Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/792,431

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SATELLITE SWITCHING IN NON-TERRETRIAL NETWORK

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 01, 2024
Priority
Aug 02, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0100974 +1 more
Examiner
HWANG, JOON H
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
9%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
Est. Remaining
17%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 9% of cases
9%
Career Allowance Rate
4 granted / 43 resolved
-50.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 9m
Avg Prosecution
5 currently pending
Career history
50
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
§103
53.5%
+13.5% vs TC avg
§102
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
§112
11.4%
-28.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 43 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-20 are pending. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 5, 7-8, 10-13, 15-18, and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Uemura et al. (US 2025/0357999). With respect to claim 1, Uemura teaches obtaining, from a first satellite, uplink (UL) timing advance (TA)-related information for a second satellite (e.g., receiving control information including time information related to switching time from the first satellite to a second satellite, abstract, sections [0074] and [0096]). Uemura teaches performing satellite switching from the first satellite to the second satellite (e.g., switching satellites, abstract, section [0074], fig. 4). Uemura teaches performing communication with the second satellite based on the UL TA-related information (e.g., resynchronization of downlink and uplink timing of the second satellite based on the control information, sections [0009], [0074] and [0096]). With respect to claim 2, Uemura teaches the UL TA-related information includes at least one of information related to a network-controlled common TA for calculating a UL TA for the second satellite or information related to a TA estimated by the terminal (e.g., adjusting uplink synchronization using common TA, section [0069]). With respect to claim 3, Uemura teaches the information related to the network-controlled common TA includes at least one of a common TA, a primary change amount parameter for the common TA, or a second change amount parameter for the common TA (e.g., adjusting uplink synchronization using common TA, section [0069]). With respect to claim 5, Uemura teaches in the performing of the communication with the second satellite, the terminal determines a UL TA for the second satellite based on the UL TA-related information after switching to the second satellite, and applies the determine UL TA to the communication with the second satellite (e.g., the terminal adjusts uplink synchronization using a common TA and a dedicated timing advance (TA), sections [0069], [0066], [0070], and [0043]-[0044]). With respect to claim 7, Uemura teaches wherein the first satellite and the second satellite are connected to a same base station (e.g., satellite connected to the same gateway, fig. 1 and fig. 5). Uemura teaches the first satellite forms a first quasi-Earth-fixed cell and the second satellite forms a second quasi-Earth-fixed cell (e.g., a quasi-earth fixed cell, sections [0064]-[0065] and figs. 4-5). Uemura teaches a physical cell identifier (PCI) ​​of the first quasi-Earth-fixed cell is equal to a PCI of the second quasi-Earth-fixed cell (e.g., the control information indicating that the first cell and the second cell have the same physical cell IDs, section [0010]). Uemura teaches a frequency resource through which a first synchronization signal block (SSB) received by the terminal is transmitted from the first satellite based on the first quasi-Earth-fixed cell is equal to a frequency resource through which a second SSB received by the terminal is transmitted from the second satellite based on the second quasi-Earth-fixed cell (e.g., cells providing the same frequency band, sections [0059]-[0060], [0070]-[0071], and [0078]). With respect to claim 8, Uemura teaches stopping communication services of the first satellite based on the satellite switching (i.e., cancels or suspends various transmission procedures, sections [0086]-[0087] and [0090]). Uemura teaches connecting to the second satellite based on the satellite switching (sections [0086]-[0087]). Uemura teaches performing the communication with the second satellite through a service link based on the UL TA-related information (e.g. resumes the transmission procedures after the cell switching, sections [0086]-[0087] and [0090]). With respect to claim 10, Uemura teaches providing communication services to a terminal connected via a serving satellite (e.g., a communication from the base station 20 to the terminal 10 via a satellite, fig. 1 and sections [0034]-[0035]). Uemura teaches generating uplink (UL) timing advance (TA)-related information for a target satellite and providing the UL TA-related information to the terminal via the serving satellite (e.g., uplink adjustment value (common TA)) corresponding to the satellite communication to the terminal using SIB 19, sections [0066] and [0069] and fig. 3). With respect to claim 11, Uemura teaches the base station transmits the UL TA-related information to the terminal by including the UL TA-related information in a system information block (SIB) 19 (e.g., the base station transmits a set of information (e.g., uplink adjustment value (common TA)) corresponding to the satellite communication to the terminal using SIB 19, section [0066]). With respect to claim 12, Uemura teaches the UL TA-related information includes at least one of information related to a network-controlled common TA for calculating a UL TA for the target satellite or information related to a TA estimated by the terminal (e.g., adjusting uplink synchronization using common TA, section [0069]). With respect to claim 13, Uemura teaches the information related to the network-controlled common TA includes at least one of a common TA, a primary change amount parameter for the common TA, or a secondary change amount parameter for the common TA (e.g., adjusting uplink synchronization using common TA, section [0069]). With respect to claim 15, Uemura teaches performing satellite switching of a satellite providing communication services to the terminal from the serving satellite to the target satellite (e.g., switching satellites, abstract, section [0074], fig. 4). Uemura teaches providing communication services to the terminal via the target satellite based on the UL TA-related information for the target satellite (e.g., resynchronization of downlink and uplink timing of the second satellite based on the control information, sections [0009], [0074]). The limitations of claim 16 are rejected in the analysis of claim 1 above, and the claim is rejected on that basis. The limitations of claim 17 are rejected in the analysis of claim 2 above, and the claim is rejected on that basis. The limitations of claim 18 are rejected in the analysis of claim 3 above, and the claim is rejected on that basis. The limitations of claim 20 are rejected in the analysis of claim 5 above, and the claim is rejected on that basis. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4, 9, 14, and 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Uemura et al. (US 2025/0357999) in view of Lyu et al. (US 2026/0089595). With respect to claim 4, Uemura teaches the information related to the TA estimated by the terminal includes information on an epoch time and ephemeris-related information (e.g., ephemeris information, sections [0066] and [0069]). Uemura does not explicitly disclose information on an epoch time. However, Lyu teaches information on an epoch time (e.g., auxiliary information includes ephemeris of the satellite and epoch time, sections [0122]-[0124]) in order to perform cell handover. Therefore, based on Uemura in view of Lyu, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize the teaching of Lyu to the system of Uemura in order to perform cell handover. With respect to claim 9, Uemura teaches connecting to the second satellite based on the satellite switching (sections [0086]-[0087]). Uemura teaches stopping communication services of the first satellite (i.e., cancels or suspends various transmission procedures, sections [0086]-[0087] and [0090]). Uemura teaches performing the communication with the second satellite through a service link based on the UL TA-related information (e.g., resumes the transmission procedures after the cell switching, sections [0086]-[0087] and [0090]). Uemura does not explicitly disclose stopping communication services of the first satellite after connecting to the second satellite. However, Lyu teaches stopping communication services of the first satellite after connecting to the second satellite (e.g., the terminal starts to perform downlink synchronization before a time at which the source satellite stops providing a service, sections [0202]-[0205]) in order to ensure service continuity. Therefore, based on Uemura in view of Lyu, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize the teaching of Lyu to the system of Uemura in order to ensure service continuity. With respect to claim 14, Uemura teaches the information related to the TA estimated by the terminal includes information on an epoch time and ephemeris-related information (e.g., ephemeris information, sections [0066] and [0069]). Uemura does not explicitly disclose information on an epoch time. However, Lyu teaches information on an epoch time (e.g., auxiliary information includes ephemeris of the satellite and epoch time, sections [0122]-[0124]) in order to perform cell handover. Therefore, based on Uemura in view of Lyu, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize the teaching of Lyu to the system of Uemura in order to perform cell handover. The limitations of claim 19 are rejected in the analysis of claim 4 above, and the claim is rejected on that basis. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 6 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOON H HWANG whose telephone number is (571)272-4036. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9:00 am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOON H HWANG/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2447 7/11/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 01, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12652242
HARDWARE OFFLOAD FOR TRANSMIT PROCESSING OF PACKETS
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12647383
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DEVICE SELECTION AND MODIFIED OUTPUT UPON RECEIVING NOTIFICATIONS
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12536028
SELF-EVALUATING HASHCHAIN-BASED DISTRIBUTED BOT HUBS
2y 8m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12519871
COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 8m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12470490
SELECTING A COMMUNICATION METHOD USING A MANAGEMENT CONTROLLER OF A DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM
1y 6m to grant Granted Nov 11, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
9%
Grant Probability
17%
With Interview (+7.4%)
4y 9m (~2y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 43 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month