Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/791,354

DELAY-LOCKED LOOP CIRCUIT AND DELAY-LOCKED LOOP METHOD

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 31, 2024
Examiner
BHATIA, AMIT R
Art Unit
2842
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Yellow River Electronic Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
16 granted / 21 resolved
+8.2% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
36
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
43.5%
+3.5% vs TC avg
§102
29.2%
-10.8% vs TC avg
§112
25.0%
-15.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 21 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Election/Restrictions Claims 11-13 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on December 7, 2025. Drawings The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(4) because reference character “1400” has been used to designate both a voltage generation circuit (Fig. 1, 15) and a delay distribution method (Fig. 14). The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a) because they fail to show the second clock signal CLKA is to be generated by analog delay duration TANA, but it appears that Fig. 2A shows a combination of CLKA and CLKB as described in the specification paragraph 0047. Any structural detail that is essential for a proper understanding of the disclosed invention should be shown in the drawing. MPEP § 608.02(d). The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(5) because they do not include the following reference sign(s) mentioned in the description: TFIX (paragraph 0034); T1, T2, TANA, TDIG (paragraph 0035). These examples are not the entire list. Applicant is required to review the specification to correct any additional errors. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: regarding the adjusted second clock signal (CLKB), in paragraph 0035 CLKB is called out as adjusted clock signal. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 (lines 4-8) recites "delay the m-th delay signal by a first reference duration, an analog delay duration, and a second reference duration to correspondingly generate a first clock signal, a second clock signal, and a third clock signal, adjust the digital delay duration according to the first clock signal, the second clock signal, and the third clock signal". It appears the first clock signal (CLKA') is generated from the first delay reference duration/circuit (1220), the third clock signal (CLKA'') is generated from the second delay reference duration/circuit (1230), but it is unclear how the second clock signal (CLKA) is generated from the analog delay duration/circuit (1240), as Fig. 2A shows CLKA as an input to the reset circuit (1252). Claim 1 (lines 20-21) recites "to readjust the adjusted analog delay duration until a twice-adjusted second clock signal output from the delay distribution circuit". It is unclear where the twice-adjusted second clock signal is shown in the drawings and how this output is formed. Claims 2-15 inherit the defects of the independent claim 1. Claim 16 (lines 7-11) recites "delaying the m-th delay signal by a first reference duration, an analog delay duration, and a second reference duration to correspondingly generate a first clock signal, a second clock signal, and a third clock signal, and adjusting the digital delay duration according to the first clock signal, the second clock signal, and the third clock signal". It appears the first clock signal (CLKA') is generated from the first delay reference duration/circuit (1220), the third clock signal (CLKA'') is generated from the second delay reference duration/circuit (1230), but it is unclear how the second clock signal (CLKA) is generated from the analog delay duration/circuit (1240), as Fig. 2A shows CLKA as an input to the reset circuit (1252). Claim 16 (lines 23-25) recites "to readjust the adjusted analog delay duration until a twice-adjusted second clock signal output from the delay distribution circuit". It is unclear where the twice-adjusted second clock signal is shown in the drawings and how this output is formed. Claims 17-21 inherit the defects of the independent claim 16. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1 and 16 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claims 2-10, 14-15, and 17-21 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Fiscus (US 6628154 B2) and Vlasenko et al. (US 20040125905 A1); the prior art discloses a standard delay-locked loop including a delay line, a phase detector, a voltage generation circuit. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Amit Bhatia whose telephone number is (571)272-4410. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30am-4:30pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lincoln Donovan can be reached at (571) 272-1988. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Amit R Bhatia/Examiner, Art Unit 2842 /LINCOLN D DONOVAN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2842
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 31, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Apr 07, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597924
DETERIORATION INHIBITING CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591281
RESET OUTPUT WITH OPEN DRAIN CONFIGURATION FOR FUNCTIONAL SAFETY (FUSA) APPLICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592696
CASCODE SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587101
POWER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WITH DISTRIBUTED ERROR FEEDBACK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12567858
High-Speed Delay Line for Die-To-Die Interconnect
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.4%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 21 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month