-8, 11, 12, and 21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Jeram et al. (WO 2018162620). 2. Jeram et al. teach: A main body 13 for an electric motor (title) comprising: an outer wall 15 having a substantially cylindrical outer wall portion (see figs 3 & 4) forming a rotor space d configured to at least partially receiving a rotor R; a winding 10 at least partially attached to an outside portion 17 of the outer wall, wherein the winding at least partially forms a winding cylinder (Since the winding is wound around the rotor, figs 3-5); a laminated core 8 and 12 (figs 3-5) held by the outer wall; and a bearing L located within the winding cylinder (fig 4), wherein a shaft W of the rotor is receivable in the bearing (fig 4) , wherein the bearing is received in an inner wall that adjoins a dividing wall attached to an end of the substantially cylindrical outer wall portion, and wherein the inner wall extends axially beyond the substantially cylindrical outer wall portion into the winding cylinder. PNG media_image1.png 559 788 media_image1.png Greyscale 3. Jeram et al. teach: The main body of claim 2, wherein a portion of the winding extends past the substantially cylindrical outer wall portion and wherein the bearing is located within the winding cylinder that extends past the substantially cylindrical outer wall portion (see figs 3 & 4). 4. Jeram et al. teach: The main body of claim 2, wherein the laminated core includes a plurality of teeth 8 for receiving the winding (fig 5), wherein the plurality of teeth project to/toward the outside from the outer wall (figs 3-5). 5. Jeram et al. teach: The main body of claim 2, further comprising a dividing wall 16 attached to an end of the substantially cylindrical outer wall portion (fig 4), wherein the dividing wall has an opening configured to receive a shaft of the rotor (fig 4). 6. Jeram et al. teach: The main body of claim 5, wherein the bearing is received in the dividing wall (fig 4). 7. Jeram et al. teach: The main body of claim 5, wherein the opening in the dividing wall has a non-round cross section (it is a rectangular cross-section, fig 4). 8. Jeram et al. teach: The main body of claim 5, further comprising at least two webs 27 arranged on the dividing wall and configured to support a printed circuit board 25 or other components of the electric motor (fig 6). 11. Jeram et al. teach: The main body of claim 2, wherein the laminated core is overmolded with a material of the outer wall (since the outer wall is injection molded). 12. Jeram et al. teach: The main body of claim 2, wherein a receiving space 44 is formed by way of a peripheral depression (notch 44 is a depression, fig 4) between the outer wall and an inner wall 23, and wherein the receiving space receives one or more connector wires 39 for interconnection of the winding. 21. Jeram et al. teach: A main body 13 for an electric motor (title) comprising: an outer wall 15 having a substantially cylindrical outer wall portion forming a rotor space d configured to at least partially receiving a rotor R; a winding 10 at least partially attached to an outside portion of the outer wall; and a laminated core 8 and 12 (figs 3-5) held by the outer wall, wherein the laminated core is overmolded with a material of the outer wall (since the outer wall is injection molded) ; a dividing wall (annotated fig above) attached to an end of the substantially cylindrical outer wall portion (annotated fig above); a bearing (annotated fig above) located within a winding cylinder (annotated fig above) formed by the winding; and an inner wall (annotated fig above) that adjoins the dividing wall (annotated fig above), wherein the inner wall receives the bearing and extends axially beyond the substantially cylindrical outer wall portion (annotated fig above) into the winding cylinder (annotated fig above). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 9, 10, and 13-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jeram et al. in view of Ichikawa et al. (US 20160285331). 9. Jeram et al. teach: The main body of claim 5, further comprising an axial extension (of Jeram et al., annotated fig 4 below) configured to receive a position transmitter (of Ichikawa et al.) attached to the rotor, wherein the axial extension (of Jeram et al., annotated fig 4 below) is provided on a side of the dividing wall (of Jeram et al., annotated fig 4 below) facing away from the rotor space (of Jeram et al., annotated fig 4 below), and wherein the axial extension (of Jeram et al., annotated fig 4 below) and the dividing wall (of Jeram et al., annotated fig 4 below) at least partially isolate the position transmitter (of Ichikawa et al.) from the exterior of the main body (of Jeram et al., annotated fig 4 below). 10. Jeram et al. teach: The main body of claim 9, further comprising a rotor R received in the rotor space, wherein an end of the rotor extends into the axial extension (annotated fig 4 below); but does not teach that the position transmitter is attached to the end of the rotor. Ichikawa et al. teach that a position transmitter 28 attached to the end of the rotor 36a so as to provide better control of the rotor which improves the reliability of the motor. As a result, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art prior to the invention being effectively filed to modify the invention of Jeram et al. with a position transmitter attached to the end of the rotor, as taught by Ichikawa et al. so as to improve the reliability of the motor. 13. Jeram et al. teach: An electric motor (title) comprising: a rotor R having an end (fig 4); a winding 10; and a main body 13 comprising: a substantially cylindrical outer wall 15 forming a rotor space d, wherein the rotor is at least partially received in the rotor space (fig 4), and wherein the winding is at least partially attached to an outside of the substantially cylindrical outer wall (fig 5); a laminated core 8 & 12 held by the outer wall; a dividing wall 16, wherein the dividing wall at least partially seals the rotor space (fig 4); an axial extension (annotated fig 4 below) provided on a side of the dividing wall facing away from the rotor space, wherein the end of the rotor is received in the axial extension; and a closure wall (annotated fig 4 below); but does not teach i) a position transmitter attached to the end of the rotor; and ii) wherein the closure wall encapsulates the position transmitter. PNG media_image2.png 388 847 media_image2.png Greyscale Ichikawa et al. teach that i) a position transmitter 28 attached to the end of the rotor 36a; and ii) wherein the closure wall (of Jeram et al.) encapsulates the position transmitter (of Ichikawa et al.) so as to provide better control of the rotor which improves the reliability of the motor. As a result, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art prior to the invention being effectively filed to modify the invention of Jeram et al. with i) a position transmitter attached to the end of the rotor; and ii) wherein the closure wall encapsulates the position transmitter, as taught by Ichikawa et al. so as to improve the reliability of the motor. 14. Jeram et al. in view of Ichikawa et al. teach: The electric motor of claim 13, further comprising a sensor 16 (of Ichikawa et al.) configured to interact with the position transmitter to sense the position of the rotor. 15. Jeram et al. in view of Ichikawa et al. teach: The electric motor of claim 14, further comprising a space (of Jeram et al.) isolated from the exterior of the electric motor (of Jeram et al.), wherein the sensor (of Ichikawa et al.) is located in the space. 16. Jeram et al. teach: The electric motor of claim 13, wherein the winding at least partially forms a winding cylinder, and further comprising a bearing L located within the winding cylinder, wherein a shaft W of the rotor is received in the bearing and rotates by way of the bearing. 17. Jeram et al. teach: The electric motor of claim 16, wherein a portion of the winding (see figs 3-5) extends past a substantially cylindrical portion of the outer wall and wherein the bearing is located within the winding cylinder (see figs 3-5) that extends past the substantially cylindrical portion of the outer wall (see figs 3-5). 18. Jeram et al. teach: The electric motor of claim 13, wherein the laminated core is overmolded with a material of the outer wall (since the outer wall is injection molded). 19. Jeram et al. teach: The electric motor of claim 13, further comprising a receiving space 44 formed by way of a peripheral depression (notch 44 is a depression, fig 4) between the outer wall and an inner wall 23, and wherein the receiving space receives one or more connector wires 39 for interconnection of the winding. 20. Jeram et al. teach: The electric motor of claim 13, further comprising at least two webs 27 arranged on the dividing wall and configured to support a printed circuit board 25 or other components of the electric motor. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TERRANCE L KENERLY whose telephone number is (571)270-7851. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher Koehler can be reached at 5712723560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TERRANCE L KENERLY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 31, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 08, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jul 06, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 24, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12744445
MAGNETIC COUPLER FOR RETROFIT PROPULSION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744436
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING ROTOR AND ROTOR
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738804
DRIVE SYSTEM
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732043
ROTOR FOR AN EXTERNAL ROTOR MOTOR
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12726067
SWITCHED RELUCTANCE ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+15.2%)
2y 7m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1156 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month