Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/791,902

HOLDER AND METHOD FOR HOLDING AN OBJECT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 01, 2024
Priority
May 19, 2022 — provisional 63/343,711 +1 more
Examiner
GARFT, CHRISTOPHER
Art Unit
3632
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Fluke Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
840 granted / 1423 resolved
+7.0% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
72 currently pending
Career history
1508
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
48.0%
+8.0% vs TC avg
§102
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
§112
26.8%
-13.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1423 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 6/10/2026 has been entered. Claims 1-20 remain pending with claims 13-20 withdrawn as being non-elected. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1, 4-9, and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim US 2002/0179783 (hereinafter Kim) in view of Kunkel US 2482625 (hereinafter Kunkel). Re. Cl. 1, Kim discloses: An apparatus (Fig. 1) for holding a plurality of objects (see Fig. 1, via 37-38), comprising: a central holding device (15, Fig. 1); and a plurality of holders (37-38, Fig. 1) separate from the central holding device (see Fig. 1-2, removably attached to 15c) and wherein the plurality of holders are simultaneously couplable to the central holding device (see Fig. 1) and wherein each holder of the plurality of holders includes: a movable clip with an aperture through which an object can be inserted and held within the aperture (see Fig. 1, within 37 and 38). Re. Cl. 4, Kim discloses: the central holding device includes: a periphery to which the plurality of holders is couplable (see Fig. 2, where 15c are located), wherein the periphery includes a plurality of horizontally-oriented coupling apertures (15c, Fig. 2) configured to couple respective holders of the plurality of holders to the central holding device (see Fig. 1-2). Re. Cl. 5, Kim discloses: the central holding device further includes one or more vertically-oriented apertures (see 15a, Fig. 2), wherein at least one vertically-oriented aperture of the one or more vertically-oriented apertures is configured to hold an object (27, Fig. 1) that supports the central holding device at a fixed position relative to an external instrument (see Fig. 1). Re. Cl. 6, Kim discloses: the movable clip of a holder includes a fastener that is operable to couple the holder to a respective horizontally-oriented coupling aperture on the periphery of the central holding device (see Fig. 1, 38b and 37b for fasteners which fit within 15c to attach the parts together as shown; the term “fastener” is understood to mean a device, substance etc. that serves to fasten; as can be seen in Fig. 1 the end of 37b, 38b which fits within 15c meets that definition). Re. Cl. 7, Kim discloses: the central holding device is a first central holding device (see 15, Fig. 1), the apparatus further comprising a second central holding device (other 15, Fig. 1) that is directly attachable to the first central holding device (see Fig. 1, the two 15s are directly attachable together by sliding them vertically so they rest on one another), wherein each of the first and second central holding devices is configured to couple multiple holders of the plurality of holders (see Fig. 1). Re. Cl. 8, Kim discloses: the second central holding device includes a periphery to which holders of the plurality of holders are couplable (see Fig. 2, periphery where 15c’s are located); and wherein the second central holding device is attachable to the first central holding device (see Fig. 1, via 27) with a rotational offset relative to the first central holding device (see Fig. 1-2, using 20, the positioning of 15 can be adjusted so that there is a rotational offset between them). Re. Cl. 9, Kim discloses: the second central holding device includes one or more vertically-oriented apertures (see Fig. 2, aperture 15a where 27 fits) that align with one or more vertically-oriented apertures of the first central holding device (see Fig. 1) when the second central holding device is attached to the first central holding device (see Fig. 1, 15s are attached indirectly via 27). Re. Cl. 11, Kim discloses: at least one vertically-oriented aperture of the first and second central holding devices is configured to hold an object (15a, Fig. 2) in a center of the first and second central holding devices (see Fig. 1). Re. Cl. 1, Kim does not disclose the holder includes a tube having a first end and a second end that is opposite to the first end; a movable clip at the first end of the tube, the movable clip is movable between a retracted position and an extended position, and in the extended position the movable clip is moved axially outward from an end surface at the first end of the tube; and a spring that exerts a spring force on the movable clip, such that, in response to movement of the movable clip toward the extended position, the spring exerts a spring force that pulls the movable clip toward the retracted position. Kunkel disclose a holder (Fig. 1) including a tube (10, Fig. 1) having a first end (10b, Fig. 1) and a second end (10a, Fig. 1 that is opposite to the first end (see Fig. 1); a movable clip (15, Fig. 1) at the first end of the tube (see Fig. 1), the movable clip having an aperture (15a, Fig. 2) through which an object can be inserted and held within the aperture (see Fig. 3, object 17), the movable clip is movable between a retracted position and an extended position (see Fig. 1 and 3), and in the extended position the movable clip is moved axially outward from an end surface (13, Fig. 1-3) at the first end of the tube (see Fig. 1-2, when 15 is extended to the right, the clip 15 is moved axially outward from end surface 13); and a spring (18, Fig. 3) that exerts a spring force on the movable clip (see Fig. 1-3), such that, in response to movement of the movable clip toward the extended position (Fig. 2), the spring exerts a spring force that pulls the movable clip toward the retracted position (see Fig. 1-2, as shown, when 15 is pushed to the right as shown in the progression from Fig. 1 to Fig. 2, the spring 18 would provide an opposite “pull” force on 15 so that it is moved back towards the retracted configuration). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to replace the holder of Kim with the holder of Kunkel with reasonable expectation of success since Kunkel states that such a modification is simple, economical and easy to apply which also more resistant to splitting or breaking during use and may not be easily inadvertently dismantled (Col. 1, Line 4-13). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-3, 10 and 12 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-12 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Barnes US 2429305, Finger US 3632147, Heibel US 4661891, Ibbitson US 6585207, Lo US 5549408, and Tsai US 7097146 disclose other known holding devices presented to the Applicant for their consideration. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER E GARFT whose telephone number is (571)270-1171. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Terrell McKinnon can be reached at (571)272-4797. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER GARFT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3632
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 4 earlier events
Mar 31, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 31, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 06, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 28, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 10, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 18, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12764442
REMOTE RADIO HEAD MOUNTING BRACKET AND METHOD FOR USE
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12752126
lamp body bracket device
1y 0m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12742332
METHOD FOR CONSTRUCTING ACCESS FLOOR BY USING UNMANNED ROBOT
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12742514
DUAL PURPOSE INFORMATION HANDLING SYSTEM AND PERPHERAL DISPLAY STAND
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12723703
SUPPORT BASE
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+23.2%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1423 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month