Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/792,712

BASE STATIONS AND USER EQUIPMENTS CONFIGURED TO HANDLE ON-DEMAND SYSTEM INFORMATION IN 5G NR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 02, 2024
Priority
Oct 05, 2017 — EU 17195076.9 +4 more
Examiner
TORRES, MARCOS L
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Sony Group Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
471 granted / 701 resolved
+7.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
751
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
87.6%
+47.6% vs TC avg
§102
6.2%
-33.8% vs TC avg
§112
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 701 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 1-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Basu Mallick 20230147127 in view of Kim 20190069220. As to claim 1, Basu Mallick discloses an electronic device [110] comprising: circuitry [425] configured to receive an indicator of random-access resources [RACH parameters] in essential system information broadcasted [220] from a network [105] (see par. 0034, 0046); transmit an on-demand system information request to the network [225], wherein the on-demand system information request is transmitted in first random access resource of the indicated random access resources, and the first random access resource includes a random-access preamble [The mobile device 110 may transmit a Physical Random Access Channel (PRACH) preamble in a specific PRACH resource specific to a System Information Block (SIB) or set of SIBs (called SI message) which the mobile device 110 wants to obtain.] (see par. 0035, 0043, 0046); and receive a Random-Access Response (RAR) [230] comprising a Random-Access Preamble Identifier (RAPID) corresponding to the transmitted random-access preamble (see par. 0046, claims 3 and 4), wherein the indicated random access resources in the essential system information are respectively mapped to system information blocks (SIBs) which are not included in the essential system information [The minimum SI indicates whether a specific SIB is periodically broadcasted or provided on-demand.] (see fig. 3A and 3B; par. 0034). The priority document does not explicitly disclose a Random-Access Preamble Identifier. In an analogous art, Kim discloses receive a Random-Access Response (RAR) comprising a Random-Access Preamble Identifier (RAPID) corresponding to the transmitted random-access preamble (see par. 0081). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the present invention to include random access response information for one or more UEs with a random-access preamble ID to indicate a UE for which a UL grant, a temporary C-RNTI, and a TAC are valid; thereby, avoiding communication errors (see par. 0081). As to claim 2, Basu Mallick discloses the electronic device of claim 1, wherein the electronic device is a user equipment (UE) configured to communicate with a wireless network (see fig. 1A; par. 0033). As to claim 3, Basu Mallick discloses the electronic device of claim 1, wherein the network is a wireless network comprising a gNodeB (see fig. 1A; par. 0033). As to claim 4, Basu Mallick discloses the electronic device of claim 1, wherein the network is a New Radio Access Technology (NR) wireless communication network (first line provisional application 62/519,648). As to claim 5, Basu Mallick discloses the electronic device of claim 3, wherein the SIBs that are not included in the essential system information are included in on-demand system information [The mobile device 110 may transmit a Physical Random Access Channel (PRACH) preamble in a specific PRACH resource specific to a System Information Block (SIB) or set of SIBs (called SI message) which the mobile device 110 wants to obtain.] (see par. 0035, 0043, 0046). As to claims 6-8, Basu Mallick discloses the electronic device of claim 5, wherein the random-access response comprising the Random Access Preamble Identifier (RAPID) indicates that a first SIB corresponding to the first random access resource will be broadcasted; wherein the first SIB is included in the SIBs which are not included in the essential system information; wherein the indicated random access resources in the essential system information are respectively reserved for the SIBs which are not included in the essential system information. [The minimum SI indicates whether a specific SIB is periodically broadcasted or provided on-demand.] (see fig. 3A and 3B; par. 0034-0035, 0043, 0046). The priority document does not explicitly disclose a Random-Access Preamble Identifier. In an analogous art, Kim discloses receive a Random-Access Response (RAR) comprising a Random-Access Preamble Identifier (RAPID) corresponding to the transmitted random-access preamble (see par. 0081). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the present invention to include random access response information for one or more UEs with a random-access preamble ID to indicate a UE for which a UL grant, a temporary C-RNTI, and a TAC are valid; thereby, avoiding communication errors (see par. 0081). Regarding claims 9-16, they are the corresponding gNodeB claims of UE claims 1-8. Thereby, claims 9-16 are rejected for the same reasons as shown above. Regarding claims 17-18, they are the corresponding method claims of device claims 1 and 9. Thereby, claims 17-18 are rejected for the same reasons as shown above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARCOS L TORRES whose telephone number is (571)272-7926. The examiner can normally be reached 10:00 AM - 6:00 PM M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alison Slater can be reached at (571)270-0375. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MARCOS L. TORRES Primary Examiner Art Unit 2647 /MARCOS L TORRES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2647
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 02, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684326
Adaptive User-Controllable Wireless Emergency Alert Presentation
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12666238
VIDEO IN SUPPORT OF EMERGENCY SERVICES CALL LOCATION DATA
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12659002
USER EQUIPMENT INDICATION OF ASSISTANCE INFORMATION IN BLOCKAGE PREDICTION REPORT
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12659864
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BAND-BASED POWER SAVING IN A WIRELESS NETWORK
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12652703
SELECTING RANDOM ACCESS CHANNEL OCCASIONS FOR SUBBAND FULL-DUPLEX
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+11.4%)
3y 4m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 701 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month